Slashdot Mirror


Swarm Mobile's Offer: Free Wi-Fi In Exchange For Some Privacy

cagraham writes "Startup Swarm Mobile intends to help physical retailers counter online shopping habits by collecting data on their customer's actions. Swarm's platform integrates with store's Wifi networks in order to monitor what exactly customers are doing while shopping. In exchange for collecting analytics, shoppers get access to free internet. Swarm then send reports to the store owners, detailing how many customers checked prices online, or compared rival products on their phones. Their platform also allows stores to directly send discount codes or coupons to shopper's phones."

27 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. Die in a fire by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your stupid mind control techniques don't need more information from spying on us, they need to go away forever.

  2. Those who would by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whose who would exchange privacy for a little internet access deserve neither.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Those who would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who are you to tell me what information I should voluntarily provide or for what reasons I should provide it?

      This isn't the government snooping on my online activities and denying it. This is me willfully entering into an agreement with a service provider.

    2. Re:Those who would by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Only the sith deal in absolutes.

  3. What's wrong with this picture? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 2

    If I'm using a phone, what the heck do I need free Wi-Fi for? The darn phone already has an internet connection.

    1. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by duckintheface · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I carry a phone with no contract or data plan. I can text and surf only from wifi.

      --
      "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
    2. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by Fritzed · · Score: 2

      Not one that will be effected by the type of browsing behavior that one would typically have while wandering a store. We aren't talking about coffee shops here where you stop and hang out for a while.

      --
      Spooooon!!!!!
    3. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I guess if you're uploading lots of selfies while browsing a store, you might want to trade your privacy for much better up speed.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      That's 600m shared between up and down, shared between all users connected to the access point.

    5. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by dyingtolive · · Score: 2

      When I'm in a store, I'm attentive toward doing precisely whatever the fuck it takes for me to get out of there sooner. The last thing on my mind is leisurely enjoying netflix on a screen the approximate size of a post-it note.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    6. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by geeper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously you're not married.

      --
      Error reading device 'Signature'. (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?
  4. Well by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 2

    So I can use this to connect to a VPN and get free internet access without any invasion of my privacy? I like it.

  5. Tough ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's things like this why the wifi on my phone is disabled when I'm not using it, and why I don't have a data plan.

    Measure that bitches. Because I'm sure as hell not providing you with the information.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Tough ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Nor yourself with much functionality.

      I provide myself with precisely the functionality I require, which is plenty good for me.

      I can go without checking my email while I'm shopping. In fact, I've been known to go an entire day without using the interwebs -- because I understand that it's just a tool, and not actually vital every moment of the day.

      And, from what I can tell, mobile internet on a phone is more than I'm willing to spend, and is mostly just a way to see even more ads and crap like that. Or, apparently provide tracking information to retailers.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Tough ... by dyingtolive · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So when the sales clerk asks for my zip code or my phone number or anything else they don't legally need, I just look at them and say "nope". If they occasionally insist (because they're idiots who have been coached to say they 'need' it), I will simply walk away from the cash register.

      That's unnecesarily confrontational, means you've lost the time sunk into being in the store to being with, and puts a burden on the poor moron who's just trying to get through another day at their miserable-ass job

      You should just realize that priv^H^H^H^Hdata-analytics is a myth, accept it, and proceed to teach them by polluting their databases with as many fake ZIP codes as you can muster. The liquor store up the street from me thinks they get visitors from Illinois, New York, Flordia, Washington state, and occasionally Alaska. My motto is "Bad data is worse than no data."

      I honestly stopped being that worried about Amazon and Google when I realized that I could make their recommendations reflect things I wouldn't have ever considered buying without actually buying anything I didn't feel like. Just looked at it, actually. Yerp, recommendations include diapers and doublesided tape. I'm single and have no kids (and not incontient), and well, doublesided tape. Hah.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  6. Re:In exchange for privacy? WHA? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    Every last site on the internet already connects to Facebook and Google and every other "social" service already.

    Privacy extensions like Ghostery and NoScript are your friend.

    I've got Google and Facebook blocked wherever I can. I'm not here to provide them with information about what I do on the internet. Some things are blocked at the firewall, and simply can't be resolved in my house.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  7. Re:Nothing New by mythosaz · · Score: 2

    Ironically, this is exactly what this service is offering the retailer -- better snooping into exactly that sort of browsing. The retailer wants to know which of their products are getting surfed for alternative buying.

  8. Re:Sure, no problem, go ahead by TheloniousToady · · Score: 2

    Finally! We're getting a little love!

    The NSA

  9. Re:Nothing New by icebike · · Score: 2

    Exactly.

    All my email or other uses of their wifi is encrypted already, and the only thing left for them to sniff is unencrypted pages from third party sellers. Even my google searches are encrypted, so they get nothing from that either.

    You can't proxy ssl. And I suspect all this service really does is route everything through Swarm Mobile's transparent proxy. Most stores simply don't have the expertise to deal with basic traffic analysis let alone deep packet inspection, so they hire Swarm.

    But as more an more shopping sites use HTTPS, this becomes less and less useful except for mining price checks on non-ssl sites.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  10. Re:In exchange for privacy? WHA? by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Every last site on the internet already connects to Facebook and Google and every other "social" service already.

    Privacy extensions like Ghostery and NoScript are your friend.

    I've got Google and Facebook blocked wherever I can. I'm not here to provide them with information about what I do on the internet. Some things are blocked at the firewall, and simply can't be resolved in my house.

    They're not my friend. I'm not losing one second of sleep about being tracked. I went all-in a couple of years ago, and the thought police haven't descended from their black helicopters yet. I'm content to be the product that Google offers it's customers. I get a pretty good return on these services. I'm happy to be able to comment on some forum random forum quickly with my Facebook account. I'm happy to have Google give me a preemptive traffic update because it knows my schedule. I'm pleased that my games keep my scores and friends cross-platform and through device upgrades.

    When my ISP started serving up ads when I mistyped a URL, I even switched to 8.8.8.8 for my DNS.

    Screw it. Google can have my data. I wasn't using it anyway.

  11. Re:Bring it on! by mlts · · Score: 3, Insightful

    VPNs should be a matter of course for anyone using Wi-Fi (barring their home/work networks, of course.) FireSheep type attacks are not as big an attack as in the past, but there are still things one can do, be it Phorm-like modification of HTTP streams in flight (perhaps injecting malware) to DNS hijacking (and there are people who will completely ignore the obvious SSL warnings and proceed no matter what, even stashing the bogus key in their root cert pool.)

    VPNs are not perfect. However, having traffic slowed or stopped is a less of an issue than having it modified in flight or just plain snooped.

  12. Re:Bring it on! by Aaden42 · · Score: 2

    Observed Traffic Pattern: Candy Crush level 263

    Analyzing . . .

    User Profile: Addictive personality, drug seeking.

    Marketing Plan: Serve coupon for free fries with McHog Burger purchase.

  13. Re:what if I just reload goatse hundreds of times? by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    Then they'll send you free coupons for psychiatric care.

  14. Re:Nothing New by pspahn · · Score: 2

    The retailer wants to know which of their products are getting surfed for alternative buying.

    Uhh... all of them?

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  15. Re:Nothing New by rk · · Score: 2

    you can't proxy ssl

    To use our service, please install our "accelerator" package that also adds our certificate to your phone. Boom. I can now proxy SSL. I wouldn't install such a thing, you probably wouldn't do it either, most people here on /. wouldn't do it, but how many "normals" would, with the promise of "Free Wifi at thousands of locations!" not understanding that their mobile device's whole security model is now compromised?

  16. Re:Nothing New by mlts · · Score: 2

    You can proxy SSL. BlueCoat sells devices which do exactly that.

    Of course, the root key will be different, but of all the users using a Wi-fi service, how many will stop what they are doing, versus click on the "bah, toss the key into the trusted root keystore regardless of security and let me proceed" button.

    I don't think this is what Swarm Mobile is doing, but if someone did try MITM-ing SSL streams, I would not be surprised if they had some success.

  17. Re:Bring it on! by Andrewkov · · Score: 2

    Their network arteries are too congested..