Slashdot Mirror


Mars Rover Opportunity Finds Life-Friendly Niche

astroengine writes "Gale Crater, the region being explored by NASA's Curiosity rover, isn't the only place on Mars where ancient microbes may have thrived. New evidence from NASA's senior robotic Mars scout, Opportunity, shows life-friendly water once mixed with telltale, clay-bearing rocks that now lie on the broken rim of Endeavour Crater, an ancient 14-mile wide basin on the other side of the planet from Gale. 'If I were to go Mars early in time and wanted to do a well, I'd do it there,' planetary scientist Ray Arvidson, with Washington University in St. Louis, told Discovery News. 'It's like drinking water. This would have been a niche for whatever life at the time existed.'"

15 of 55 comments (clear)

  1. So, when are we going to send tunnel-bots? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

    We get it already -- there was water there, and apparently there still is water under the surface. If Mars One actually goes through, I hope they take lots of shovels, and do lots of digging.

    1. Re:So, when are we going to send tunnel-bots? by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny thing is though, the total surface area of Mars is only a little over 3 times the land area of Asia.

      Mars is quite small, so excavating at maybe under 40 sites on the entire planet should be statistically a good search.

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    2. Re:So, when are we going to send tunnel-bots? by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right. the LAND area of Mars and Earth are close.

      Land area of Earth 148 million km.
      Surface area of Mars 144.8 million km

      So our sample to date is pretty miserable.
      However, our samples to date agree with out space based observations. Both on earth and on mars. We don't have to turn over every rock.

      We need rovers that can get to some more risky locations. http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap03...

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:So, when are we going to send tunnel-bots? by dargaud · · Score: 2

      We need rovers that can get to some more risky locations

      Indeed. Why don't they land a rover at the bottom of the very deepest canyon ? Higher air pressure, more humidity... They should start mass producing those rovers. Making 10 of them is probably hardly more expensive than just making one anyway.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  2. I know it's irrational by geekoid · · Score: 2

    But I feel ripped off the Mars doesn't have surface water now.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I know it's irrational by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

      If its any consolation, there has been evidence suggesting that mud presently exists on Mars.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  3. Re:Disappointed by Jhon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We must have the humility to understand the limits of our intellect"

    Um... no. We must have the blind ambition to push beyond some perceived limits of our intellect. Humility for our achievements -- but aggressive in our progress. I for one would like to see my great^x grand children living on another rock circling another fireball one day.

  4. Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here is idea for studying the subsurface that is affordable enough that we could actually live long enough to see it; we know the position (orbit, velocity, etc) of Mars with great precision. Why not build a cheap, simple impactor and send it to Mars. Aim it a few hundred meters away from a rover and blow a crater in the surface, recording the impact for spectral analysis and throwing debris around the crater for close inspection. A carefully guided projectile should have a CEP of only tens of meters; risk to a rover would be negligible.

    So simple you can take the engineering for granted and so fast we could have it done in only slightly more time than the flight.

    1. Re:Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "cheap and simple" and "Mars" do not occur together

      Mars mission costs are mostly sunk into the lander/package (i.e. rover.) Launchers aren't that expensive. The idea offered here is just a small inertial warhead with a simple guidance package. No tethers, retro-rockets, balloons, lander telemetry, solar collectors, autonomous navigation, etc., etc. All that complexity and cost is gone.

      The cost would be low and the mission profile simple; blow out a crater near a rover.

      current CEP for Mars landers is measured in kilometers

      We have reconnaissance orbiters around Mars now. The CEP could be reduced several orders of magnitude by using the orbiters for precise guidance.

      Part of the reason for high CEP with lander missions is the deceleration profile. This is not a lander. It's a high velocity projectile following a ballistic trajectory all the way to impact.

  5. Impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You used an awful lot of words to say not very much.

    Understanding the limits of our intellect is exactly the reason for pushing our boundaries to explore. Intellect can be extended and the only way to do so is through exercise. The alternative you (seem) to be proposing is the equivalent of sitting around picking at one's belly fluff in the hope of divine inspiration. In case it's not immediately obvious: that isn't what got us where we are today.

  6. Re:Not a bad run, so far.. by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Insightful
    We're looking at real time pictures from fscking Mars!

    Each time a fail of any magnitude occurs, it is incessantly toasted by ambitiously administering the brogans to the deceased equine.

    Yet two rovers designed to last 90 days on another freaking planet operate 24x and 40x+ design specifications without overtaking the Bieber arrest in internet interest.

    We need a new PR guy.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  7. Re:Not a bad run, so far.. by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, we simply need to strap Bieber to the next mars rover. This would solve 2 problems.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  8. Re:Not a bad run, so far.. by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wish my mod points hadn't expired.

    I don't think it is so much bad PR from JPL - they do pretty well with their limited PR budget, but more that these explorations rapidly exhaust the short attention spans of most of the public. Sojourner landed in 1997, Spirit & Opportunity in 2004 (with Opportunity still operational today) and Curiosity in 2012. Kids have grown up for over 10 years with pictures from rovers on Mars. There are teenagers and young adults today who can't remember a time when we didn't have a rover on Mars. It's old news.

    And the missions themselves - launch day (big fiery fast moving things!) is pretty cool, but then you have a long, quiet coast phase. Then maybe you have a complicated and dramatic re-entry / touchdown that gets attention up (Pathfinder, the MER rovers, and the Curiosity skycrane ftw). But after that, it's a long slow roll across something that looks like the Arizona desert. The science is immensely interesting, but there isn't much gee whiz factor for the average person. And some of those average people are the ones that decide what gets aired on the news, so if they don't care to see it, few others will.

    I actually don't think that many people give a damn about Bieber's shenanigans, but somebody in the media thinks that is the noise that will attract the eyeballs to their ads.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  9. 14-mile wide? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    14-mile wide basin on the other side of the plane

    Sorry but Martians used the metric system.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  10. The Phoenix probe found ice just under soil by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Phoneix landed in late Martian summer when it was too warm for ice to exist at the surface. But its shovel just cleared off a couple centimeters of soil and hit ice. That ice promptly evaporated too.

    Phoenix died during the winter when it was thought probably at least a meter of snow-ice accumulated on top of it and crushed it. Or its batteries were drained beyond recovery during the winter.