Why the Internet of Things Is More 1876 Than 1995
An anonymous reader writes "Some folks would like you to think that 1995 was the year everybody was brought online and that, starting this year, we'll bring everything else along for the ride. If that seems far fetched to you, Glen Martin writes about how the Internet of Things has more in common with the age of steam than the digital revolution: 'Philadelphia's Centennial Exposition of 1876 was America's first World's Fair, and was ostensibly held to mark the nation's 100th birthday. But it heralded the future as much as it celebrated the past, showcasing the country's strongest suit: technology. ... While the Internet changed everything, says Stogdill, "its changes came in waves, with scientists and alpha geeks affected first, followed by the early adopters who clamored to try it. It wasn’t until the Internet was ubiquitous that every Kansas farm boy went online. That 1876 Kansas farm boy may not have foreseen every innovation the Industrial Revolution would bring, but he knew — whether he liked it or not — that his world was changing."'"
...when Goatse was real and scared everybody off my lawn. Now that was automation!
Table-ized A.I.
Can we stop using these ridiculous buzz words/phrases?
Internet of things? Really?
The one, single biggest weakness with the whole IoT-movement is the lack of any sorts of standards. Devices from one manufacturer use this protocol to talk to one another, the devices from another manufacturer use another protocol, neither of them can communicate with one another, and to top it off many devices even within a single manufacturer's own line of products don't know how to communicate amongst themselves. This means a huge, tangled mess of dozens of controlling applications and physical control-panels and whatnot, and it's all ripe with security-issues, too. With no standards or anything there's no logical way of controlling all of your IoT-devices in a unified way, let alone to control their security and updates.
On a similar note, there was recently talk on Ars Technica about this subject when the CEO of WIFI Alliance tried to make the case that all IoT-devices should simply use WIFI, but that would be folly. His primary argument was that even though WIFI uses more power than e.g. Bluetooth-LE it provides more bandwidth and that the amount of power WIFI uses is irrelevant. That argument obviously ignores the fact that if, on average, every household in the future had e.g. approximately 50 IoT-devices in their homes we would then see the power-drain on the electric-networks increase by 50 * 117M ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ) * WIFI-power-drain just within the United States alone -- a definitely non-neglibigle amount. Also, your fridge, coffee-maker and the likes have absolutely zero need for all the bandwidth WIFI would bring, so Bluetooth-LE or something similar would be the saner choice -- less power-usage, still more than enough bandwidth for the small amount of data being transferred. However, you'd again need some sort of a bridge for bringing the WIFI-devices and Bluetooth-LE-devices together, and again, you'd need sane standards in order to come up with such bridges.
I'm ranting a little, I haven't been sleeping too well and my thoughts are racing, but my point here is that even if the tech was there for the big push for IoT-devices we lack standardisation efforts, we lack the need for such devices, and I'm not sure the environmental costs would be worth the advantages either at this point in time.
Look, I don't know what you kids are using these days, but I still buy all my games on Steam just like they did in 1876.
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
It reminds me of a quote from Game of Thrones when young King Joffrey is put in his place - to paraphrase, a "real King" doesn't need to keep telling everyone "I am the King!"
I think slashcott turned into trolldot when everyone realised that they could not stay away for even a single day.
Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
The article is just blithering without much useful content. They couldn't even get the right illustration. The steam engine shown is just some random engine with Corliss valve gear. This is the engine that powered much of the 1876 exhibition. It was big, impressive, and inefficient, even for that exhibition.
The "Internet of Things" may be the Next Big Thing from the industry that brought you 3D TV.
When are they going to accept the fact that there is absolutely no need for 99.999% of the population to ever check the internet for the status of their dryer, their dishwasher, their fridge, their freezer, or their toaster oven and microwave.
It is the single most over-rated, over-sold, over-hyped, and absolutely useless concept ever brandished by the technocrati. The only ones who care about the concept at all are people who want to sell you stuff that is "internet aware."
I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
What everyone misses is the magic of Kansas City. Everything's up to date in Kansas City. They gone about as fer as they can go. They went an' built a skyscraper seven stories high. About as high as a buildin' orta grow.
Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
The Internet betrayed us all. The shiny object of our admiration is now a honeypot for our enslavement and a means to monetize the smallest of our private activities.
Let's destroy it, while there's still a chance.
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
My great-grandfather graduated from Milwaukee High School in 1878. He first attended a "normal school" with the intent of becoming a teacher, but found the opportunity to learn stenography and to operate a writing machine. The Scholes & Glidden machine had been developed in Milwaukee in 1874, and the manufacturers set up schools to teach students how to use them. These were very temperamental machines and were tricky to use. (At that time, you could not see the text that had been typed without lifting the platen). His first professional job was as a type-writer for the Winchester Repeating Arms Company in New Haven, Connecticut. Meanwhile, his long-time pen-pal in Chicago had learned how to use the machines at her father's office. They began exchanging letters in type-written form, which must have been considered, for that time, as high-tech as any Internet romance would have been in 1995. They were married in 1883. My great-grandfather and his brother-in-law went into business together, selling the machines across the Midwest.
Dont forget the bit about spying on us all. All we need is for our appliances to begin sending our information, for free, to its manufacturers to, in turn, use against us and sell to others for THEIR profit. Yes, fuck the internet of things. I dont want them to know what food I eat, how often I wash my clothes, how much coffee I drink and any other whimsical crap they think they can make of it.
I dont buy the part about service information, nobody gives a crap if it doesnt run, the consumer only buys more when it breaks, so I dont buy the crap theyre selling. It a fucking lie. Just like the government would tell. Just what a coy geek would believe too.
What a load of bunk, when they want my intimate information, its commerce, when I go dig up their information, its espionage, because its private business methods, concerns,intellectual property and I cant sell it to interested parties like they do. Well fuck that! The second I find one of my things spying on me, I will go to fun lengths to invade the company and the private lives of those who made it and do embarrasingly extrovert things with the resultant info.
Fuck the world , I WIN! I always win, I will always win and the world can like it or eat shit!
*Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!