Slashdot Mirror


Soviet Union Spent $1 Billion On "Psychotronic" Arms Race With the US

KentuckyFC writes "During the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union battled on many fronts to demonstrate their superior technical and scientific achievements. While the race to put a human in space and then on the Moon is famous, a much less well-known battlefront was the unconventional science of parapsychology, or psychotronics as the Soviets called it. Now a new review of unconventional research in the Soviet Union reveals the scale of this work for the first time and the cost: as much as $1 billion. The Soviets had programs studying how "human energy" could influence other objects and how this energy could be generated independently of humans using a device called 'cerpan'. The Soviets also had a mind control program similar to the CIA's infamous MKULTRA project. Interestingly, the Soviets included non-local physics in this work, such as the Aharonov-Bohm effect in which an electromagnetic field can influence a particle confined to region where the field strength is zero. And they built a number of devices that exploited the effect, although research in this area appears to have ended in 2003."

7 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. sounds like the money wasn't all wasted by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The program sounds like it had a nutty origin (like the analogous U.S. programs), but from this part:

    Interestingly, the Soviets included non-local physics in this work, such as the Aharonov-Bohm effect in which an electromagnetic field can influence a particle confined to region where the field strength is zero. And they built a number of devices that exploited the effect, although research in this area appears to have ended in 2003.

    That sounds like legitimate physics research. Research into the principle of locality is unlikely to produce a mind-controlled teleportation beam, but it has yielded a better understanding of quantum mechanics.

  2. Re:Seems reasonable enough. by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The big risk of a diversion campaign like that is if the imaginary technology turns out to be real... then we've just inspired our enemies to perfect it, while we've wasted our time.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  3. We need a new currency symbol by scorp1us · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One to indicate whether the dollar amount is inflation adjusted or not. I Imagine a $ with an arrow hat on the | So it's an up arrow and an S. That will work for talking about historical figures in current day.

    There is another problem though that is wanting to work backward, either by date or rate. So I would suggest the arrowed $, number and a divisor $14.7m/3.5 this would indicate to divide 14.7 by 3.5 to get the original dollar amount.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  4. Re:this article doesn't have enough posts yet... by bunratty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do you know it's nutty pseudoscience before you perform the experiments? It seems to me that performing the experiments and testing hypotheses is science, but dismissing an idea as nutty without performing an experiment is pseudoscience. It's belief without evidence that makes something pseudoscience, even if it's believing an idea is nutty.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  5. Re:this article doesn't have enough posts yet... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well said. Many people seem to think that everything has been discovered.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  6. Re:It's an "ology"! by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For "unconventional science" read "mumbo jumbo". Parapsychology does not qualify as science, unconventional or otherwise. It only qualifies as quackery and bullshit.

    Because it's been rebuked by research. Conducting that research, however, is what science is all about: test claims to see if they're correct.

    Heck, you could do parapsychology research today and, as long as it's properly conducted, it would be science. It's unlike such experiment would do more than confirm what's already known, but that doesn't make it "mumbo jumbo".

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  7. Re:this article doesn't have enough posts yet... by buddyglass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're right. NASA should totally fund an expedition to disprove the existence of the magical pink unicorn that many people have theorized lives on the dark side of the moon. Point being: yes, experiment, but sometimes even the decision to pursue a particular avenue of investigation is questionable.