Slashdot Mirror
Plastic Waste Threatens Marine Diversity
Rambo Tribble writes "An article in Current Biology (abstract) details the finding that minute particles of plastic waste are affecting marine worms, potentially having grave impacts on marine biodiversity (PDF) and leading to the accumulation of toxins in marine animals. 'The team found that the tiny bits of plastic, which measure 1mm or smaller, transferred pollutants and additive chemicals — such as flame-retardants — into the guts of lugworms (Arenicola marina). This process results in the chemical reaching the creatures' tissue, causing a range of biological effects such as thermal stress and the inability to consume as much sediment.' Unfortunately, policymakers have routinely treated such wastes as benign. The BBC provides more approachable coverage of the findings."
In America there are tight regulations of the manufacturing, and transport on top of EPA. When you request a plastic bag, it's clean and it's fate is clean, plus we have profuse kandfill space available that is also tightly managed and regulated.
It is the "emerging" economies led by China and India who dump unregulated waste including heavy metals and other toxins, have dirty-technolgy, and unregulated factories that spew millions of tons of untreated air pollution and who also dump millions of tons of their plastic garbage directly into our oceans.
So you jackass hipsters at Trader Joe's keep using your filthy little burlap bags and thinking that you're making a difference while you turn a blind eye to the ecological atrocities committed by your we-are-the-world brothers.
www.chihuahuarescue.com- Help to end dog abuse, abandonment and cruelty
Dr Browne said:
"But no-one had actually shown whether chemicals could transfer from plastic when they are eaten by animals and accumulate in their bodies and reduce important functions that maintain their health."
And I thought this to be obvious, but apparently no-one ever did the research?
I always cringe when I see some plastic garbage outside and when you try to pick it up, it crumbles into tiny little fragments, sometimes powder-like.
Toxic waste, I consider this.
Some may argue that such research is pointless because pollution goes hand in hand with civilization or that we will never be able to clean up what is already out there. I disagree. Understanding how organisms are affected may give valuable insights into how pollution is and will alter the food chain. The article mentions "accumulation of toxins", this is bioaccumulation of not only different sizes and types of microplastics, it is also the bioaccumulation of the plasticizers that leach out as these microplastics degrade in a particular environment over time. Then some of these organisms are eaten by others which results in bioamplification of whatever toxins linger - mainly in fatty tissues. These organisms migrate and here you and I sit at the top of the food chain ready to devour what we assume is safe to eat. Some of the plasticizers - such as bisphenol-A (synthetic estrogen used to harden plastics) and phthalates (used to soften plastics) are well known endocrine disruptors; i.e. they mimic hormones which can alter development of offspring. Wouldn't such biological activity of these contaminants be worth studying - say in the realm of genetics - specifically epigenetics?
Food for though. Do a load of laundry that is all 100% cotton and you end up with quite a few cotton fibers in the dryer's lint filter. Do a similar size load of clothing containing synthetic fibers and notice there is far less in the lint filter and that the fibers are considerably smaller. Do another load of synthetics and filter out all of the water drained from the washing machine and take a look at what wind up in a settling pond (unless there is a storm surge that overloads the sewage system) and eventually to the ocean.
Not only are the toxins from microplastics a concern, but so are the fibers themselves which can block gills and also act as substrates for organisms from one environment to flourish upon, be transported upon and potentially become an invasive species in another environment resulting in loss of resources for the fishing industry rippling through the global economy.
Anyway, the the article says:
"But no-one had actually shown whether chemicals could transfer from plastic when they are eaten by animals and accumulate in their bodies and reduce important functions that maintain their health."
politicians' purported patronage perverts public service!
welcome our flame-retardant lugworm overlords!
... an organism may evolve that can digest some forms of plastics. Apparently when trees evolved lignin it was millions of years until fungi evolved the ability to digest it which caused it to build up leading to immense forest fires.
If we're lucky something similar will happen to plastics though given there are so many types it might be wishful thinking. Of course if it did happen we might find all our shiny toys suddenly rotting like old italian cars.
Looks like Mr. McGuire was wrong.
Humans are evil! We must kill ourselves now! I feel soooooooo guilty about my impact on the Earth! Woe is me!
You have to understand the obvious before you can really do anything realistic to help the situation. Always surprises me seeing these types of comments on slashdot.
I bet you still wash clothes made from plastic fibres in an ordinary washing machine, though. Guess where the waste goes...
The "waste" goes into a sewage treatment plant or an underground septic tank. No fibres, chemicals, or phosphates(regrettably) are dumped into any body of water.
I'm unclear on whether your post is supposed to be mocking sarcasm or a troll. Certainly it is not based in reality.
I apologise for referring you to a paywall, but this journal article does show that "chemicals could transfer from plastic when they are eaten by animals and accumulate in their bodies and reduce important functions that maintain their health."
I can't read it, due to the pay wall. But, does it say that chemicals could transfer, or does it show that chemicals do transfer. There is a huge "gulf" of difference between these two words.
We are currently developing bacteria that are capable of consuming plastics. Upon release into the environment, this will remediate the plastic pollution problem in no time. Whatcouldpossiblygowrong.
Sorry about your iPhone.
Have gnu, will travel.
If you have a 3D printer, please use PLA.
Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
Lets just reduce the population to zero then there would be no human contribution to pollution, or idiotic contributions to /. Instead why don't we spend half the amount effort to controlling real pollution that we spend on the non-existent problem of climate change? Then perhaps we could get a handle on this problem and not have so much plastic being dumped into the environment.
Watch how much it gets with PLA nano particles every where.
"If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
Fear not, climate change has the potential to reduce human population to zero.