Slashdot Mirror
Single-Atom Layer of Tin May Be a New Wonder Conductor
At Kurzweil AI, an article proclaims that the next wonder material for computer chips may be an unexpectedly common one:
"Move over, graphene. 'Stanene' — a single layer of tin atoms — could be the world’s first material to conduct electricity with 100 percent efficiency at the temperatures that computer chips operate, according to a team of theoretical physicists led by researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University." (Original paper is available here, but paywalled.)
Seems unlikely. Something about complimentary midday meals...
It is right and proper to have doubts about new announcements like this. That is the basis of science - the idea of "replicate, then trust, but verify" at the core of scientific approaches. If this turns out to be either an error, a late April-fools joke, a scam, a one-off result that cannot be replicated, or a valid result within a small range of constraints, then it will be labelled as such.
However, if subsequent independent experiments show a robust and consistent process that can be replicated easily, then I for one will welcome our new (1 atom-thick) tinfoil hat-wearing overlords...
There is no such thing as conducting electricity at 100 percent efficiency. Think about it... it implies perpetual machines, and I believe there's some evidence against the possibility of such a thing :D
You are wrong.
The evidence against perpetual machines are only for machines with a higher than 100 percent efficiency, not machines that approaches 100 percent efficiency. You can have a wheel in space that spins perpetually, you cannot extract energy from it without slowing it down.
Also, as far as I know the 'proof' is based on a statistical observation of how energy works with a macroscopic number of particles.
While it is highly unlikely that anyone can build an energy creator by working on a subatomic level I don't think that there is any hard evidence that proves this impossible. To get that proof one would probably have to explain why matter and energy exists at all and why it can't happen again.
At least as far as I can tell without access to the paywalled concept.
Important questions would be:
What is the maximum current that can be transported through strips of various widths?
How sensitive to defects is the process?
Tin is going to be a major problem for much semiconductor processing - as it means you basically now can't solder the chip, or do any even 'low' temperature processing after it's deposited - it has to be the last layer.
AC, Superconductor. Superconductor, this is AC.
Arxiv to the rescue: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.3008 (This may lack editorial changes etc. made by the journal, but should be factually complete.)
Stefan Axelsson
NOW they tell me my tinfoil hat in fact amplifies my brainwaves to be read. THANKS A LOT LONE GUNMEN!
Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
For those of you not in the semiconductor business, the fact that these conductive strips is pretty important too. Most of the capacitance (that has to be charged and discharged whenever a node switches, causing losses in the transistors driving the node) is sidewall capacitance: capacitance between adjacent lines on the same level. Single-layer conductors won't completely do away with lateral capacitance (fringing, for instance) and the vertical capacitance will still be there -- but there's going to be a big reduction in power if they can get this to work. My guess is that by the time it reaches production it won't exactly be one layer, either -- it'll be a laminate with multiple redundant layers.
Always assuming the predictions play out.
Lacking <sarcasm> tags,
http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.3008 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.3008v2
Bzzzt! wrong. If I trust you, I will verify your work. If I don't trust you, I won't even bother to look at it.
Trust is about honesty, not about infallibility.
the losses are capacitive, you can reduce the losses by making smaller transistors but you really cant affect it by material selection
Yeah, the reason why material selection doesn't matter in capacitors is precisely why many of them are being manufactured using the fairly rare element named tantalum. It's just for the fun of it. ;-) Perhaps you're right about the interconnect material selection but there's a lot of material selection going on in modern ICs beyond that.
Ezekiel 23:20
These guys are talking about a 2D topological insulator. This is the current hot area of research in condensed matter physics, and is absolutely not a superconductor.
A topological insulator is best described as an insulator, which for very particular types of conduction (direction, location and energy limited) acts like a very good metal. It's really interesting, and scientists are trying to show it will have practical use, and these materials might end up in a computer chip in a few years, but...
There is a big difference between a lab effect and the real world. Carbon nanotubes have most of the same "non scattering" effects you'd hope to find in a topological insulator. Yet, in most actual devices, they do not conduct in bulk the way theory would suggest. For nanoscale systems (these are nanoscale systems) the environment around the material is nearly as important as the material itself, and scattering from the environment (oxides, metals, air) drastically reduces the performance of the material. There are ways around that, but the additional costs and engineering difficulty are generally enough to prevent any practical commercialization.