Slashdot Mirror


A Year After Chelyabinsk, NASA Readying Asteroid Response Mission

An anonymous reader sends this NASA report: "One year ago, on Feb. 15, 2013, the world was witness to the dangers presented by near-Earth Objects (NEOs) when a relatively small asteroid entered Earth's atmosphere, exploding over Chelyabinsk, Russia, and releasing more energy than a large atomic bomb. ... NASA is now pursuing new partnerships and collaborations in an Asteroid Grand Challenge to accelerate NASA's existing planetary defense work, which will help find all asteroid threats to human population and know what to do about them. In parallel, NASA is developing an Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) — a first-ever mission to identify, capture and redirect an asteroid to a safe orbit of Earth's moon for future exploration by astronauts in the 2020s. ... NASA is assessing two concepts to robotically capture and redirect an asteroid mass into a stable orbit around the moon. In the first proposed concept, NASA would capture and redirect an entire very small asteroid. In the alternative concept, NASA would retrieve a large, boulder-like mass from a larger asteroid and return it to this same lunar orbit. In both cases, astronauts aboard an Orion spacecraft would then study the redirected asteroid mass in the vicinity of the moon and bring back samples."

12 of 64 comments (clear)

  1. The moon will have a moon by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That will be interesting for amateur astronomers as well. I know I would love to check that out

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  2. Finally, a mission for NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that almost everybody can agree deserves full funding

    1. Re:Finally, a mission for NASA by n1ywb · · Score: 3

      Not really. Couldn't robots do this at a fraction of the cost and risk?

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:Finally, a mission for NASA by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      the robots will do the capture and move it, not ppl. As to the rest of the mission, humans exploring it makes perfect sense once it is in lunar orbit. Both from the sense of costs as well as capabilities.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  3. Soon to be a DLC for KSP by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 2

    Soon you can experiance the difficulty and possible mayhem for yourself in Kerbal Space Program. NASA is working with Squad to bring an official
    DLC to KSP highlighting this mission.

    Should be an absolute blast....and a huge feather in the cap for an indie game companys first foray into gaming. Especially since it is still in development (kind of an alpha game with an entire community of beta testers (and one place where beta doesn't suck!) If you have an interest, it is a truly unique game and well worth the pittance they are charging for it.

    http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/content/252-To-The-Mun-and-Back

    --
    Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  4. What could possibly go wrong? by Lije+Baley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Armageddon/Deep Impact 2: NASA mission accidentally brings killer asteroid into collision course with earth. Or maybe a documentary on how NASA is using asteroid winter to cancel out global warming. Carefully done, we can kill only a few million poor folks every once in a while to preserve our precious beach front property.

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by n1ywb · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're talking about something the size of a boulder according to TFA. Earth gets hit by objects this size all the time.

      The diameter of the biggest impactor to hit Earth on any given day is likely to be about 40 centimeters, in a given year about 4 meters, and in a given century about 20 meters.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteoroid#Frequency_of_large_meteoroid_collisions_with_Earth

      "There are other elements involved, but if size were the only factor, we'd be looking for an asteroid smaller than about 40 feet (12 meters) across," said Paul Chodas, a senior scientist in the Near-Earth Object Program Office at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A boulder-sized asteroid won't hurt anyone. The one in Russia was heavier than the Eiffel Tower. You don't think the scientists at NASA have considered this??

  5. Re:Totally Honest by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    even if true....so?

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  6. Re:Totally Honest by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    what is your point?
    One of the biggest reasons for war on earth, are resources. China is running around grabbing all that they can. The best thing for the west, if not the world, is to have mutliple sources of every element in use. That is far more likely to stop future wars.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  7. Re:When they lie it sort of discredits them. by tp1024 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    500kt is large ever since people figured out how to actually *hit* anything with the darn things.

    Back in the 50ies and 60ies you could easily be off by a mile and they'd still call it a bullseye. A few miles off wasn't unusual at all. That's not because they thought this is good, but because they knew it was the best they could do. Thus, in order to destroy a target you can't hit, you had to get a much bigger bomb in the general vicinity of your target. Because you didn't expect to be hit directly, people started building bunkered silos for their bombs and rockets. In order to destroy those, even if you couldn't expect to hit them, you needed even bigger bombs.

    The better the targeting, the smaller the bombs became. Then bunker busters were developed that could not only hit a target the size of a few hundred meters size, they could also bury themselves in the ground by some 50m and explode there, with much greater effect in terms of shock waves. These days, a few 100kt is all you need to destroy anything you want.

    In fact, for the most part, you don't need any nuclear weapons to destroy most things out there. Simply because of the accuracy of modern weaponry. Part of this is GPS, but since this is likely the first thing to be destroyed in a big war, people developed inertial guidance and other navigation systems that can do without it. Hence, 500kt is a big bomb these days and people are unlikely to build bigger ones for the foreseeable future. If only because it is much more effective hit several targets with a couple of warheads than just one or two with a big one.

  8. weaponized asteroid by thygate · · Score: 2

    Has anyone considered that this tech can be weaponized ? Of course I'm all for a planetary wide protection against space debris, but it seems that the technology to intercept and redirect asteroids and such could be used to selectively wipe out entire nations without there ever being a radiological alert going off ..