Slashdot Mirror


How Much of ISON Survived Its Closest Approach To the Sun?

SternisheFan writes "This Ars Technica article examines what may be left of ISON and contains a detailed animated GIF from the NASA STEREO Ahead spacecraft. 'It looks like comet ISON, or most of it, did not survive its encounter with the Sun yesterday, when it made a close approach at just 1.2 million kms from that fiery surface. This distance may seem large, but it is close enough to have subjected the comet to temperatures of around 2,700C. To survive such a close shave with the Sun may sound unlikely, but a few other sungrazing comets have managed the feat during even closer passes. So some people hoped ISON would perform a death-defying stunt and emerge intact. ISON did not leave us without a final serving of mystery though. Soon after reaching its nearest point to the Sun (known as perihelion), there was no sign of it emerging afterwards. Twitter and news agencies were alight, lamenting its loss and assuming it disintegrated—RIP ISON. But then, moments later, new images emerged showing a hint of something appearing on the other side of the Sun. Was this still a diminished comet ISON or a ghostly version of its former self? Well, even comet experts are not sure.'"

84 comments

  1. Ars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Good thing I already read this at Ars. I usually go there first.

  2. Ewww, nothing left but by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    ...comet brains

  3. Watch for the Fan shaped tail by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Watch for the Fan shaped tail by pr0t0 · · Score: 1

      After watching several animated gif's of the event (like this one: http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/12/comet-ison-fizzles-but-theres-a-sting-in-the-tail/), I'm left a little perplexed. I was under the impression that as a comet approaches the Sun, the heat causes outgassing and evaporation, and the tail forms as the solar wind blows that away from the comet. Accordingly, I thought a comet's tail roughly always pointed away from the sun with maybe a slight curve due to momentum. But the gif's I'm seeing don't show that. I know the comet is speeding up as it approaches the Sun, and certain gains a slingshot effect as it whips around, but I didn't think that speed would overcome the solar wind.

      Can anyone explain why the tail is still pointing in opposition to the direction of movement like jet exhaust?

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    2. Re:Watch for the Fan shaped tail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still in the process of outgassing.

    3. Re:Watch for the Fan shaped tail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After watching several animated gif's of the event (like this one: http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/12/comet-ison-fizzles-but-theres-a-sting-in-the-tail/), I'm left a little perplexed. I was under the impression that as a comet approaches the Sun, the heat causes outgassing and evaporation, and the tail forms as the solar wind blows that away from the comet. Accordingly, I thought a comet's tail roughly always pointed away from the sun with maybe a slight curve due to momentum. But the gif's I'm seeing don't show that. I know the comet is speeding up as it approaches the Sun, and certain gains a slingshot effect as it whips around, but I didn't think that speed would overcome the solar wind.

      Can anyone explain why the tail is still pointing in opposition to the direction of movement like jet exhaust?

      The icy core of the comet was pulled in towards the sun by the sun's gravity, any icy outgassing is not the core's propellant. Since the core is moving faster than the outgassing the tail will not catch up to it.

    4. Re:Watch for the Fan shaped tail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      certain gains a slingshot effect as it whips around, but I didn't think that speed would overcome the solar wind.

      The peak speed of ISON was about 370 km/s, while the typical speed of one part of the solar wind is about ~400 km/s with considerable variation.

  4. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is there any chance of it coming around and hitting us?

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      The sun is actually only the small white circle in the middle of the shade. And SOHO is only 1.5M kilometers away from Earth so the sun can’t be much larger from SOHO’s position.

      The reason for why the comet appears to be so huge is the massive coma around the core as well as the tail originating from the core and scattering like a bowwave from a ship it extends and expands the further away it is from the source. The sudden seemingly increase in size of the tail when ISON re-appears above the sun comes from the sudden change of direction and the new direction how the ejected material is forced away from the core by the solar wind.

      Most comets have a nucleus (the center of a comet) that is less than about 6 miles (10 km) wide. The size of a comet changes depending on how close it is to the sun. As a comet gets closer to the sun, the ices on the surface of its nucleus vaporize and form a cloud called a coma around the nucleus that can expand out to 50,000 miles (80,000 km). A tail also forms on a comet as it approaches the sun. Comet tails can be over 600,000 miles (1 million km) long.

      An awesome gif indeed. A little closer to home is ....

      http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/12/image-of-the-day-a-spectacular-meteor-streaking-through-the-aurora-borealis.html

    2. Re:So... by GloomE · · Score: 2

      Only if you mess with it's sister.

    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could go either way... Either it will, or it won't.

      I'd say about a 50% chance.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voothole jacksons!

  5. Maybe they should look for it by Brad1138 · · Score: 4, Funny

    in 1986...

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Maybe they should look for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one should look for anything in 1986. Ever. Let's just forget that year ever happened.

    2. Re:Maybe they should look for it by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Or 1947, in Roswell, NM. Something involving a microwave oven and a supernova.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Maybe they should look for it by arth1 · · Score: 1

      March, 1997.
      Do you have your $5.75 and Nikes, and are ready to catch the outbound flight?

    4. Re:Maybe they should look for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What smells like blue?

    5. Re:Maybe they should look for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you really don't cook enough roasts, Leela.

  6. Them darn dirty snowballs... by DrPBacon · · Score: 2

    It's like they has their own 'snow physics' or somethin'.

    --
    Spent All My Mod Points
  7. Re:More than enough to masterbate to by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    sorry, but in most the major religions that have Sun as a diety ( Ancient Egyptian, Aztec, Roman, Greek, Chinese, Bhuddist) , he's a dude. Your comets swing "the other way".

  8. No Hale Bopp "Koolaide" rerun? Rats! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    So many idiots, so few comets.

  9. Comet of the Century! Visible in broad daylight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha suckers

  10. i-Phone, i-Pad by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    ok. i'm down. i-Son.

    1. Re:i-Phone, i-Pad by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      iSon may have survived a close encounter with the intense heat of the Sun . . . but it won't survive the intense heat of Apple's IP lawyers.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  11. Dumb question, but...? by Gwala · · Score: 2

    Probably a stupid question - but wouldn't the steam/plasma presumably have the same orbit as the original solid mass; similarly presumably wouldn't the solar wind blow the mass away fairly evenly - meaning in a long long time, it'll cool, condense and potentially (slowly) pull itself back together?

    --
    #!/bin/csh cat $0
    1. Re:Dumb question, but...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no, liquidus would make it spread out and become "atmosphere" of the sun. Also there is no cooler masses lying around for it to give it's heat to, so no to the 2nd question.

    2. Re:Dumb question, but...? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      I would think the suns magnetosphere would redirect any plasma, and possibly water steam would be effected by it too.

  12. Define survived by rossdee · · Score: 0

    Define survived

    Its not like it was alive or anything

    Most of the non ice stuff will still be in pretty much the same orbit

    1. Re:Define survived by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      Remained intact and still moving

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  13. NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA got caught lying and photoshopping 'official' photos and video again.

    1. Re:NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth is, the comet is completely in tact and is now heading straight for Earth. Luckily we've been training for this scenario for 15+ years as we saw in that Armageddon documentary. I just hope the team has learned from that Deep-water Horizon training accident that NASA blamed on BP!

    2. Re:NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL dumbass doesn't realize that the cam he's looking (the one that doesn't show comet ISON) only show's extreme uv ranges. It's GOT to be a conspiracy that a space snowball doesn't radiate uv in such a way as to be completely overwhelmed by the sun. That's the only feasible and reasonable explanation.

      Dumbass.

    3. Re:NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah I guess I'm a dumbas's two for misyousing an apostrophe =) IT'S A CONSPIRACY I TELL YA! That snowball should be radiating uv WAY more than the sun I say!

    4. Re:NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA got caught lying and photoshopping 'official' photos

      I guess I'll start getting upset when I suddenly develop the ability to see in the UV spectrum.
      In case you can't get past the snark, here's a hint- it's not a visible light spectrum camera, and it doesn't "take pictures" in the manner you seem to think it does. If you're that paranoid, go download the raw data output and build your own image. Then we can watch a bunch of high-school dropouts feel smug as they call you out for your 'shopped pixels.

      idiot

    5. Re:NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! IT'S THE BLACK KNIGHT UFO ALL OVER AGAIN! Although I do have a question: it's meant to be a 13,000 year old UFO. How do we know its age? We didn't cut it open and count the rings.

    6. Re:NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see NASA's anonymous public relation/damage control team is at work again.

      You and the morons above you are complete retards, all of you, comet still show up on UV cameras.

      Proof:
      This sequence of images, gathered by an extreme UV telescope onboard NASA's STEREO-B spacecraft, shows Comet Lovejoy's tail wiggling wildly in transit through the solar corona.

      Now shut the fuck up.

    7. Re:NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see NASA's anonymous public relation/damage control team is at work again.

      You and the morons above you are complete retards, all of you, comet still show up on extreme UV cameras.

      Proof:
      This sequence of images, gathered by an extreme UV telescope onboard NASA's STEREO-B spacecraft, shows Comet Lovejoy's tail wiggling wildly in transit through the solar corona.

      So mr fucking genius, why the fuck wasn't ISON shown in NASA's video?

      Now shut the fuck up. NASA doctored the video.

    8. Re:NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA's PR would be perfectly capable of making some pseudo-anonymous screen name if that is the only thing you can use to call them out. I'm guessing it wouldn't change your opinion though, and you would just move the goal posts.

      Posting anonymously because of my employer, which is neither NASA nor because I was directly involved in that image, but because some of us don't want co-workers or boss calling us out for wasting time pointing out idiots on the internet.

      Speaking of posting anonymously to hide things, why don't you have an account?

    9. Re:NASA got caught lying again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What fucking goal post, you retards claimed comet doesn't show up on extreme UV cameras, I just proved you wrong.

      Fucking idiots.

  14. 2700 degC? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    How do they define temperature? The show happens in vacuum, there is no thermal agitation. Inside the comet this is another story, but are we able to measure the internal temperature?

    1. Re:2700 degC? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      How do they define temperature? The show happens in vacuum, there is no thermal agitation.

      Not quite vacuum but even if it would be so: black-body radiation is a measure of temperature for radiative-only cases.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:2700 degC? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      Is black body radiation reliable for something that is breaking up, with chunks turned into vapor? And I understood the comet wen hidden by the mask protecting the observing tools from direct sun light...

    3. Re:2700 degC? by c0lo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Look, you asked how to define the temperature in vacuum and I answered
      Put in a good number of assumptions and, based on them, one (with enough skill in the craft) will be able to estimate the internal temperature.
      Of course it will still be an estimate and nothing more (one doesn't need to ask, it's only natural that precise data could be obtained only if you have unambigous direct observation of the phenomenon - and not even then)

      Other than that, yes, the black-body radiation is correct for all macroscopic bodies (be them in one piece or crumbling) - the only requirements are: that body to expose a surface, be made of enough particles to display a statistical behavior and be at thermal equilibrium.
      There was this guy, Plank, that put his name at stake on the correctness of it: to date, nobody ashamed him (his initial estimation of the constant was within 1.2% of the more precise value we accept today, which is quite remarcable IMHO)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:2700 degC? by Kentari · · Score: 1

      I believe this is the estimated surface temperature on the sunlit side of the comet's nucleus. Just like the surface of the Moon and Mercury have a temperature of 390K and 670K despite not having a significant atmosphere.

    5. Re:2700 degC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While this is probably in reference to the surface temperature or of near the surface of the comet, the area around the comet and entire solar system is far from a perfect vacuum and has quite a lot of stuff within it to define a temperature. If anything, you would have more trouble defining the temperature not for lack of stuff, but due to it not being in thermal equilibrium and sometimes have to talk about temperature of different sub-populations of the interplanetary and interstellar media.

  15. Why it's named ISON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It Still Outshines Nothing

  16. No, and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The ejected material could come off at a significant velocity, so it wouldn't have quite the same orbit.
    Solar wind (and light pressure) have more effect on small particles than large ones, since they act based on surface area (r^2) against mass (r^3). This is why the solar wind can sweep dust out of the solar system, but not planets.
    There is also drag from the corona to consider. The comet effectively did an air dip.
    TL;DR Any lost material was either blown out into space, or fell into the sun. Either way, this comet will not 'pull itself back together'

  17. Really, really hot by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Moments later, new images emerged showing a hint of something appearing on the other side of the Sun. Was this still a diminished comet ISON or a ghostly version of its former self.

    What emerged from the other side was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.

  18. JSON? by belmolis · · Score: 1, Funny

    At first I read that as JSON and wondered what had happened to it.

    1. Re:JSON? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It flew too close to the Sun and lost the curve part of the J

    2. Re:JSON? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SON?

  19. Someone must have forgotten to tell me ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    In most the major religions that have Sun as a diety ( Ancient Egyptian, Aztec, Roman, Greek, Chinese, Bhuddist)

    I may be an American citizen but I am still a Chinese, by ethnicity.

    Someone must have forgotten to tell me that the Sun is a diety.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Someone must have forgotten to tell me ... by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ri Gong Tai Yang Xing Jun in Chinese mythology is "Grandfather Sun"

    2. Re:Someone must have forgotten to tell me ... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I heard his grandson's book on how to make war is real popular these days.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    3. Re:Someone must have forgotten to tell me ... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      he's adopted!

  20. You should survey the Chinese ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    Ri Gong Tai Yang Xing Jun in Chinese mythology is "Grandfather Sun"

    Why don't you go ask 100 Chinese and see how many of them ever heard of that "Ri Gong Tai Yang Xing Jun" ?

    That character is one of the many many "minor characters" inside the Chinese fiction "Tale of the Monkey God"

    Even the "Niu Mo Wang" (the Buffalo King), another character from the same tome, is more "famous" than that "Ri Gong Tai Yang Xing Jun" and yet, nobody, at least none of the Chinese that I know of, pray to that "Buffalo King".

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:You should survey the Chinese ... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      my in-laws are chinese, so I have resident reference at home 8D

      Some Chinese people from other asian countries outside China are more into the old myths. They don't worship these characters, but some know the mythologies. The Grandfather Sun (also called Taiyang Shen) is in Mahayana Bhuddist and Taoist texts too.

    2. Re:You should survey the Chinese ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your Chinese in-laws do not pray to that "grandfather sun" then it's not a diety, at least not to them.

      It is like "Zeus" or "Apollo".

      "Zeus" and/or "Apollo" are "dieties" to the believers. To you and I, "Zeus" and "Apollo" are but characters from the ancient Greek legends.

      Your original comment allude to that the Chinese treat the Sun as a "deity", to which I already pointed out to you that it is patently false, because no Chinese, at least none of the Chinese (including me, including your Chinese in-laws) pray to the Sun.

    3. Re:You should survey the Chinese ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you go ask 100 Chinese and see how many of them ever heard of that "Ri Gong Tai Yang Xing Jun" ?

      Are you saying that there's a more popular, female solar deity the Chinese are familiar with? If not, then it's not a counter-argument to the parent, it just points out that ignorance of history is just as common in China as it is pretty much everywhere else.

    4. Re:You should survey the Chinese ... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      A Taoist might indeed worship the Sun Grandfather, they have rituals for doing so in their writings. And that minor deity appears in (Mahayana) Bhuddist writings, he's a part of that religion whether average Bhuddist remembers him or not. So he's a part of Chinese religions, even if you had to look up his name

    5. Re:You should survey the Chinese ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you go ask 100 Chinese and see how many of them ever heard of that "Ri Gong Tai Yang Xing Jun" ?

      More than americans I would wager, which, considering the amount of those chiming in here would not be a bad score at all. GP was not refering to major religions, or will known religions, but to "major religions that have Sun as a diety". Leaving this one out would have been a clear omission.

      In my country, less than 20% of the people actually believe a christian God exists, it is by all means a minority religion, but leaving out christianity when discussing theistic religions certainly wouldn't lead to many people taking you serious.

  21. The "news" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friend, I think everybody and their dog who were interested in comet ISON are already aware of this "news". You have wasted your time.

  22. Re:More than enough to masterbate to by Eevee · · Score: 1

    Well, in Japanese mythology, the sun deity is most definitely a gal.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. There's still comet Lovejoy by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not to be confused with the spectacular comet Lovejoy (2011). Both were discovered by the same guy so bear his name.

    Lovejoy (2013) isn't as bright (barely visible to the naked eye), but should be easily visible with binoculars. It made its closest approach to Earth on Nov 19 and will reach perihelion (closest approach to the sun) Dec 25. It's fairly high up in the Northern hemisphere sky right now.
    http://earthsky.org/space/how-to-see-comet-lovejoy-c2013-r1-charts-photos

  25. Please make up your mind, dude ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, please make up your mind...

    You first claimed that the Chinese worship the sun deity

    ... major religions that have Sun as a diety ( Ancient Egyptian, Aztec, Roman, Greek, Chinese ...

    but now you change your tone in saying that it's the Taoists who worship the "sun deity"

    A Taoist might indeed worship the Sun Grandfather, they have rituals for doing so in their writings

    I know that your in-laws are of the ethnic Chinese, but you just can't throw around and mixing up words like "CHINESE" with " Taoists " because they are NOT THE SAME !

    As I have repeatedly said to you, I, an ethnic Chinese, and many MORE Chinese that I know of, do not worship the Sun.

    Even you have admitted that your Chinese in-laws do not worship the Sun.

    Plus, the term "Taoist" can NOT, and should NEVER be used to replace "Chinese", as there are a lot of "Taoists" that are NOT ethnic Chinese.

    There are a lot of Taoists in both Vietnam and Thailand, and they are NOT ethnic Chinese !

    It is as if I equate "White" to "Christians" or "Indians" to "Hindus".

    What you are doing is totally fallacious !

    One does not equate the other.

    Let me say this again --- there are some who are Taoists, but the vast majority of the ethnic Chinese in this world are NOT Taoists.

    Plus, there are non-ethnic Chinese who subscribe to the Taoist religion, including those from Thailand and from Vietnam.

    Make up your mind, dude.

    If you want to say the Taoists worshipping the "sun deity", go right ahead. You have no argument from me.

    Just don't mis-use "Chinese" any way you feel like it.

    Capisce ??

    1. Re: Please make up your mind, dude ! by loufoque · · Score: 1

      It of course referred to ancient chinese people. The Chinese have been around for thousands of years, the beliefs of modern chinese are irrelevant. China is also a very big area in Asia with many different peoples. In any case I wouldn't expect any modern chinese to still be burdened by religion today, especially polytheist ones.

    2. Re:Please make up your mind, dude ! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      your reading comprehension skills are lacking, I only said they had this character as a "deity", which can and does include very very minor ones, and which does not even imply worship, just that they're on a list in someone's religion as being a deity. Aside from most Chinese probably being atheists, of the ones that have a religion most would be Mahaya Bhuddhists, and THAT religion does have the Grandfather Sun on the list of (very minor) deities. QED, you lose.

  26. Re:More than enough to masterbate to by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Buddhists don't worship gods ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  27. Looks like it's finally gone: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Previous reports of Comet ISON's death may have been somewhat exaggerated, but this time it looks like the real thing [death].

    Remnants of the object once touted as the "comet of the century" passed through the viewing field of the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory in the wake of Thursday's close encounter with the sun -- and as it passed, the bright spot that survived grew dimmer and dimmer.

    "I do think that something emerged from the sun, but probably a very small nucleus or 'rubble pile.' and I fear that may have now dissolved," Karl Battams..." (Emph. added)

    http://www.nbcnews.com/science/comet-isons-leftovers-fade-away-right-satellites-eyes-2D11674277

  28. What I find really funny by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    is how, all over the interwebs, comet ISON is being described - and sometimes outright mourned - as if it had been / still were an animated being. Strange. If it had been my dog, or any dog for that matter, not surviving a close encounter with the sun - well then, hell yes. But ISON is only a chunk of dirty ice....

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  29. This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did all of these science idiots forget about conservation of mass and momentum already?

    So, the comet evaporated, disintegrated, blew up, blah blah. The mass is still there, and so is all the matter that made it up. It doesn't just disappear. It didn't get teleported somewhere else. It didn't get relativistically changed into its corresponding energy. Some change of velocity could have been realized by the evaporation of water (changing energy from the sun into energy of expanding gas), but it's entirely feasible (and likely) that a comet made of rock and ice went in one end and a cloud of dust, water vapor, and smaller stuff came out the other.

  30. Re:More than enough to masterbate to by TheMattRay · · Score: 1

    sorry, but in most the major religions that have Sun as a diety ( Ancient Egyptian, Aztec, Roman, Greek, Chinese, Bhuddist) , he's a dude. Your comets swing "the other way".

    Ah, yes. The ancient religion of "Chinese"...

  31. Comet info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.space.com/53-comets-formation-discovery-and-exploration.html

  32. Re:More than enough to masterbate to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't say anything about worship, and devas are frequently translated as deities. There is even one specific to the sun or sunlight, although in some he is a bodhisattva instead of deva.

  33. Obligatory ... by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1
    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  34. Re:More than enough to masterbate to by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    yes hundreds of millions of Buddhists do just that. In many Bhuddist countries other gods are rolled into the religion. Many have ancestor whorship. Many revere and pray to the Bhudda himself as a god. Many revere the Dalai Lama as a deity, and to oversimplify his teachings one could say he is telling people how they can become a "god"

  35. Re:More than enough to masterbate to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so why don't you complain of the ancient religion of "Greek" or the ancient religion of "Roman"?

  36. Re:More than enough to masterbate to by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    The concept of a god is in Buddism completely different than we name a god. It is only lack for a proper name that we call them gods. Most of them are as you correctly say mixed in from other religions. Most buddhists I know would call themselves atheists, as buddism is for them more a path for personal development than a religion.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  37. Re:More than enough to masterbate to by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    you could say that for various sects of any religion including Christianity, different views of "god" ranging from just a concept to a "helpful sprite" to big meanie who has already predestinated some to burn in hell

  38. Tidal forces by zap1992 · · Score: 1

    While the Sun's heat probably played a role in ISON's destruction, I think the main reason it broke up was because of the Sun's tidal forces. ISON was within its Roche limit, where the tidal effects of the Sun were enough to overpower ISON's own gravity, tearing the comet apart. Most of it is probably orbiting the Sun right now as a very small ring.