Slashdot Mirror
Adobe Adds 3D Printer Support To Photoshop
angry tapir writes "Adobe has rolled out an update to Photoshop that incorporates direct support for 3D printing. According to Adobe, they don't expect most users to directly create 3D meshes in Photoshop. Instead they expect most of the time people will import objects from other applications and then use Photoshop as a finishing tool to tweak and repair meshes — in a similar fashion to how Photoshop can be used to tweak photos before production. The application currently directly supports MakerBot printers and the online Shapeways service. More printer support is coming (printer profiles are editable XML files) and the application can also export STL files that can be copied to a USB drive and used on other brands of 3D printer."
Some more features that I won't know how to use in PS! Seriously, this is great. But it does make PS even more intimidating - wow, the learning curve is already steep!
Now we can airbrush our 3D printed sex bots.
I'm waiting until they add the kitchen sink and rename the project adobe franken-shop. come on, photo editing, then video editing, now 3d cad? I swear they just keep adding in items so people feel they are getting value from the upgrades. OR they want to help out the massive (and lucrative) training economy built around the wonderful (and intuitive) user interface in Photoshop.
I'm sorry, but to me that doesn't make sense. Photoshop is a program to manipulate raster images, that is, 2-dimensional arrays of coloured pixels. 3D printing simply doesn't fit in here.
I mean, there's nothing wrong with Adobe making a program for 3D printing. They also can bundle it with Photoshop, that's a pure business decision. But it simply doesn't make sense to add that functionality to the Photoshop program itself. Three are almost no operations which make sense for both raster image editing and 3D printing.
Gimp developers - please don't feel obliges to play catch-up and incorporate this. It should be a separate application.
...how the software-subscription/lending business model is working out for adobe?
Whose brilliant idea was it to add something that has nothing to do with photoshop?
2D image editing and 3D modeling are two completely seperate things that share almost nothing. I'd be surprised if they shared anything beyond the basic interface.
I don't understand why something like this would be included in Photoshop. "Kitchen sink" applications are usually a bad idea: you want your app to do one thing very well, not a bunch of different things poorly. "One thing" can be defined pretty broadly (2D still image editing, in Photoshop's case), but you need some level of focus. And it's not like there aren't still more important things to fix: the Windows version of Photoshop still does not play nice with HiDPI, and there is still no support at all for the Windows Ink API (so tablets which don't support WinTab for patent reasons can't even get basic pressure sensitivity). Adobe is aware of these issues, but they'd rather add silly glitz that no one will use instead of fixing these rather significant bugs.
Symantec now offering Norton Antivirus for 3D printers.
Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
I can't wait to see the Fark Photoshop contests for 3D printers. Or better yet, give your crescent wrench huge tatas.
Well, over 1 million people have signed up as of 24 September or so: http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2013/september/creative-cloud-1-millionth-user
which sounds impressive, until one recalls that for its 20th anniversary, Adobe announced PhotoShop had over 10 million users.
There's also no word on how many of these people have merely signed up for a 30 day free demo / trial.
Adobe's initial estimation was that only one-third or so (~4 million) of their customer base (~12 million) would initially sign up: http://www.cmswire.com/cms/customer-experience/adobes-creative-cloud-gamble-pays-off-handsomely-even-if-q2-earnings-crash-021396.php
So they're still far short of their initial estimate.
An Adobe CEO admitted to the disappointment and a need to tweak things: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/19/adobe_q2_customers_disappointed_with_no_boxed_wares/
but I've still not seen any change --- just more patches and up-dates. My suspicion is that Adobe planned this a long while ago, identifying the last few product features which would be essential for profitability of users and the most difficult for a competitor to implement, then deferring implementing them until after they introduced Creative Cloud.
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
Could it be because nobody is buying their stupid new subscription-only version of Photoshop, and this is a desperate attempt to make it tempting again?
Yeah, that's probably it.
What they mean is that you will have to tweak your models to get them to display right when you import them to photoshop because as usual, photoshop will do an absolutely horrible job of working with any non-adobe format. Lets face it, unless this is 10 to 100 times better than their SVG import support, this will be utterly useless.
If they can't even import/export SVGs or EPS correctly who the hell is going to use them for 3d models.
Adobe needs to die. I'm not sure when the shark was jumped, but I'm certain it came before CS3 after which I refused to buy another Adobe product as they are the ONLY FUCKING THING BESIDES STEAM THAT HAS A PROBLEM WITH CASE SENSITIVE FILESYSTEMS ON a Mac, I want to say it happened before CS existed.
This of course made it easy for me to deal with the transition they made to rental only model since I don't have to rent shit from them.
Of course, we spent the better part of a year retooling our software systems to get off adobe formats and move to open formats like SVG, so we don't exactly have a problem finding tools anymore.
Oh, wow, so Adobe is going to start supporting 3D printers.
Hey, wait - aren't Adobe those guys who were so adamant about DRM on their new software release they thought making it a subscription based service was a good idea?
Considering the source, I don't trust that this isn't just a power move on Adobe's part to get in on the ground floor of locking down your property (in this case, your 3D printer).
An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
That doesn't say anything. One can always cook the books to make things look spectacular.
Wake me up when their good streak continues for a second or third year in a row.
You can look at: how many people did they hire? If they hired no-one and laid off a lot, it means the ship is sinking.
If you have a 3D printer that can print with clay, you could use Adobe to design, print and build your adobe house!
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
Fascinating. Because when I think poor quality fragile plastic trinkets, I'm definitely worried about the quality of the finish.
How did they incorporate 3D modelling, which mostly uses 3D vector-based drawing, into a 2.5D pixel-based application?
Anything that I cannot run entirely from my computer without a subscription does not get put on my computer. When I purchase software, I expect it to run, not demand a subscription payment. #d printing is immaterial as there are many programs that do that.
There are still a lot of holes to be filled before PhotoShop finally fulfills its natural born role of all-round swiss army knife of um... everything we could possibly imagine. Why can't I make phone calls from PhotoShop? Why can't I bake a cake in PhotoShop? This isn't rocket science!
and it will now take 1 minute longer to load, use more ram, have more useless menus to navigate past, etc...
ob xkcd
I think that's the first in /.'s history when a goatse picture is actually on topic.
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
So now there will be an additional 20 items in my context menu when I right-click on a jpg?
Now 'designers' will believe even more that they can be engineers.
It's simple. They have been running out of ways to improve Photoshop. Once they realized this, they switched to a subscription only business model. Now they can roll out meager "upgrades" in drips and drabs without the pressure of having to create a whole new version of the software. I expect Adobe will update/upgrade the 3D portion of Photoshop the most over the next two years simply because there will be a lot of features they CAN add. Photoshop itself already does just about everything it needs to be able to do. Also, Adobe has been trying to crack the 3D problem for fifteen plus years now. Where the "3D problem" is how does Adobe sell 3D.
When are they going to add 3D printing support to Blender. Design your part in Blender, hit "print" and out comes a piece of plastic.
3D printing. Good.
Cloud. Bad.
Subscription. Bad.
Adobe loses 2 out 3.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hershey-3d-systems-to-develop-printable-foods-2014-01-16-94853813
Soon eating will require an Adobe subscription.