Slashdot Mirror


Spectacular New Martian Impact Crater Spotted From Orbit

New submitter kc123 writes: "The team that runs the HiRISE camera on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has released a photo showning a new impact crater on Mars, formed sometime early this decade. The crater at the center is about 30 meters in diameter, and the material ejected during its formation extends out as far as 15 kilometers. The impact was originally spotted by the MRO's Context Camera, a wide-field imaging system that provides the context—an image of the surrounding terrain—for the high-resolution images taken by HiRISE. The time window on the impact, between July 2010 and May 2012, simply represents the time between two different Context Camera photos of the same location. Once the crater was spotted, it took until November of 2013 for another pass of the region, at which point HiRISE was able to image it." Reader astroengine adds some more Mars news: "On Thursday at 3:41 p.m. EST (20:41 UTC), Mars rover Curiosity beamed back a photo from its rear hazard avoidance camera (Hazcam). In the shot we see wheel tracks in the downward slope of the dune bridging "Dingo Gap" with the peak of Curiosity's eventual goal, Mount Sharp, on the horizon. This can mean only one thing; the one-ton robot has successfully conquered its first Mars dune! Curiosity has also taken a picture of Earth."

20 of 99 comments (clear)

  1. Speaking of impact craters - anyone seen Beta? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slashdot Beta craters faster and makes a bigger mess than even the one on Mars does.

    Kill the Beta with FIRE!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Speaking of impact craters - anyone seen Beta? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      It occurs to me that if they didn't let people moderate except from beta, they could effectively stifle opposition.

  2. Whoops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wrong link!

    1. Re:Whoops! by glavenoid · · Score: 2

      This is probably the one time in the history of slashdot I can see why the editor got the link wrong:

      1. The submitter failed to include a link in the original submission.
      4. And everything on slashdot seems to be out of order lately.
      2. The editors are probably, uhh, preoccupied.
      3. Soulskill probably still had the wrong link in the copy+paste buffer and didn't bother to check before posting.

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    2. Re:Whoops! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Soulskill is lucky the wrong link was so benign.

  3. The pitchfork or the codefork by emmagsachs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mr. Moderator, brothers and sisters, friends and enemies: I just can’t believe everyone in here is a friend, and I don’t want to leave anybody out. The question tonight, as I understand it, is “The Slashdot Revolt, and Where Do We Go From Here?” or "What Next?” In my little humble way of understanding it, it points toward either the pitchfork or the codefork.

    Although I’m still a Slashdotter, I’m not here tonight to improve my karma. I’m not here to try and change your karma. I’m not here to argue or discuss anything that we differ about, because it’s time for us to submerge our differences and realize that it is best for us to first see that we have the same problem, a common problem, a problem that will make you catch hell whether you’re a Troll, or a Shill, or a First Time Submitter or a Karma Whore. Whether you’re educated or illiterate, whether you live on the boulevard or in the alley, you’re going to catch hell just like I am. We’re all in the same boat and we all are going to catch the same hell from the same man. He just happens to be a work at Dice.

    Now in speaking like this, it doesn’t mean that we’re anti-Dice, but it does mean we’re anti-Beta, we’re anti-SlashBI, we’re anti-Slashcloud. And if Dice doesn’t want us to be anti-it, let it stop forcing Beta on us. Whether we are Trolls or Shills or Karma Whores, we must first learn to forget our differences. If we have differences, let us differ in the closet; when we come out in front, let us not have anything to argue about until we get finished arguing with Dice. If the late President Kennedy could get together with Portman and exchange some grits, we certainly have more in common with each other than Kennedy and Portman had with each other.

    If we don’t do something real soon, I think you’ll have to agree that we’re going to be forced either to use the pitchfork or the codefork. It’s one or the other in 2014. It isn’t that time is running out — time has run out!

    (And a thank you to arth1)

    1. Re:The pitchfork or the codefork by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      I vote for pitchforks and guillotines.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:The pitchfork or the codefork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't care about beta anymore. Deleting posts and modding down stuff that they don't care is MUCH WORSE - THAT'S whats really killing slashdot.
      So farewell. See ya at reddit.

    3. Re:The pitchfork or the codefork by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      Not that you're going to be here to read this, but don't you think that the downmodders may just be normal people who are tired of reading this shit? I know I am. And I have mod points.

      Yesterday, entire threads were getting hit with "offtopic" mods at exactly the same time. It was obviously the work of the "editors." Normal moderators don't work in concert like that.

      The post that timothy made, though, has at least made me decide to stop trashing the comment threads for the time being. I figure that they can have a little time to get their act together and determine that the classic slashdot interface won't be going away. Might as well give them until after the boycott from 10-17 Feb. But after that -- if they're still hell-bent on screwing up the site, might as well assist in helping Slashdot completely implode.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  4. new Impact crater in Beta by illestov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet. (Copy-paste the html from here so links don't get mangled!)

    On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design. Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

    If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

    We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
    We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott

    Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
    Commentors - only discuss Beta
    http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

    Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

    -----=====##### LINKS #####=====-----

    Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=56395415
    Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=3321441
    Alternative Slashdot: http://altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

  5. Working link by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative
  6. Link is wrong. Beta sucks too. by tim_dion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Link is wrong. Beta sucks too.

  7. A fixed link to the photo by DroneWhatever · · Score: 2

    A link that shows the photo! Imagine that, 2 seconds to proof click an article.

  8. Wrong again by dale.furno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Will beta correct the wrong link in the article? Didn't think so

    fucking beta

  9. Re:Obliterate the Beta by Arker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Beta is so pretty, I love how they use these wierd little boxes with cryptic codes inside instead of graphics, and manage to fit 20% of the information on the page while still wasting the entire right third of the screen on empty space. And refusing to load any comments sure is a time saver! With nothing but the usually erroneous (and only semi-intelligible) blurb to see, and no ability to reply, the hour or two a week I currently waste on slashdot will certainly be spent doing more productive things in the future.

    Thanks Dice!

    /sarcasm

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  10. Re:ATTN: Screwed Up by pmontra · · Score: 2

    In other news: Hypersonic Missile Digs Spectacular Martial Impact Crater. Sorry I can't post a link to that, it's Top Secret!

  11. Can you please post a link to Space.com? by jafac · · Score: 2

    I need a 320x200, heavily compressed jpeg, with a space.com logo watermark across the bottom 1/3.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  12. The real link from HIRISE by aepervius · · Score: 2

    https://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu... trully spectaculare.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  13. Re:Only in Government does "last decade" = "new" by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Early this decade" is not the same as "last decade". The impact happened between 2010 and 2012. That could make it less than 2 years old. On a geologic scale, that is most definitely "new". It's certainly not "old".

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  14. Re:Obliterate the Beta by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 2
    Let it go...
    I fully commiserate with you, but it's over. Read the excerpt below from the Dice 2013 full year financial report.

    Slashdot Media was acquired to provide content and services that are important to technology professionals in their everyday work lives and to leverage that reach into the global technology community benefiting user engagement on the Dice.com site. The expected benefits have started to be realized at Dice.com. However, advertising revenue has declined over the past year and there is no improvement expected in the future financial performance of Slashdot Media's underlying advertising business. Therefore, $7.2 million of intangible assets and $6.3 million of goodwill related to Slashdot Media were reduced to zero.

    Zero!!

    They've basically written off slashdot as worthless and are now in desperation mode trying to minimize their losses, and if that means turning slashdot into a Justin Beiber Fan page on Facebook then that is what they will do. The original slashdot "audience" is worthless to them and they don't give a damn if we are unhappy and threaten to go elsewhere.

    The slashdot that we used to know and love is gone, and the only thing left for us is to direct our energies towards either the altslashdot initiative or respectfully ask Mr. Perens to re-ressurect technocrat.net.