Slashdot Mirror


Intelligence Officials Fear Snowden's 'Doomsday' Cache

Dega704 writes with news that Edward Snowden is believed to have a collection of highly sensitive classified documents that will be released in the event he is detained, hurt, or killed. According to Reuters, "The data is protected with sophisticated encryption, and multiple passwords are needed to open it, said two of the sources, who like the others spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters. The passwords are in the possession of at least three different people and are valid for only a brief time window each day, they said. The identities of persons who might have the passwords are unknown." These details have caused several security experts to express skepticism, but multiple sources, including Glenn Greenwald, believe Snowden has not released all of the documents he appropriated. "U.S. officials and other sources said only a small proportion of the classified material Snowden downloaded during stints as a contract systems administrator for NSA has been made public. Some Obama Administration officials have said privately that Snowden downloaded enough material to fuel two more years of news stories." Whether or not it's true, U.S. and U.K. officials clearly believe it, which can only serve to protect Snowden.

9 of 381 comments (clear)

  1. The real news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is years' worth of material that makes intelligence analysts nervous. Just how much dirt could the US possibly have that they don't want people to know?

  2. Security is a tricky thing by mariox19 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bruce Schneier commented on this a while back:

    I'm not sure he's thought this through, though. I would be more worried that someone would kill me in order to get the documents released than I would be that someone would kill me to prevent the documents from being released. Any real-world situation involves multiple adversaries, and it's important to keep all of them in mind when designing a security system.

    I'm not sure what Snowden's alternative is, but a doomsday switch isn't exactly foolproof.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  3. It appears the USA has been up to some nasty stuff by Nyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if they are fearing what he hasn't released yet.

    They know what they did was wrong, and apparently have done even worse stuff.

    Time for a change in Government.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  4. Re:This is why I don't trust this guy by jbolden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Snowden's slow release has been keeping this story in the news. He's helping to build controversy around the programs. Releasing everything at once would just overwhelm the media and the pubic's ability to address all the issues raised.

  5. Re:Let's see by jonwil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a geek, a software developer and a security guy with a library of Schneier books on his bookshelf, I personally think that a list of "Technologies now considered "safe" for foreign spies, terrorists, and criminals to use - but have actually been hacked" is EXACTLY the sort of thing someone like Snowden should be leaking.

    Deliberately making widely-used things less secure in order to catch bad guys (including withholding exploit information that could be used to make things more secure) is NOT something the good guys should be engaging in. (and yes I still consider the US, UK and Australia as "good guys")

  6. too bad. by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should fear the Constitution and not do this shit in the first place.

    Didn't they say you only need privacy if you've got something to hide?

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  7. Re:Let's see by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the NSA can break AES, then anyone else might figure it out too.

    One of the NSA's mandates is to secure American communications. They have certified AES as being sufficient for Federal agencies to use to secure classified information, and even Top Secret classified information with large enough (192 or 256 bit) keys. This suggests one of two things:

    1. They're smart enough to break AES, but stupid enough to think nobody else can.
    2. The best cryptographers in the United States of America believe AES to be secure.

    Common sense says it's #2. Could the best American cryptographers have it completely wrong, and we'll find out when the next Pearl Harbor happens? Certainly. Is it a conspiracy where they know it's weak and are keeping it so in order to read your e-mail? Not bloody likely.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  8. Re:This is why I don't trust this guy by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In other words, Snowden is neither stupid nor suicidal.

  9. Re:That room on the 6th floor of the Book Deposito by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It was a damn good shot, I'll admit that. But I've seen plenty of people make tougher shots at faster moving targets from more restrictive positions while hunting wild game.
    He wouldn't have needed a spotter because he would have had plenty of audible cues for the approaching limo. Watching people in the crowd react would have served as all the warning he needed, as they pointed, stood up, jumped waved, shouted, cheered, and generally became exited as JFK came into their view.

    As for the angle, it's entirely possible that he shot the rifle left-handed which would have made it a lot easier to get that angle without leaning so far out. I myself am a right-handed person but I'm what is often called "left-eyed".. it's easier for me to shoot a rifle left-handed than right.

    As for knowing which head to shoot at, that's also pretty easy. It's the one right next to his wife. If I were in his shoes, I would've just looked for the woman with the fashion sense who stuck out like a sore thumb in a group of men in suits. She was always well-dressed and easy to spot in a crowd.

    I'm not saying I necessarily think Oswald did it alone, but all the things you've brought up I can quickly find reasonable explanations as to why they don't prove anything. And they were all already addressed many times in both official and unofficial examinations of the shooting. Keep in mind that Oswald was highly experienced and military trained, he wasn't just some random guy who picked up a rifle for the first time that day.