Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Free Software Foundation Endorses a "Truly Free" Laptop

Posted by timothy on from the high-standards dept.

An anonymous reader writes "The Free Software Foundation announced today the first laptop they have been able to certify as-is that respects the user's freedoms. The laptop is free down to using Coreboot in place of a proprietary BIOS. The OS shipped on the laptop is Trisquel, the Ubuntu derived Linux OS that removes all traces of proprietary firmware, patented formats, etc. The only issue though for new customers is this endorsed laptop comes down to being a refurbished 2006 ThinkPad X60 with single or dual-core Intel CPU, 1GB+ of RAM, 60GB+ HDD, and a 1024x768 12.1-inch screen, while costing $320+ USD (200 GBP). The FSF-certified refurbished laptops are only offered for sale through the Gluglug UK shop. Are these outdated specs worth your privacy and freedom?"

9 of 340 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by twocows · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I support the FSF, but I can really just install free software on my own computers. This even includes coreboot usually. And they're a lot less expensive and a lot more powerful. I suppose it might be good to buy if your child needs a laptop or something.

    1. Re:Well... by briancox2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I get the sense that the FSF, though having some very good ideals, has no understanding of the importances of "just works" and "value added".

      --
      We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
    2. Re:Well... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it's not truly free unless it comes with exactly zero mysterious binary blobs calling home (or NSA, which may be the same thing).

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Well... by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have a strange definition of freedom.
      A laptop with free hardware and free software let me do whatever with it, including signing up for pseudo-voluntary profiling in exchange for a meager chunk of ad ridden web service.

      GNU licensed stuff poses additional restriction but those are aimed at the respect of others' freedom, in the same way that "do what you wish" makes a less free society than "do what you wish as long as it lets other do what they wish", no matter the smaller number of restrictions imposed.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  2. "Truly free", but with Intel inside(tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously. I laughed.

  3. Re:Umm, okay, but... by Kardos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Creating free replacements for all non-free software is a monumental task that started many years ago, one that may never be complete. However, this is a milestone; the list of laptop models that are "truly free" can only expand from here, as can the includeable software. Have you seen the DD-WRT compatibility list recently? It was quite short a when that project was getting started.

  4. FSF does free; they do step one, others step two by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > no understanding of the importances of "just works"

    That's not their part of the job.

    Various entities can label something as user-friendly. FSF is pretty much the only entity that can label stuff as free.

    This is one laptop. Hopefully next year there'll be twenty, and then someone can take on the job of announcing which is the most user-friendly of the twenty free laptops.

    --
    Expert in software patents or patent law? Contribute to the ESP wiki!
  5. Liberated CPUs by unixisc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, RMS goes w/ Loongson, so since the FSF is putting this together, why don't they just team up w/ Lemote, slap Trisquel (or gNewSense) on the laptop, fire it up w/ GNOME3, and put it out to market? Better yet, if they can find someone to fab the OpenRISC chip, or come out w/ an GPLed version of a SPARC (where its HDL designs are GPLed) and fab it, and design it into a laptop, w/ coreboot, they'll get what they want.

    Remember, for an FSF endorsement, it doesn't need to be good, or even run end user software. It just needs to 'respect your freedom & privacy', so the solution above should do it.

  6. Re:FSF does free; they do step one, others step tw by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a definition of fundamentalism, it certainly isn't the definition of fundamentalism that is common short-hand for extremist asshole. The FSF does not qualify for the extremist asshole definition, not by a long shot.