Slashdot Mirror


Nagios-Plugins Web Site Taken Over By Nagios

New submitter hymie! writes "Nagios is a commonly used IT tool that monitors computers, networks, and websites. It supports the use of plug-ins, many of which were developed independently by the community. Holger Weiß, formerly of nagios-plugins.org, announced that 'Yesterday, the DNS records [of nagios-plugins.org] were modified to point to web space controlled by Nagios Enterprises instead. This change was done without prior notice. To make things worse, large parts of our web site were copied and are now served (with slight modifications) by Nagios. Again, this was done without contacting us, and without our permission. This means we cannot use the name 'Nagios Plugins' any longer.' Further discussion is available in a Bugzilla thread."

19 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Shitting all over your most supportive users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is not a viable long term strategy.

    1. Re:Shitting all over your most supportive users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, but Nagios hasn't cared much about it's users for some time now. It worked when they were the only game in town[1], but these days you can choose to use Icinga or even Sensu; both of which are far better products than Nagios and support Nagios plugins.

      [1]: Well O.K, there's OpenNMS, but that's network oriented rather than infrastructure so it's not a direct comparison.

    2. Re:Shitting all over your most supportive users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Give Zabbix a try, you'll be surprised. Much better flexibilty and easier to tie into active directory for authentication.

      http://www.zabbix.com/

    3. Re:Shitting all over your most supportive users by jon3k · · Score: 3, Informative
      http://www.zabbix.com/license.php

      If you use ZABBIX in a commercial context such that you profit by its use, we ask that you further the development of ZABBIX by purchasing some level of support.

      Just fair warning.

  2. Re:Copyright violation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sue Nagios.

    Are you related to Sally Nagios?

  3. Switched to Icinga a long time ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    So far I have not looked back once.

  4. Re:similar by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like Nagios Plugins was a community project to provide plugins for Nagios, with little to no input by Nagios themselves. At some point in the past, the website name was transferred to Nagios to avoid trademark issues but the project continued to be community driven and led. Now, Nagios has redirected the DNS to its own plugins website, forked the community codebase, setup an entirely new developer base and taken the company line that "monitoring plugins (the name chosen by the original nagios-plugins project leads) is the fork, not us".

    Reading the propaganda by the Nagios rep on the bugzilla thread is highly amusing, smacks of Eurasia and East Asia from 1984.

    If all of this is even mildly true, its quite an evil thing by Nagios to do.

  5. Re:Suprise, not really by paziek · · Score: 3, Informative

    They (Nagios Enterprises) requested it. I didn't see mention of why they did, but I would guess it was trademark issue. They were supposed to let them use it independent of Nagios Enterprises, but seems like 3 years was all they could get on this deal. From what I read in their discussion, reason for takeover are mentions of compatible competition on main site of old Nagios Plugins.

  6. Distro packaging mess by paziek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It will be interesting to see who will provide source for packages used by various distros. Those plugins can be used by other monitoring applications and I guess that new maintainers on the old domain could release version of their plugins that would not work with competition, while at the same time old maintainers probably shouldn't use nagios-plugins for their packages.

  7. Re:Not a registrar problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    So really the company just decided they want control of the server now instead of pointing their domain to a third party. Nonstory.

    You apparently decided to read the article on this occasion, but inexplicably stopped after the second link.

    3.3/10 for effort but could try harder.

  8. Re:Not a registrar problem. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Informative

    The story is a but more than that - they took the website almost as-is, forked the codebase and are portraying themselves as the original project with a new developer base, insisting the original developers are the fork.

    If they had switched the domain to a brand new website and started from scratch, that would be your non-story...

  9. Re:Copyright violation. by xQx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This battle was lost years ago when this volunteer organisation gave control of their domain to Nagios Enterprises to avoid trademark issues.

    So they've been able to continue in their priviliaged position paying Nagios Enterprises SFA for theses years, until finally some mid-level bureaucrat decided that the money they were getting ($0) from nagios-plugins.org community group doesn't outweigh the brand-risk that they pose, and they brought the website back inhouse.

    Wow, I would never have seen that coming!!

    Sounds to me like Nagios Enterprises is readying its self for sale.

    This is the open source business model. Cisco have been at it for years. Get used to it.

  10. Re: Copyright violation. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pray they do not alter it further...

  11. Re:Copyright violation. by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You seem to be completely overlooking the issue of copyright. Re-appropriating the domain was apparently within Nagios' rights, but copying the contents of the web site was not. Trademark rights are not virally transmissible to copyright.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  12. Somone had to plug icinga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Someone had to plug the better open source monitor. Icinga (https://www.icinga.org/) is either a fork from nagios 2 or a rebuilt but either way has config file level compatibility with your nagios configs. A way saner architecture for writing add-ons and a better web ui.

    1. Re:Somone had to plug icinga by michael.friedrich · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually Icinga was forked off Nagios 3.2.1 and some patches ahead. Meanwhile we've ported plenty of Nagios patches, but also sent them Icinga patches. At some point, they've removed the Icinga copyright on those patches, and banned me from their bug tracker. But since people had been asking quite often, which patches and features are exclusive to Icinga, I had compiled a periodically updated table with all details exposed. https://www.icinga.org/2011/11/03/icinga-vs-nagios-a-developers-comparison/ And while we're still working on the 1.x branch, we're preparing Icinga 2 and Icinga Web 2 for their first final releases, overcoming long lasting problems (such as an integrated cluster stack, or recurring downtimes).

  13. Re:Copyright violation. by mysidia · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, and that would hold weight if you weren't using their trademark all over your site.

    I think you don't get it... the Nagios Plugins project pre-dated Nagios. The Nagios Plugins Project was renamed from The NetSaint plugins project due to trademark issues. Nagios was an acronym for "Nagios Aint gonna insist on Sainthood"
    The open source project was using the name before Nagios Enterprises was founded, and these development teams, therefore have prior use of the name Nagios.

    They were apparently tricked into handing over control of the domain to the guy who founded Nagios enterprises later.

  14. Re:Alternatives... by michael.friedrich · · Score: 5, Informative

    The funny thing is, that Nagios Enterprises didn't write Nagios 4.0 - that work was done by Andreas Ericsson who works for op5. So instead, you should call "Nagios 4 Core" "op5 Core" if you're looking for the who-did-write-it. The sad thing is, that Nagios Enterprises kicked out Andreas Ericsson out of the Nagios core development after recognizing that people actually knew that Andreas was the only core developer at that time - working for a competitor. Andreas forked Nagios 4 into Naemon abandoning the dictatorship by Nagios Enterprises. You may find their website interesting but there more interesting read is located here in terms of the Nagios Plugins project: https://www.monitoring-plugins.org/archive/devel/2014-January/009432.html If you're interested in more details, the announcement happened on last years OSMC http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgbbyyNIiHc So other than the clusterfuck by Nagios Enterprises in regards of lying to the community again, they've lost their last core developer and there are fellow forks around the corner filling the gap. If you're questioning yourself - I am the lead core dev of Icinga, but what's written here is my sole personal opinion.

  15. From the bugzilla thread by rk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "nagios-plugins is not a fork, but a rebase with new team members. monitoring-plugins is indeed a fork, as their new name suggests."

    That is rich.