Slashdot Mirror


Getting Evolution In Science Textbooks For Texas Schools

First time accepted submitter windwalker13th writes "Recently the New York Times ran an article highlighting the pull that a State Board in Texas holds over that state and rest of the Nation. Because of the unique way in which Texas picks school textbooks (purchasing large volumes of textbooks at once to be used for the next decade) publishers pander to this board to get their books approved. The board currently holds several members (6 of 28 who are known to reject evolution) who hold creationist views and actively work to ensure that the science textbooks do not use as strong language or must include "critical thinking" about possible alternate explanations for evolution."

4 of 710 comments (clear)

  1. Creationism = religion, not science. At all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Creationism" does not have ANY place in a scientific textbook. These people MUST be told to go soak their heads for 40 days and 40 nights under peer review.

    Education in sciences isn't up for a debate along the lines of "everything we're teaching has an equally plausible antithesis, if you're raised religious."

    This is bullshit taught to children with tax dollars in a secular environment. Kill it with fire.

  2. Re:News for Nerds... by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article should mention that the concerned reviewer is an idiot. I'm so tired of the media pretending that "superstitious yahoo" is a point of view, and the truth lies half-way between our best understanding of the world and right-wing religious derp.

  3. Re:Double standards... by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why did you reply "So True" to something deeply stupid said by an anonymous creationist nutjob?

    "Evolutionist" makes about as much sense as "round-earthist." It's just derp from religious nuts who can't deal with reality. There is no scientific conspiracy to pretend that gods don't exist. It's just that zero gods have presented themselves, so we're pretty sure that they're imaginary just like the rest of the supernatural.

  4. Re:News for Nerds... by dskoll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On the other, you have the undeniable fact that most science is ... essentially no different than assuming the existence of gods

    When I get on a comfortable modern airplane to visit my family across the continent, I'm happy in the knowledge that science and technology will get me there in one piece. Now you strap a couple of two-by-fours to a firecracker and leap off a cliff happy in the knowledge that your god will save your life. Go on, try it.

    Science makes falsifiable, testable predictions. After a scientific theory has survived thousands of such falsifiable predictions, I'm willing to trust it with my life by getting into an airplane.

    Religion can spout whatever unprovable nonsense it wants with no justification whatsoever. See the difference? That is "essentially different" from the scientific method, contrary to your claim.