The Problem With How We Think Of Surveillance

blastboy writes "Here's a great essay on Snowden, technology and the problem with how we think of surveillance. From the article: 'Why do we give them our data? For the same reason that prompted the protesters to pull out their phones amid a swirl of tear gas: digital channels are one of the easiest ways we have to talk to one another, and sometimes the only way. There are few things more powerful and rewarding than communicating with another person. It’s not a coincidence that the harshest legal punishment short of the death penalty in modern states is solitary confinement. Humans are social animals; social interaction is at our core. Yet the more we connect to each other online, the more our actions become visible to governments and corporations. It feels like a loss of independence. But as I stood in Gezi Park, I saw how digital communication had become a form of organization. I saw it enable dissent, discord, and protest.'"

Comments

Re:Huh?

[Anonymous Coward]

You are a statistical outlier. This is not about you. Sit back and learn about the majority of people, who are different from you.

The majority of people are idiots.

And you are an idiot too if you actually believe that I "should" care even slightly
about the fact that idiots do idiotic things, particularly when I have absolutely
no control nor even any influence over the behavior of those idiots.

By the way, fuck you and your sanctimonious bullshit, you holier-than-thou
prick.