Slashdot Mirror


Satanists Propose Monument At Oklahoma State Capitol Next To Ten Commandments

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "The Tulsa World reports that in their zeal to tout their faith in the public square, conservatives in Oklahoma may have unwittingly opened the door to a wide range of religious groups, including satanists who are now seeking to put their own statue next to a Ten Commandments monument on the Statehouse steps. The Republican-controlled Legislature in Oklahoma authorized the privately funded Ten Commandments monument in 2009, and it was placed on the Capitol grounds last year despite criticism from legal experts who questioned its constitutionality. But the New York-based Satanic Temple saw an opportunity and notified the state's Capitol Preservation Commission that it wants to donate a monument too. 'We believe that all monuments should be in good taste and consistent with community standards,' Lucien Greaves wrote in letter to state officials. 'Our proposed monument, as an homage to the historic/literary Satan, will certainly abide by these guidelines.' Brady Henderson, legal director for ACLU Oklahoma, said if state officials allow one type of religious expression, they must allow alternative forms of expression, although he said a better solution might be to allow none at all on state property. 'We would prefer to see Oklahoma's government officials work to faithfully serve our communities and improve the lives of Oklahomans instead of erecting granite monuments to show us all how righteous they are,' says Henderson. 'But if the Ten Commandments, with its overtly Christian message, is allowed to stay at the Capitol, the Satanic Temple's proposed monument cannot be rejected because of its different religious viewpoint.'"

4 of 1,251 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Fireworks in 3...2...1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Funny... reading Slashdot, it seems like it is atheists who fly off the handle any time religion is mentioned.

  2. Re:Offensive by Dzimas · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why would that be? Because the ten commandments are sensible? Three of them are "Don't work on Sunday (but don't forget to attend church so you can be indoctrinated by his earthly minions)," "Don't say bad stuff about God (and by extension, his earthly minions)," and "You're not allowed to worship other Gods but me (which once again benefits his earthly minions)."

  3. Re:Fireworks in 3...2...1... by benzapp · · Score: 0, Troll

    And so too can religion rally sufficient people to reorder society, and the law, however they see fit. Contrary to the delusions of believers in the Enlightenment faith, there are no rights. Might makes right, and quite frankly - no one is going to bother dying for something as absurd as redefining the word "marriage" contrary to its definition in every single human language on the whole planet.

    Many a gadfly has inevitably been swatted.

    The downfall of modern society is the illusion of strength that the internet provides. One need merely look at the mass propaganda agitation efforts in Eastern Europe that have been crushed with popular support with relative ease.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  4. Re:Fireworks in 3...2...1... by thunderclap · · Score: 0, Troll

    which is why the majority supports this. What the Satanists don't realize is that if they build a monument another can be built beside it mocking it. Thats the fun when you don't pick a religion. This garbage that the first amendment says you can't have any religion is bs. The govt is not sponsoring anything. Never has. There are no favorites.