Slashdot Mirror


US Light Bulb Phase-Out's Next Step Begins Next Month

SonicSpike writes "Light bulb manufacturers will cease making traditional 40 and 60-watt light bulbs — the most popular in the country — at the start of 2014. This comes after the controversial phasing out of incandescent 75 and 100-watt light bulbs at the beginning of 2013. In their place will be halogen bulbs, compact fluorescent bulbs, LED bulbs and high efficiency incandescents — which are just regular incandescents that have the filament wrapped in gas. All are significantly more expensive than traditional light bulbs, but offer significant energy and costs savings over the long run. (Some specialty incandescents — such as three-way bulbs — will still be available.) ... The rules were signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2007. They are designed to address gross inefficiencies with old light bulbs — only 10% of the energy they use is converted into light, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, which has a handy fact sheet about the changes. The rest is wasted as heat. But the rules have drawn fire from a number of circles — mainly conservatives and libertarians who are unhappy about the government telling people what light bulbs they can use. They argue that if the new ones really are so good, people will buy them on their own without being forced to do so."

6 of 1,146 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Seriously? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You are free to choose: that's what the ballot box is for.

    Capitalistic "freedom of choice" is weighted by the size of your wallet.

    Really, and when was the incadescent ban put to a vote of the people? No, the ballot box is only effective on things that those in power (or the people who control them) want it to be effective for.

  2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You might go back and check your calculations. What exactly is the efficiency of a heat pump when the outside air temp is below 20F like it is in the upper midwest this week?

    Pretty good, actually. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_pump#Coefficient_of_performance_.28COP.29_and_lift, so we are still talking about more than twice the efficiency of resistance heating.

  3. Re:Seriously? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You might go back and check your calculations. What exactly is the efficiency of a heat pump when the outside air temp is below 20F like it is in the upper midwest this week?

    Resistive heat, by definition, has a COP (coefficient of performance) of 1.0.

    The average heat pump has a COP of about 3.0 at 47F and only gets down to 1.0 around 0F.

    A modern heat pump with a variable speed compressor like the Carrier 25VNA should have a COP of roughly 1.5 at 0F.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  4. Re:Not 10% by zippthorne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    lumens are a weighted intensity based on human response curves. The 683 max lumens figure comes from degenerate case in which all of the spectral power is concentrated on the wavelength of peak luminous response. It's my understanding that such a lamp would be an intense, monochromatic green. But you'd really be able to see it!

    The 10% efficiency figure, I believe, is found by comparing the radiant flux (total power emitted as light) to the total power input.

    Lumens are a useful rating, if the spectrum of each lamp is comparable - it's a rough, relative comparison of the effectiveness of each lamp.

    However non-blackbody sources have a chance to game the rating by adjusting their spectrum to concentrate on the most effective wavelengths. This may be one reason why some cfls are not living up to their equivalency claims - they're hitting the lumen target, but unscrupulous manufacturers could be using a set of phosphors that puts more energy in the peak response bands and not enough outside them.

    I'm now curious as to whether there are independent spectrum analyses out there for consumers to review.

    I suppose what we need is yet another unit of measure to include the fact that although humans can see one wavelength better than all the rest, we need light across the spectrum to be able to effectively and comfortably observe our surroundings.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  5. Re:Seriously? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Capitalistic "freedom of choice" is weighted by the size of your wallet."

    I have grown so tired of this utter bullshit.

    "Crony capitalism" is not capitalism. It isn't even close. That's the reason it has a name. "Monopoly" and "oligopoly" are not capitalism. Even Adam Smith, who was basically the originator of the concept of capitalism as a system, recognized that antitrust laws to keep monopolies and oligopolies from forming were a necessary part of the strategy.

    Capitalism is about free market forces. Voluntary exchange. With the exception of antitrust, EVERY government interference in the market, and ALL corporate lobbying that ends up restricting your choices, is an ENEMY of capitalism.

    Don't blame the system for the actions of enemies of the system. That is like blaming the food for somebody burning your crops.

  6. Re:We vote on leaders not lightbulbs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You used to be able to dump all your waste in the local river rather than paying for disposal. Sorry, but we have to share the environment we live in.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC