Slashdot Mirror
Federal Judge Rules Chicago's Ban On Licensed Gun Dealers Unconstitutional
wooferhound writes with news that a federal judge has overturned part of Chicago's firearm laws. From CNN: "A federal judge ruled Monday that Chicago's ban on virtually all sales and transfers of firearms is unconstitutional. 'The stark reality facing the City each year is thousands of shooting victims and hundreds of murders committed with a gun. But on the other side of this case is another feature of government: certain fundamental rights are protected by the Constitution, put outside government's reach, including the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense under the Second Amendment,' wrote U.S. District Judge Edmond Chang."
The Chicago Tribune notes: "The ruling also would make it legal for individuals to transfer ownership of a firearm as a gift or through a private sale as long as the recipient was at least 18 and had a firearm owner's identification card." The ruling doesn't change anything yet: the ruling's effect was delayed to give the city time to appeal.
How many crimes were perpetrated with fully automatic machine guns? How many school killings were committed with one? How many people in the USA died at the wrong end of a fully automatic assault rifle?
Clearly, having a full auto rifle would help the sick person achieve his goals more efficiently.
I'll tell you why there are so few deaths from fully automatic assault rifles: gun control works.
What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
Hold the phone here: The constitution says that we have the right to own and possess guns, yet makes no mention of the right to sell them. I'm actually 100% positive what Chicago did here was not illegal
All your 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 are belong to us
Chicago has such a huge murder rate for two reasons. One, it's gun laws are way too lax. People are still allowed to buy guns there. Two, those laws are not strictly enforced enough. There are no common sense door to door searches. If either of those things were true, they wouldn't have a problem. Instead, we have Republicans that lobby to make gun crimes worse in Chicago. They even call it Shitcago to demonstrate their hate. They hate the place so much they want fewer gun laws which will create more murders. That is what you are asking for.
The gun people want to keep their guns. Why are the anti gun people fighting them? They say it is to save lives.
Because it's not. Well, not the overall number of lives in general. They want less Jefferson, more Kim Jung Un, and feel that going in that direction will increase their *personal* safety, nevermind the statistics (this isn't about reason, it's about fear).
After all, somebody needs to control the stupid people (who aren't them, of course), and they're not about to let natural rights get in the way of having _their_ gang run things their way (with guns).
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
Why in the 21st century there is the need of carrying a gun? Only by stupidity... and a 200 year old constitution...
In Europe, and in most civilized countries, it's very easy: only cops and criminals have guns, this way is very easy to distinguish a common citizen from both, specially because cops use uniforms.
If common citizens do carry guns, then it's very easy from them to try to be cops ending to become criminals sometimes just because they carry a gun.
Modern civilizations don't need guns! Only comboys.
Cheers.
Essentially all the criminal guns were legally made and legally sold (the first time). They were stolen and then used criminally. If you disarm the population, you eliminate the #1 source of guns for criminals.
Learn to love Alaska
| Tell that to a black man in Mississippi circa 1964. There are a few that might tell you how the only thing that stood between their home and family, and a dozen angry klansmen with torches, was a 12ga shotgun and the will to use it.
Are you nuts? What do you think would happen one minute after a black man threatened a white man with a weapon in 1964 in Mississippi? Hundreds of men with guns would invade the black neighborhood, backed up by the local and state police.
The only thing that might stand in 1964 between their family and a few dozen klansmen with torches and GUNS was the willingness of the Federal government to intervene with force.