Slashdot Mirror


Panoramic Picture Taken By China's Moon Lander

Taco Cowboy writes "Perhaps it's not much, but China has released a panoramic view of the moonscape where their lander has landed. They 'stitched' up some 60 photos taken by 3 cameras on the Chang'e 3 lander, taken from 3 different angles — Vertical, 15 degrees up, and 15 degrees down. From the picture, there is a significant sized crater is seen, several meters wide, off to the left of Yutu, the (jade rabbit) moon rover, and located only about 10 meters away from the Chang'e-3 lander."

32 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. It's 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And this is the best image quality their chosen on-board imaging device can deliver?

    1. Re:It's 2013 by Bradmont · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yea, like, couldn't they, like, just stick an iPhone on that thing, LOL?!?

    2. Re:It's 2013 by DrPBacon · · Score: 2

      Well...? Why couldn't they...?

      --
      Spent All My Mod Points
    3. Re:It's 2013 by mwissel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because it won't have signal up there, stupid.

    4. Re:It's 2013 by vikingpower · · Score: 2

      Ever heard of hard radiation ? Any consumer-grede device would only survive for minutes up there.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    5. Re:It's 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yup, I did the calculations and it would be very close to $20,000. The weight of the device would add ~$10 to the total cost of fuel required, plus $100 to buy the iPhone itself and $19,890 over 2 years for the contract to get an iPhone subsidised down to $100 in the first place.

    6. Re:It's 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Try it, it looks sharper if you squint your eyes.

    7. Re:It's 2013 by number6x · · Score: 5, Funny

      You left out the roaming charges.

    8. Re:It's 2013 by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      They bolted it to the chassis wrong?

      --
      No sig today...
    9. Re:It's 2013 by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seems to me that the nano/micro-sat crowd is demonstrating that to not really be as much of an issue.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    10. Re:It's 2013 by kimvette · · Score: 2

      They did, but they have no signal because the rover is holding it wrong.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    11. Re:It's 2013 by cusco · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those are mostly operating below the Van Allen belts, aren't they? There's no such protection on the moon.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    12. Re:It's 2013 by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those roaming charges are going to be....
      astronomical.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    13. Re:It's 2013 by bbsalem · · Score: 2

      Why, it would be sheer lunacy!

  2. Water discovered on the Moon! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's right there, on the lens, blurring everything!

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  3. Spacecraft just went to sleep by mbone · · Score: 4, Informative

    CCTV just announced that the Sun has set at Mare Imbrium and the Chang'E lander and the Yutu rover both have gone to sleep for the night.

  4. NOT a Chinese released panorama by mbone · · Score: 5, Informative

    The image linked to is apparently from the Universe Today. As the linked article says :

    To make it easier to see and sense ‘the new view from the Moon’, we have created screen shots from the rather low resolution TV broadcast and assembled them into a photo mosaic of the landing site - see above and below mosaic by Marco Di Lorenzo and Ken Kremer.

    That's why it's fuzzy. It's screen scraped from a TV.

    1. Re:NOT a Chinese released panorama by markdavis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >That's why it's fuzzy. It's screen scraped from a TV.

      Well, certainly doesn't look like any "TV" I have been watching for the last many years!

      China- the 1950's called and would like their equipment back now, if you are done with it.

    2. Re:NOT a Chinese released panorama by mbone · · Score: 2

      I imagine it was a std def broadcast.

      Chang'E 3 has several cameras (as does the YuTu rover), following the MER standard of having "science," "navigation" and "hazard avoidance" cameras. One of the Lander camera pointing systems was designed in Hong Kong; I suspect that system made these images.

      Note - some of the published images were high-def (16:9 ?) and were just aired as 4:3 on the TV broadcasts, making the lander (to me) look squished on screen and screen-shots.

    3. Re:NOT a Chinese released panorama by CanEHdian · · Score: 2

      Chang'E 3 has several cameras (as does the YuTu rover)

      The rover's cameras cannot be used following an emergency injunction order from YouTube for trademark infringement. :-)

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    4. Re:NOT a Chinese released panorama by lolococo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, in fact one of the commenters in this article linked to a set of much nicer pictures

  5. Is this faked too? by mu51c10rd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, the Gobi desert looks eerily familiar to the Nevada desert...

    1. Re:Is this faked too? by madhatter256 · · Score: 2

      Or that studio out in Roswell where they shot the landings...

      --
      Previewing comments are for sissies!
  6. Clearly this has been Photoshopped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I'm sure China didn't pay for the license.

    1. Re:Clearly this has been Photoshopped. by Roskolnikov · · Score: 2

      Oh, they likely paid for one license..... and it is owned by the people :)

      --
      Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  7. Re:Huh by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Interesting

    do you have any source for your claim that "multitudes" "starve and die", or did you make that nonsense up? Here's a fact for you, hunger rate in U.S. much higher than China

  8. Firefly by mrflash818 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...good for them!

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  9. Hugin by ka9dgx · · Score: 2, Informative

    They should have used Hugin, an open source GUI based on Panotools, for stitching that panorama, it could have dealt with the uneven light levels caused by falloff of the CCD, and made a much, MUCH nicer panorama out of it.

    They need to visit the Vignetting page to learn how to fix things.

  10. The Moon: A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)

    Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors .. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.

    Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!

    Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  11. Re:Huh by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chang'e-1, -2 and -3 **COMBINED** have cost about a billion dollars, or less than a dollar per Chinese citizen. The first two were orbiters/mappers, the third is the lander, all three have been complete successes so far. That war in Iraq that (IIRC) you were so enthusiastic about a few years ago? Cost of that is over $3,500 per US citizen. It was an utter failure.

    Even if this was just propaganda I think the Chinese have gotten the better deal.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  12. Re:Huh by mbone · · Score: 2

    And, Chang'E 2 then went on and flew by Asteroid (4179) Toutatis, as a bonus, for a tiny fraction of the cost of a new spacecraft launch.

    Scheduling that a few months in advance with a spacecraft that was not intended for deep space puts China up in the first ranks of spacefaring nations IMHO.

  13. Re:Huh by Sperbels · · Score: 2

    Chinese Jet Pilot is a reference from the movie Army of Darkness. It's like saying: Yeah, and I played darts with queen of England. I believe he's saying your full of shit.