Slashdot Mirror


USA Today Names Edward Snowden Tech Person of the Year

An anonymous reader writes with an excerpt from the USA Today tech column: "...But until a lone information-technology contractor named Edward Snowden leaked a trove of National Security Agency documents to the media this summer, we didn't know just how much we'd surrendered. Now that we do, our nation can have a healthy debate — out in the open, as a democracy should debate — about how good a bargain we got in that exchange. For facilitating that debate, at great risk to his own personal liberty, Snowden is this column's technology person of the year for 2013."

20 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. If ever there was a "Conscience Award" ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Edward Snowden is a shoe in.

    Of the untold numbers of spooks working in / for NSA, Ed Snowden is the only one who has the conscience and the courage to reveal the dastardly unconstitutional secrets of the NSA.

    Thanks, Mr. Snowden, for what you have done for the country !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:If ever there was a "Conscience Award" ... by maugle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The NSA is a spy agency by charter. Spies can and do go beyond the letter of the law in order to fulfill their mission of protecting their country from its enemies... it would be shocking if they didn't.

      This is America. Nobody is supposed to be above the law, especially the government.

      Congress may not be concerned with the NSA's actions, but they've already proven themselves willing to trade away our freedoms wholesale so that they can claim to be "tough on terror" during the next election cycle. We need to hold their feet to the fire and make them reign in the NSA.

    2. Re:If ever there was a "Conscience Award" ... by deconfliction · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was beautiful. I only wonder if we'll see the day when Snowden, Manning and Assange are granted freedom. And when the inmates at GITMO are allowed to tell their stories in complete detail, and we are allowed to hear them.

  2. Re:USA Today by easyTree · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are the corrupt power-mongering double-talking ghouls gonna do? "Oh yeah, we're the bad guy. Sue us" ?

  3. Consequences more for World - USA by jkrise · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my view; the revelations have far more impact for nations in the World other than the USA (you know; such nations do exist; and are home to 20 times more people than in the US). But when the Internet is controlled largely by the US; and these revelations indicate even more erosion of other nations' peoples' rights; the debate must include the entire World. One fears that just like the US Presidential debate; the implications for the rest of us will be ignored totally.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  4. We all know that already by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are the corrupt power-mongering double-talking ghouls gonna do? "Oh yeah, we're the bad guy. Sue us" ?

    They do not need to tell us.

    We already know.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  5. Re:Edward Snowden is a god damned TRAITOR by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Edward Snowden is a big a danger to the US today as the Soviet Union was 4 years ago.

    No argument there...

  6. Re:Edward Snowden is a god damned TRAITOR by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bullshit, the traitors are those in government ignoring the constitution and illegally spying on the citizenry. It needs to stop now.

  7. Re:USA Today by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    . . . meanwhile, all USA Today employees can be sure that their emails are being read and their phones tapped.

    . . . you have the right of speech in America . . . and now the NSA and the FBI have the right of free listen.

    Oh, and USA Today can expect a tough audit from the IRS next year.

    I'm guessing that 2014 will be the year of "The War On Surveillance" . . . but like all other "The War On" wars . . . it is doomed to be lost.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  8. The press and the people... by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...are divided as usual, but many seem to applaud what he did. I do.

    The government however is not divided that I can see. They want his ass on a platter. Strung up, drawn and quartered with his parts sent to the four corners of Scotland as a message. This is telling in this day and age of 'partisan' bickering to keep the masses distracted with largely inconsequential issues. Patriotism is not serving in office. Or recording every bit of data you can weakening our country, technology and economy in the process, to supposedly protect us. It is not giving lip service to the constitution, while you wipe your arse with it by your actions.

    It is about standing up. It is about saying wait, this is NOT what MY country is supposed to be. It is about being able to stand up to a Tory, or a Tea Partier, or a Donkey and saying "fuck you, give me my rights, give me my liberty, or give me death", to paraphrase Patrick Henry. It is not in cow towing to the powers that be, but resisting the ever reaching yoke of the powerful.

    But we don't stand by and large. We listen to Fox news and MSNBC talking heads and nod. We scream at our football games or hope to see a blurred nipple slip on TMZ. We laugh at cat memes and snapchat sext our co-workers while the spouse is away. We wonder at the changes in the climate then get into our unneeded and wasteful SUV.

    What happened to our spine? The one that beat the brits? The one that helped show Germany and Japan where they could put it when they wanted to remake the world into their bleak image? Why are we more interested in goatse, and goth chicks and godzilla than righting our government? Why can 10 random people not discuss issues without at least 1 to 2 people completely derailing any progress? Why do we continually bend over while those in power plum our innermost depths to their own ends?

    I wish I knew the answers. I though many of these thoughts as a teen 20 years ago. Then I had the optimism to think that we were on the brink. That we would stand, that a revolution was imminent. That the way things were would be changed and we had the power to do it. I was cynical then, but had hope. Now I think I am a defeatist. I would like more than just a few people to prove me wrong. The Snowdens of the world are currently the exception that proves the rule. Why is this?

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:The press and the people... by shadowofwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People were more aggressive and less risk adverse in the past, and not as self-absorbed, but for the most part were never willing to stand up for what was right. For example, when Thomas Paine was in prison in France, the founding fathers left him hung out to dry. Nobody stood up to stop the genocide against Native Americans. There was a regional power struggle between the north and south US, which had different cultures, but poor southern white men did essentially nothing to help black men. America fought Germany because Germany declared war on the US, not because they were willing to fight Fascism, and the US did very little to help Jews escape. America fought Japan because they were pissed about Peal Harbor, not because of what Japan was doing in China. Very much of the domestic opposition to the war in Vietnam came from people who wanted to stay home, enjoy benefits of birth control pills, penicillin, and smoke weed, not because they had a more principled objection. I could go on.

      I think its possible to understand a lot about "why this is", but we've got to be willing to give up our own vanity, and face the possibility that our ideals not only will not but can not be realized in anything like the form and time-frame that we may have hoped for. Our problems go very, very deep, its not like humanity just went off the tracks a few decades ago or even a few thousand years ago. Study animal behavior closely and you'll see that its all fucked up to, in pretty much the same ways. Maintaining idealism in the face of this takes an incredible patience, and a kind of courage. If we value courage, here's something to prove ourselves on maybe.

  9. Re:USA Today by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And yet by the government he is named as traitor and fugitive.

    And thus he rode off into the files of History.

    History is full of people authority called scoundrels, but the people have loved them.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  10. Congratulations! Peace prize next! by Zibodiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He deserves all the recognition we can give him. Whether he did things the right way or not, he did what he thought he should do for the good of Americans, even though he knew it would result in his becoming a refugee in another country, or possibly imprisoned and tortured here in the states. He didn't do it for money, and I doubt he did it for fame; he did it because his conscience told him he had to. He is a patriot who deserves to be treated as one. Here's to hoping he gets a Nobel Peace Prize.

  11. I remember when... by ApplePy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back in my day, the *Russian* spooks defected *to* the *USA*.

    Now get off my lawn!

    Except that's damnably creepy when you think about what a change that is.

    --
    That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
  12. Re:USA Today reported on NSA's spying in *2006* by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ironic, then that it was USA Today who first broke the story about NSA warrantless wiretapping and phone metadata collection ***in 2006***

    And they had... what evidence, exactly? "Inside anonymous sources" is not the same as thousands of pages of documentation. That old article had very few details, no proof, no names, and nothing that actually proved anything whatsoever. Snowden showed what was actually going one, that it was illegal, and exactly how far it went.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  13. Enough of these government shills by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    LOL all these "anonymous cowards" posting pro-government public relations. If they're tonguing government's balls why would they need anonymity? I smell government public relations all paid for with your taxpayer dollar.

    Way to ignore another story and the FISA finding that the government was breaching the Constitution. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/16/judge-nsa-surveillance-fourth-amendment/4041995/ http://news.firedoglake.com/2013/08/22/fisa-court-ruled-nsa-program-unconstitutional-said-nsa-misled-them/ That you're ignoring these smacks of a shill. The right and left are united on this. On the other side are government workers like yourself living a parasitic existence off the hard-working taxpayer.

    > Snowden is a sellout who took what he had and likely ran to the highest bidder with the info.
    Not a shred of evidence do you have. Now get a real fucking job, you piece of shit government shill.

  14. Re:Correct! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... who was Time's Person of the Year in 2001? Osama Bin Laden, naturally?... no, it was Rudy Guliani.

    Remember that this choice was made a little less than four months after 9/11, and the popular reaction to the event was so bad that women in California were ordering their dogs to attack people who "looked Muslim" at freeway rest areas. Time is published from New York City, ground zero for the bulk of the attacks.

    I suspect they figured that if they gave Osama the title there'd be another building brought down - by New Yorkers with sledgehammers.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  15. Re:USA Today reported on NSA's spying in *2006* by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Personally, I feel Obama should give his Nobel to Snowden. He deserves it far more, and is risking his life to let the world know what's going on. And I'm in the same boat too...finally the "it's not paranoia when they really are after you" has been proven to be true to the rest of the population.

  16. Re:USA Today reported on NSA's spying in *2006* by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's proof enough that Snowden matters that we're talking about this now and we weren't in 2006.

  17. Re:USA Today by daem0n1x · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nobody gave them those powers. They just took them, and most people didn't give a fuck. The few that gave a fuck were rapidly silenced by the Corporate Propaganda Machine, a.k.a. The Media.