Slashdot Mirror


Sony Selling Off VAIO Computer Business

Kensai7 writes "Confirming reports from earlier in the week, Sony has announced plans to sell off its VAIO computer division to a Japanese investment fund. Japan Industrial Partners (JIP) will take control of the operation for an undisclosed fee, and Sony will 'cease planning, design and development of PC products.' For a variety of reasons 'including the drastic changes in the global PC industry,' Sony says 'the optimal solution is to concentrate its mobile product lineup on smartphones and tablets and to transfer its PC business to a new company.'" I have some nostalgia for the tiny old VAIO laptops; I wish more companies incorporated the swiveling camera that they came with.

44 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. Sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i am on my 3rd sony vaio product - have been using them for the past decade pretty much. OMG. Sony's vaio design team is awesome!!! Very sad news.

    1. Re:Sad news by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mod -1 ontopic.

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
    2. Re:Sad news by Scutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because only a tiny percentage of PC users want to use (or have even heard of) Linux. Like it or not, we are in the minority.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:Sad news by MMC+Monster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oddly enough, not one story on slashdot in the last couple days about Beta. So, of course, we discuss it in every other story on the site.

      I tried it again today and if you think the article and comments sections are horrible, you should see the user profile section.

      We cannot see how many replies a comment we had written has received. I find this an important tool to answer questions I have (just look at some of my previous comments) about the topic at hand.

      Why couldn't they have just adjusted the style sheet a bit and let everything else stay the same? If they wanted to open up another site, they could have just done that and left /. alone. The domain name can't be *that* lucrative for them.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    4. Re:Sad news by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      And the primary reason for that is that the manufacturers are not promoting machines running it, and are sometimes even prevented from doing so by agreements with MS.

      Very few people actually want to use windows either, most use whatever is available and don't actually care what it is. A lot of people actually hate windows, and only tolerate it because they are unaware or afraid of any alternatives.

      Most of the arguments against linux are entirely bogus and have been proven untrue. With appropriate marketing from hardware manufacturers and a half decent distro (ie not the crap unsupportable distros netbooks often had), linux would sell just fine. At the very least a dual boot system could be offered, with appropriate marketing about the benefits of using it.

      As for the arguments often levelled against linux:

      Lack of drivers - this only matters for post-purchase install, if your supplying linux with the hardware then you're going to be supplying linux compatible hardware.
      Difficult to install - as above, if its supplied with hardware it will already be installed. plus linux is actually easier to install than windows these days anyway.
      Can't buy boxed software - as if people do this anyway, linux distros use a repository system, and apple/google have proven that users actually like this approach.
      Unfamiliar software - most people pretty much only browse the web, you have firefox and chrome on linux and you don't hear people complaining that safari on ipad is unfamiliar.
      Lack of games - true, although its improving with steam etc, and relatively few people play many games (hence the popularity of integrated gfx which arent up to the job of playing games), a lot play online flash games which work on linux,

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:Sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Score: 5, Absurd)

      They just can't get beyond this "it must be DOS compatible" mental block on tends to associate with PCs.

      Fortunately, Windows 95 should resolve that pesky reliance on DOS and free us from the tyranny of the command line. Then, X Windows FTW! Jeesh, KDE is just as good. And Gnome uses callbacks! VISAFB all the way!

      I'm placing my bets on SCO OpenServer. HP-UX is obsolete. Netcraft confirms it.

    6. Re:Sad news by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You think it's absurd but I actually remember when the Microsoft hegemony started. It wasn't with Windows 95. It was long before.

      People like to pretend that something other than the biggest turd available won the market. It hurts their brains to contemplate it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:Sad news by maynard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of the arguments against linux are entirely bogus and have been proven untrue.

      Here is the problem with Linux. And *BSD as well.

      It doesn't run the commercial software I need to successfully fulfill my objectives.

      We can point our fingers at Adobe, Microsoft, and other commercial players who limit access of their apps to expand their own markets at the expense of Linux. But the model that open source would engender network effects and overtake commercial players who would shoot their own feet by refusing to develop on the platform...well, that turned out to be false.

      The open source community beat commercial players on a limited playing field in server space. And then the commercial players changed the game. Ironically, Linux has become even more irrelevant as a populist movement because of its backend success.

      The Linux desktop lost for valid reasons. It's been out there long enough to catch hold and it hasn't. It's long past time to look inward on that front. It's popular failure is entirely self-inflicted.

    8. Re:Sad news by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Informative

      You live in a funny world -

      In MY world, sucks to be me I suppose, I have to use PROGRAMS. That are only written for Windows (maybe OS X, but few Enterprise programs are in OS X). Those PROGRAMS won't run on Linux or WINE (or Windows 7 but that's another issue).

      In MY world, we have to attach to a network with fairly strict controls. Yes, a Linux network could do that, but since Linux won't run the PROGRAMS, it's hardly worth the effort.

      PROGRAMS, PROGRAMS, PROGRAMS. Yes, the various distros have wonderful repositories for free software. Some of it excellent. A lot of it crap.

      Your narrow world is just one reason why Linux won't displace Windows. Linux has, and will continue to make inroads into computing at a number of levels, the desktop does not appear to be one of them.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Sad news by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So you're saying it's about developers? Developers, developers, developers?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    10. Re:Sad news by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      I thought it was about meatballs. bork bork bork!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    11. Re:Sad news by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, yes. If, for example, Adobe wrote Creative Suite to run on Linux, a lot of folks who use those programs would consider moving off of OS X, especially given Apple's reluctance to come up with mid priced tower hardware instead of high tech ashtrays.

      Autodesk does run on Linux but here you're talking high five and into the six figures - effectively not 'desktop'. And there is some other very, very pricey Linux enterprise software, but in this scenario, the workstations are really just chump change.

      If MS ported the Office Suite to Linux, well, hell would probably freeze over, Stahlman would expire in a bought of apoplectic fury and quite a few places who don't rely on Windows based Line of Business software would switch, but I don't think that's happening any time soon.

      So yes, Developers, Developers, Developers. Ballmer was right about that.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:Sad news by tooslickvan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No one wants to use Linux or Windows. Have you tried to use an operating system? All you can do is copy files and set the time. It's fun the first few times, but it becomes boring really fast. No, people do not want to use an operating system; they want send email, browser the web, check stock quotes, send goofy pictures to their friends. That's what they want.

  2. Re:So who is left by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    HP/Compaq have merged

    Current affairs are not your strong point that was nearly a decade ago!

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  3. Why sell? Why not burn and collect insurance? by erroneus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I do not agree with some of the comments here. I have found Sony laptops and desktops to be wanting in so many ways not the least of which is the repairability. It amazes me they could actually put that many screws into such tight spaces. The screws must double the weight of their machines or more. And the durability of their machines? Ridiculous. I can't say that I ever bought or used any of their "high end" machines, but the ones I have worked with had problems at all levels. And I hate the software. There's simply nothing I like about Sony computers. They need to disappear, not get passed on to the next unfortunate recipient.

  4. Help kill beta! by unitron · · Score: 5, Informative

    Join the Slashcott!

    February 10th - 17th

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    1. Re:Help kill beta! by MtHuurne · · Score: 2

      It all depends on the numbers. If there is 5% less traffic in that week, they'll ignore it. If there is 50% less traffic, they might take notice.

      Also, unlike most boycotts, this protest is not against an unpopular corporate policy, but against the product itself. The beta interface has such poor usability that I can't see myself using it, even if I wanted to.

  5. Fuck Beta by portraitofsanity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Slashdot Overlords, You can continue posting new stories, but we will just keep complaining about the beta. Can you meet us halfway and actually create a story for us to dump hatred into so that we can go back to commenting on articles we haven't read? This isn't going to go away, and you might have realized this is not the most patient and incapable group. In a week this whole community can be destroyed or moved...

  6. Congratulations Slashdot! Beta SUCKS by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My advice to the peons working on Slashdot: find another job. The veracity with which this "upgrade" is being pushed displays a stubborness that can only be attributed to MBAs with no idea of what Slashdot is about. The fact that the commenting system is such an afterthought in the Beta is as much evidence as I need that the people pushing this redesign never use this site.

    I know you don't get to decide whether or not the Beta moves forward or which design gets used, but believe this: You WILL be blamed when it fails. You work for a corporation now and the higher ups with undoubtedly throw you under the bus when they have to explain to their bosses or shareholders why the website redesign failed. This failure is going to be associated with you and your teammates and it will set back any hopes you have of being promoted within the company. Take the advice of me and my fellow Slashdotters: Get out now.

    --
    The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
  7. Re:So who is left by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    I think the industry has been its own undoing, as efficiency has increased, prices have dropped and its been harder and harder to make money even tho PCs still sell. If you cant move the volume you cant survive.

    We may end up with a single company making them here soon.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  8. On-topic comment by StripedCow · · Score: 2

    I was going to make an honest, on-topic comment.

    But... screw it.
    Fuck Beta!

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  9. Slashdot Beta: Day two by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was a fitful night. Not much rest. The way the tragic events unfolded yesterday had left a type of brain trauma I've not quite experienced before. Whitespace.... gobs and gobs of it.. summaries taking up the entirety of my browser window..... the damn thing was relentless and sneaky; Sometimes redirecting to a familiar and sane UI, yet other times..... DEAR GOD MAKE IT STOP!!!!!...... *gaaack*... *AAaccck* *synack*... *thump*.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  10. Re:Fuck Beta by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Indeed, a company that neglects the views of a site's user community is truly clueless. Slashdot has its own traditions, and Slashdotters like the fact that it has an older and faster design that allows more content on the page. That's part of what makes this site special. If Dice doesn't understand some of these very basic matters, then I don't trust them with the future of Slashdot.

    The new design is really ugly Web 3.0 crap, by the way. Just a bunch of huge pictures, excessive whitespace, and fade effects -- treating a technical website like a picture book for Joe Sixpack! Part of the greatness of Slashdot was always its special moderation system, also, which controlled discussions in a positive way (not just +1 or -1 for dumb-dumbs). Talk about not understanding your demographic...

    --
    Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  11. It's confirmed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is now official. Netcraft has confirmed: Slashdot is dying.

            One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Slashdot community when IDC confirmed that Slashdot page views has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all websites. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Slashdot has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Slashdot is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by the stupid fucking beta website and the wholesale discard of user feedback.

            You don't need to be the Amazing Kreskin to predict Slashdot's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Slashdot faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Slashdot because Slashdot is dying. Things are looking very bad for Slashdot. As many of us are already aware, Slashdot continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

            Slashdot Beta is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core users. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time Slashdot users Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: Slashdot is dying.

            All major surveys show that Slashdot has steadily declined in market share. Slashdot is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Slashdot is to survive at all it will be among S&M enthusiasts. Slashdot continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Slashdot is dead.

    That crippling bombshell sent Slashdot fans into a tailspin of mourning and denial. However, bad news poured in like a river of water.

  12. Re:So who is left by maynard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps we are indeed witnessing the downfall of the PC era.

    Is that good or bad?

    For open platforms manufactured by large companies, it's bad. We can still buy barebones PCs and cheap laptops, but there's an obvious transition away toward locked down systems like tablets and consumer products.

    OTOH: the old PC was a successor to prior hobby platforms that were fully open. The old ALTAIR / IMSAI, Heathkit, SWTPC, Apple II, etc world of 8 bit before it went corporate. If IBM had had its way, what we're seeing today would have happened much sooner. Ironically, we can thank Microsoft for stalling that outcome for decades. It had already happened twice with mainframe and minicomputer players decades before, as they swiped ideas and technology developed in university labs for commercialization and then locked them down.

    So maybe this shift will engender a resurgence of very slow systems designed for hobbyists to built from scratch. A bifurcation of commercial products for the general public and a hobby community that might lead to hands on hardware / software development of entirely new platforms. A real resurgence of competition without commercial pressure because it's being done just for fun.

    Such systems wouldn't fulfill the expectations of consumers. Nor should they. But they might be cool to tinker with. And that could have second order effects down the road that could impact future markets in unexpected ways. Or not. And who cares?

    A hobbyist / commercial hardware split might be for the best.

    Or, maybe I'm talking nonsense. I often do.

  13. What is the big deal with VAIO? by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    I never understood the appeal of the Sony laptops. It seemed like they were trying to hit the Apple price point but with reliability that made the Apple laptops look like the greatest feat of engineering since the wheel. Add to that all the bloatware that Sony installed as standard and I really can't find an advantage.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  14. One-way street to BETA by davecb · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can't get out of beta if you try it, as they removed the link that returns you to classic. Fortunately, you can delete all the beta cookies and return to normal...

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  15. Good riddance. Worst computers EVER to work on. by nctritech · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As someone who has had to rip open and repair Sony VAIO desktops and laptops for a long time, I can say with authority that they're the WORST computer brand EVER when it comes to the repair business. Every computer has two different model numbers, there are a seemingly infinite number of minor incompatible variants, finding used parts is a ridiculous endeavor (because everything has to have multiple model and part numbers and almost no part seems to be drop-in compatible) and I don't care if I never see another one on my workbench ever again.

    Any full-sized laptop that requires you to remove the keyboard, all the top plastics, and heaps of fragile FPC cables just to get to the hard drive and memory is automatically ultra-shitty shit and the engineers responsible should be bear dick punched. Maybe the new owners will fix some of this mess. /rant

    1. Re:Good riddance. Worst computers EVER to work on. by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

      I've worked on my Sony TRxA series subnotebooks and I agree that they're rather frustrating. But they don't compare at all to the time I had to disassemble a 12" Powerbook G4 to replace the harddrive. I wish all laptops were as easy to work on as my Thinkpads, but we can't have everything in life.. :(

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    2. Re:Good riddance. Worst computers EVER to work on. by Anti-Social+Network · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the tiny, thin screws that had a tendency to break off at the head and/or strip if you so much as look at them wrong- and which, of course, required a (smaller) different screwdriver head to take out, assuming you were successful. And the special ACPI devices which are unintuitive to get drivers for when you've got to do a reload. Whoever designed those all-in-ones with no access to the internals needs a severe talking too.

      --
      Goddammit just when I get my first +5 the Beta rolls out and kills everything
  16. Re:Nostalgia? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So far I've seen Beta only once - the /. page showed up all messed up, and asked me if I wanted to try it out, to which I quickly said no - and since then I haven't been bothered.

    But I must say, if Beta truly is as atrocious as I've once seen it, I won't be visiting this here site much in the future.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  17. Betamax by dysmal · · Score: 2

    I sincerely hope that BETA dies a quicker and more painful death than Sony's BETAMAX.

  18. I imagine the Slashdot beta by gallondr00nk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks absolutely dreadful on a Sony Vaio.

  19. A Message from the Beta's Target Audience by hendrips · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dear Slashdot,

    I'm fairly sure that I know what you're trying to do with Beta crap. You're trying to lure in a younger, more hip readership that's less technical but brings in more revenue. In other words, this "Web 2.0" redesign is trying to attract people exactly like me. I'm young, male, middle-class, and (possibly) looking for a new job, which I suspect is exactly the demographic you're aiming the Beta at. I'm also less technically inclined - I'm an actuary, not a programmer or an IT guy. As you can see from my posting history, I've only been here a short time, although I read and posted anonymously for a while at first.

    But I hate Slashdot Beta every bit as much as the old fogies who are complaining above me. I don't come to Slashdot for flamebait articles or glitzy graphics, I come here because I want to learn about and discuss technical topics that I don't encounter in my day-to-day work. I read the discussions here so that I can understand the technical stuff that my office's IT lady tells me, and so that I can better understand the technology that I interact with. I comment in discussions here because I want to avoid the teenage, brain dead, narcissistic, color vomiting "new new internet" bullshit twittering that's infecting discourse on the rest of the internet.

    I've just started participating in the Slashdot community. I'm pretty sure that I'm the exact demographic you want to attract. You had such a good opportunity to reel me in permanently. Yet you've utterly failed with Slashdot Beta. I've already abandoned a fair number of web communities after they gutted their discussion system or went too far with the Web 2.0 nonsense. Likewise, I'll regretfully, but quickly, abandon Slashdot if I'm forced into this Beta bullshit against my will and against the obvious will of the community here.

    Sincerely,
    hendrips, a representative member of your target audience
       

  20. This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    beta.slashdot is so bad that Sony had to sell its computer business.

  21. I salute you by OrugTor · · Score: 2

    My Vaio is 10+ years old and never a problem. Granted, it's an outlier especially wrt the hard drive but still...

  22. Re:Fuck Beta by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Indeed, a company that neglects the views of a site's user community is truly clueless.

    Not only clueless, but it's sheer stupidity. They release a turd site and ask feedback to improve it. Then they take none of that feedback into consideration and begin rolling that same site into live. A site which no one likes. Then no one comes here anymore. What else is this than pure stupidity?

    All right. I will calmly watch this show to the end and see what the final result is. But if it resembles anything like what they are cooking now, I am left with no other options than to leave this website.

  23. Re:Fuck Beta by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    1. Metro
    2. Unity
    3...Apple Maps
    4...
    5 SLASHDOT BETA!

    6. Oracle
    7. Lotus Notes
    8. Healthcare.gov
    9. PS/2
    10. WIndows ME
    11. Microsoft Bob
    12. Clippy
    13. Clippy
    14. Clippy
    15. Lotus Notes

    "May no new thing arise" - Spanish prayer

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  24. Re:Fuck Beta by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    Can you meet us halfway and actually create a story for us to dump hatred into so that we can go back to commenting on articles we haven't read?

    Actually there is a story. The problem is that it's hidden in the Slashdot Blog which most of us do not even know to exist.

    Posted 3 days ago: Update on the March of Progress: How Slashdot's New Look Is Shaping Up.

  25. At Sony headquarters by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    When they saw the new Slashdot Beta site at Sony engineering, they concluded that it's not worth to make computers anymore.

  26. It's all because of Beta. by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

    That would not have happened had those Dice assholes not try to push Beta on everyone.

    Fuck Beta. It killed vaio.
    Also, those dolphins washing up dead on the beaches? Beta killed them too.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  27. And this is the beginning of the end... by vikingpower · · Score: 2

    ...of another great line of hardware ( albeit expensive ). What a shame.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  28. They weren't computers by atari2600a · · Score: 2

    They were EXPENSIVE. The customer base they were targeting is the one that's walking right past the Sony store in the mall & right into the Apple store. They never even looked right either. Always long in one dimension, usually width. Fujitsu had the better line of pocket-sized laptops hands-down, & I'm pretty sure I've never serviced nor maintained VAIO back to life.

  29. Yay! Fewer crappy computers! by Chas · · Score: 2

    Less crap computers to deal with.

    Sure, the things always looked sexy.
    But they'd break if you looked at them funny.
    That and all the attempts to inject stupid, Sony-proprietary connectors on everything...

    I won't miss VAIO at all.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!