Slashdot Mirror


Regulations Could Delay or Prevent Space Tourism

schwit1 writes "This report explains how Virgin Galactic space tourists could be grounded by federal regulations. From the article: 'Virgin Galactic submitted an application to the FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation in late August 2013, says Attenborough. The office, which goes by the acronym AST, has six months to review the application, meaning an approval may come as early as February. Industry experts, however, say that may be an overly optimistic projection. "An application will inevitably be approved, but it definitely remains uncertain exactly when it will happen," says Dirk Gibson, an associate professor of communication at the University of New Mexico and author of multiple books on space tourism. "This is extremely dangerous and unchartered territory. It's space travel. AST has to be very prudent," he says. "They don't want to endanger the space-farers or the public, and they can't let the industry get started and then have a Titanic-like scenario that puts an end to it all in the eyes of the public.""

11 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. Titanic by Spaham · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, like the Titanic stopped boat traveling, right ?

    1. Re:Titanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hindenburg would have been a better example.

  2. Re:Certainly the government can make sure it's saf by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They can't even get their own name right.

    "FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation [...] which goes by the acronym AST"

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  3. Bullet meet foot by horm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds like a good way to drive privatized space travel to another country.

  4. So, launch from off shore by bobjr94 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just like cruise ships are registered all over the world, typically in countries with fewer regulations, whats to stop these space tourism companies from doing the same thing. If you can pay $100,000 or whatever for a quick trip into space, kicking in another $700 for airfare shouldn't be a deal breaker.

  5. Re:That's stupid by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Hey guys! I just went to Paris! I stayed in the plane the whole time and flew over it and came back!

    People take balloon and helicopter rides, cruises, etc, just to sight-see. There are routine 747 flights over Antarctica which never land there, sight-seeing only through little airliner windows.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  6. Re:extremely dangerous and unchartered territory by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They live in the nanny state where it's the job of the government to make sure you don't miss a step and get a boo-boo.

  7. The Largest Gallery by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An empty deadly vacuum is not that much of a destination, you know?

    It is when it's a gallery that holds one singularly fine blue object on full display.

    Plus, weightlessness.

    Frankly I don't agree with anything you are saying.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  8. Space is dangerous by physicsphairy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please raise your hand if you are planning on using a large controlled explosion to propel yourself into the oxygenless, -270 Celsius medium of space, return by crashing back down hundreds of miles, and your plan to do so is rooted in the belief that this is all fantastically safe and unlikely to result in your death.

    I think the government space program has had an overall fatality rate of something not quite 10%. It's reasonable considering just what they've been doing, but even if commercial space flight is 10 X more safe than the program NASA developed, that's still going to be some guaranteed casualties for any widely implemented program. It's certainly nothing you would tolerate coming from an air liner. Anyone going up is going to have to be acknowledging the not-utterly-unlikely possibility of their death

    That said, some oversight isn't bad -- as long it's reasonable and not based on the stupid and unquantifiable "We have the prevent the next Titanic" metric -- but what the government should *really* be offering is direct assistance. The program is still small enough that it's entirely reasonable to help out all the viable startups, and nothing is going to promote success and safety so much as direct cooperation with experienced persons at NASA.

  9. Re:That's stupid by Bartles · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "jaded rich white people"? Do you think non-white people might be interested in traveling into space? Are only rich white people jaded? Can a brown person be rich and jaded? Or just jaded?

  10. Re:Certainly the government can make sure it's saf by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the day people stop clapping their hands just because the spacecraft takes off without blowing up on the launchpad.

    People clap because its fucking awesome.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."