Slashdot Mirror


Swedish Man Fined $650,000 For Sharing 1 Movie, Charged Extra For Low Quality

An anonymous reader writes "A 28-year-old man in Sweden has been fined 4.3 million SEK (~650,000 USD) for uploading one movie. 300,000 SEK of that was added because of the upload's low technical quality (Google translation of Swedish original). The court ruled that the viewer watching the pirated version of the movie had a worse experience than people watching it legally, thereby causing damage to the movie's reputation (full judgement in Swedish)."

9 of 366 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What the hell is the point of these huge number by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone knows that copy infringement is stealing - that means they must have stolen (and therefore possess) that much worth of property and so are perfectly capable of paying such a fine. Obviously.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  2. HQ Only, Please! by Elixon · · Score: 5, Funny

    The message the judge is sending is this:

    If you pirate movies then you shall do it properly! No cam, webrip, telesync or other crap! All releases that does not match BRRip quality will be punishable by law!

    Judge is obviously very tired of all that poor quality and out-of-sync crap out there. We all are!

    --
    Well, I've got to get back to work. When I stop rowing, the slave ship just goes in circles.
  3. Re:What the hell is the point of these huge number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The solution clearly is to allow repayment in the form of $650,000 worth of movies downloaded by the MPAA from the defendant.

  4. Re:What the hell is the point of these huge number by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Funny

    I concur. One low-quality copy ought to do it.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  5. Re:Low Q? by alexhs · · Score: 5, Funny

    What part of:

    I fallet med Beck-filmen beräknas skadeståndet bland annat på kostnaden för att licensiera filmen, på att delningen slagit mot försäljningen och för att den delade filmens kvalitet försämrat filmens rykte.

    can't you understand ? :)

    In preview mode, UTF-8 codes for å, ä and ö are displayed correctly. I used HTML entities in this note.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  6. Re:What happened to you Sweden? by Patent+Lover · · Score: 3, Funny

    When was Sweden ever cool?

  7. Re:What the hell is the point of these huge number by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 64x64 pixel MPEG is so low quality that it would be worth millions!

  8. Re:What the hell is the point of these huge number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You wouldn't steal a handbag.

    No, but I stole a handjob once. But then I had to give it back.

  9. Re:What the hell is the point of these huge number by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine the damages for a single pixel image!