Slashdot Mirror
Ampere Could Be Redefined After Experiments Track Single Electrons Crossing Chip
ananyo writes "Physicists have tracked electrons crossing a semiconductor chip one at a time — an experiment that should at last enable a rational definition of the ampere, the unit of electrical current. At present, an ampere is defined as the amount of charge flowing per second through two infinitely long wires one meter apart, such that the wires attract each other with a force of 2×10^-7 newtons per meter of length. That definition, adopted in 1948 and based on a thought experiment that can at best be approximated in the laboratory, is clumsy — almost as much of an embarrassment as the definition of the kilogram, which relies on the fluctuating mass of a 125-year-old platinum-and-iridium cylinder stored at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Paris. The new approach, described in a paper posted onto the arXiv server on 19 December, would redefine the amp on the basis of e, a physical constant representing the charge of an electron."
Because a few atoms of the slug can sublimate into the surrounding atmosphere, even at room temperature. And because a few atoms of the surrounding atmosphere can adhere to the slug. And yes, at the precision we're talking about here, it makes a difference.
Well, yes. But the point here isn't shuffling around the units. The point here is to increase the accuracy at which the elementary charge is known, which would be necessary whether you're defining the Ampere in terms of the charge or the Coulomb in terms in the charge. Currently, we know the elementary charge to ten decimal places. That's not good enough, so that's what this is about--finding out that figure to greater accuracy so it can be used as a universal measurement standard. For comparison, the definition of the second is accurate to 15 decimal places.
Technically no. As noted above, the Ampere, not the Coulomb, is the fundamental unit. A Coulomb is an Ampere-second.
This is not entirely correct. Ampere is an SI base unit while Coulomb is a SI derived unit (defined as 1 C = 1 A s) - not the other way round.
That approach is in fact one of the proposals for a replacement to the kilogram. The problem is counting 10^23 atoms of a material (and getting pure material to work with).
"None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
It is kept in air, but under bell jars. Way more than you ever wanted to know here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram#Stability_of_the_international_prototype_kilogram
You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office