Slashdot Mirror


1870s Horse Flu Epidemic Brought US Economy To Its Knees

Nemo the Magnificent writes with this excerpt from the University of Arizona: "A new study (paywalled) published in the journal Nature provides the most comprehensive analysis to date of the evolutionary relationships of influenza virus across different host species over time... In the 1870s, an immense horse flu outbreak swept across North America. City by city and town by town, horses got sick and perhaps five percent of them died. Half of Boston burned down during the outbreak, because there were no horses to pull the pump wagons. In the West, the U.S. Cavalry was fighting the Apaches on foot because all the horses were sick... The horse flu outbreak pulled the rug out from under the economy.""

118 comments

  1. ICF by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's nothing. Just wait until the ICF hits (internal combustion flu). Tesla will be laughing all the way to the bank.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:ICF by oldhack · · Score: 1

      What a load of horse shit.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:ICF by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      I think that happened during the seventies.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:ICF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1870s?

    4. Re:ICF by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

      It seems to be a cyclical problem.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    5. Re:ICF by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Only until electron rabies sweeps the country and make all Teslas drive in reverse only...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:ICF by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Just wait until the ICF hits (internal combustion flu). Tesla will be laughing all the way to the bank.

      I think it's the other way around... Tesla cars, Boeing jets, and laptops before them have been catching the Lithium Flu. You'll know it when you see it, because it comes with *quite* the high fever...

      Here's one Model S getting some medical attention.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:ICF by mysidia · · Score: 2

      That's nothing. Just wait until the ICF hits (internal combustion flu). Tesla will be laughing all the way to the bank.

      It's called peak oil.... it just got delayed by 10 to 20 years, perhaps, due to the introduction of fracking.

      When gasoline is no longer available due to global or local resource shortages, or prices --- the same could occur again.

      It may be even worse, since the petroleum products are not merely used to fuel our vehicles, BUT they are also required to produce fertilizers, so our farms can grow enough food for us to eat, AND required to produce plastics for new products that are critical to our daily lives.

    8. Re:ICF by icebike · · Score: 1

      And here's a lowly Chevy getting the sane treatment.

      http://msn.foxsports.com/nasca...

      Same disease it turns out.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:ICF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. Just wait until the ICF hits (internal combustion flu). Tesla will be laughing all the way to the bank.

      Bah, I'm cooking up a Millionaire flu that is scheduled for release in 2015 which will vindicate Ayn Rand once and for all... Bwahahahahahah!

    10. Re:ICF by Razgorov+Prikazka · · Score: 1

      Its a bellshaped curve, not a circle. And it is going to strike hard once it hits!
      http://vimeo.com/34571708
      (talk on the report requested by the US Department of Energy)

      --
      rm -rf --no-preserve-root / ...and let /dev/null sort them out...
    11. Re:ICF by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Wipe out all the millionaires and watch society crumble without their corrupting influence and flagrant self-interest to prop it up? I'm unconvinced of the outcome, but I'm not seeing a down side... :-P

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    12. Re:ICF by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Symptoms of this mystery illness: they catch fire for no reason...

    13. Re:ICF by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      We already know how to make biofuels which are 1:1 replacements for gasoline. The most notable is butanol, which Gevo and Butamax are fighting over the rights to produce. Except only Gevo is actually trying to sell fuel, and Butamax's patent was produced at a public university. That to me makes Butamax no better than patent trolls.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:ICF by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I think it's the other way around... Tesla cars, Boeing jets, and laptops before them have been catching the Lithium Flu. You'll know it when you see it, because it comes with *quite* the high fever...

      ...yet, still not quite the same level of fever as the internal combustion flu. And the transmission rate is significantly lower.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:ICF by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Wipe out all the millionaires and watch society crumble without their corrupting influence and flagrant self-interest to prop it up? I'm unconvinced of the outcome, but I'm not seeing a down side... :-P

      Two words.

      Animal Farm.

    16. Re:ICF by boristdog · · Score: 1

      So it will affect Wankels even more?

    17. Re:ICF by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      ...or a computer flu that cripples 5% of the worlds servers. That would have quite an impact too.

    18. Re:ICF by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Runny, runny horse shit... along with horse vomit and a bunch of whinnying for the horse equivalent of chicken soup...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    19. Re:ICF by Immerman · · Score: 1

      As I remember it the story was one of the Grand Revolution falling to corruption until it looked just like the original situation. Certainly not a cheerful outcome, but at least they tried. And for a while they got a taste of freedom and equality. Better than nothing, and perhaps it will inspire the next generation to learn from their mistakes and try *better*.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    20. Re:ICF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hold it wait:

      like Benz, Rivaz, Verbiest, and Bugatti were laughing back then during the horse era (were they the 1st car manufacturers making money over fist in the mid-late 1800's)? It took them another 25-35yrs (1905) to be laughing to the bank...

    21. Re:ICF by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      So did my old Chevy. Citation: "Car Bombs" from The Paxil Diaries (in print soon).

    22. Re:ICF by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      As I remember it the story was one of the Grand Revolution falling to corruption until it looked just like the original situation. Certainly not a cheerful outcome, but at least they tried. And for a while they got a taste of freedom and equality. Better than nothing, and perhaps it will inspire the next generation to learn from their mistakes and try *better*.

      We can hope. But Animal Farm, like its more famous peer was the product of someone who believed in the Socialist Ideal and was greatly disappointed in what it became in reality.

      Orwell didn't offer solutions, unfortunately. He left it at "He loved Big Brother" and pigs that had become indistinguishable from humans.

    23. Re:ICF by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      At least the soviets tried? You sir, are an idiot.

      Did Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot also try?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    24. Re:ICF by Immerman · · Score: 1

      If he had proposed solutions, do you really think they'd be worth much? It's not a simple problem to solve, I suspect it will take many more centuries yet. After all feudalism took centuries, maybe millenia, to evolve into a stable, thriving economic model, as did capitalism, which was able to grow out of it fairly naturally by giving the peasants and tradesmen a share of the profits to promote harder work and more "last mile" intelligence on resource allocation. And those systems both strongly favor the rich and powerful. Socialism faces a far more uphill battle.

      He saw his world trending in a certain direction and tried to warn against it. Looking around today I can't say I think much of how well we listened, especially considering his works were practically required reading in schools across the country. Then again we're over thirty years behind schedule, so maybe his warnings did do some good.

      All we can do is continue to fight for human dignity to be a guiding principle - each of us, every day, in whatever small ways we can, and occasionally in violent revolution when our leaders overstep themselves too far. (to date it's always only a been question of when, not if) I suspect the fight will continue for millenia at least, and possibly for as long as the species exists. The hunger for power over our fellow man seems to run deep in a certain percentage of the population. Perhaps there's a genetic basis for it, or it's an infectious mental disease that spreads to some of those subjected too long to the abuse and neglect of the powerful, and we can hope to one day cure our species of it. First though I think we'll have to sustainably wrest control from those so afflicted.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    25. Re:ICF by Immerman · · Score: 1

      No. The farm animals tried. As did the Soviets and the citizens of many other nations. Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin and the others cynically manipulated the revolutions to their own ends and completely sold out the citizenry who put them in power. They were the pigs. I thought that was pretty obvious if you read the story.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    26. Re:ICF by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Oh, and yes, the revolutions went badly. That's to be expected the first several times you try something completely new, or did you perform triple-axles the first time you ever strapped on ice skates? That's no reason not to try. Yes, there may be a lot of misery and death until you start to get it right, but misery and death are constants in the world, what matters is whether you are willing to face that danger in order to try to win a better future for those who follow, or simply obediently wait and hope that your masters don't decree that today is the day *you* get sacrificed for their greater glory.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    27. Re:ICF by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Wiping out the millionaires is not inconsistent with Ayn Rand's "philosophy".

      After all, they're the closest competitor to the billionaires.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:ICF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 informative - good information in this video -

  2. Sure, blame the flu by bondsbw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But I bet a little war during the previous decade had a bit more to do with the economic issues of the time.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    1. Re:Sure, blame the flu by hey! · · Score: 1

      I'd take that bet.

      If you were talking about slow economic growth immediately after the war, I'd agree that the war would be a plausible contributing factor. But I don't see how a war that ends in 1865 causes a *crash* in 1873.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Sure, blame the flu by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

      The picture was pretty complex as it turns out - there was a lot going on. But I wouldn't be surprised that the flu outbreak could have had a major impact. The economy was horse driven at the time. Imagine if cars could catch the flu and you couldn't drive them, or they even "died." That could be very disruptive to many sectors of the economy.

      The Long Depression (1873-1878)

      The period following the Civil War in the United States from 1865-1873 is generally considered one of economic prosperity. Northern owners of industry and bankers had become wealthy in the war, while cotton exports in the south within the U.S. and abroad met the growing demands of foreign manufacturing for raw materials. In addition to a developing of manufacturing at home and abroad, technological innovations led to improvements in mining, agriculture, and infrastructure.

      The Economic Costs of the Civil War

      The first and most important point is that the Civil War was expensive. In 1860 the U.S. national debt was $65 million. To put that in perspective, the national debt in 1789, the year George Washington took office, was $77 million. In other words, from 1789 to 1860, the United States spanned the continent, fought two major wars, and began its industrial growth—all the while reducing its national debt.

      We had limited government, few federal expenses, and low taxes. In 1860, on the eve of war, almost all federal revenue derived from the tariff. We had no income tax, no estate tax, and no excise taxes. Even the hated whiskey tax was gone. We had seemingly fulfilled Thomas Jefferson’s vision: “What farmer, what mechanic, what laborer ever sees a tax-gatherer of the United States?”

      Four years of civil war changed all that forever. In 1865 the national debt stood at $2.7 billion. Just the annual interest on that debt was more than twice our entire national budget in 1860. In fact, that Civil War debt is almost twice what the federal government spent before 1860.

      What’s worse, Jefferson’s vision had become a nightmare. The United States had a progressive income tax, an estate tax, and excise taxes as well. The revenue department had greatly expanded, and tax-gatherers were a big part of the federal bureaucracy.

      Furthermore, our currency was tainted. The Union government had issued more than $430 million in paper money (greenbacks) and demanded it be legal tender for all debts. No gold backed the notes.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Sure, blame the flu by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative

      But I bet a little war during the previous decade had a bit more to do with the economic issues of the time.

      Not as much as you might think.

      The country was 50% urban by census definition in 1860. Northern industry, agriculture and transportation prospered mightily during and after the war. The South no longer had a veto over economic development.

      Cotton production in the South recovered rapidly. COTTON PRODUCTION FACTS STATISTICS OF THE YIELD FOR TWENTY YEARS.; STATISTICS OF THE YIELD FOR TWENTY YEARS. 1850-1880

    4. Re:Sure, blame the flu by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The epidemic happened in 1872. Milton Friedman's book puts that right in the middle of a period of economic growth that would last a few years longer. So basically, you're right.

      I'm not sure why the summary thinks "the US economy was brought to its knees." Nowhere in the article does it say what data they are using. So I'm not sure it had such a huge impact. People still found ways to carry their goods to market, still found ways to fight Indians.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Sure, blame the flu by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why the summary thinks "the US economy was brought to its knees." Nowhere in the article does it say what data they are using.

      You never heard of the Panic of 1873 or the Long Depression?

      The Panic of 1873 and the subsequent depression had several underlying causes, of which economic historians debate the relative importance. Post-war inflation, rampant speculative investments (overwhelmingly in railroads), a large trade deficit, ripples from economic dislocation in Europe resulting from the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871), property losses in the Chicago (1871) and Boston (1872) fires, and other factors put a massive strain on bank reserves, which plummeted in New York City during September and October 1873 from $50 million to $17 million.

      Note those fires were mentioned in TFA.

      Horse flu wasn't the only factor; there had been some speculative bubbles and other causes, but it was certainly a contributing factor and possibly the trigger.

  3. only a fool fights in a burning house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The horses are sick, Boston's on fire, we'll fight those Apaches anyway!

    1. Re:only a fool fights in a burning house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think the Apaches were riding?

    2. Re:only a fool fights in a burning house by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      What do you think the Apaches were riding?

      Horses were relatively new technology for the natives back then. They'd just have to revert to pre-European behavior.

      Besides, if there's any truth to the stereotype, Apaches excelled at stealth, which is a lot harder to achieve if there's a great big noisy horse sticking out of the landscape.

    3. Re:only a fool fights in a burning house by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >What do you think the Apaches were riding?

      Apaches usually run on Linuxes, but they are being killed off by the nginxes.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:only a fool fights in a burning house by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      No written language. They didn't remember the pre-horse days.

      Horses had already drastically changed Indian life. Made raider tribes dominant.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:only a fool fights in a burning house by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      No written language. They didn't remember the pre-horse days.

      Horses had already drastically changed Indian life. Made raider tribes dominant.

      Ever heard of "oral history"? It's all most people had until fairly recently - how recent depends on where you lived. Stuff like the Eddas or the Kalevela were originally oral.

      Raiding isn't dependent on fast transportation either. You just have to be faster (or more elusive) than your pursuit. It wasn't like raiding was something new invented because horses were now available.

  4. What cowboy movies mention this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not true if it doesn't exist in any cowboy movies.

    1. Re:What cowboy movies mention this? by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      It's not true if it doesn't exist in any cowboy movies.

      That's a fair point. I don't recall ever hearing of any cowboy movies featuring plagues or epidemics as part of the movie even if individuals became sick. Of course there were a number of them in history, such a small pox, etc. The flu epidemic is one I don't recall hearing about before though. It should make for some interesting follow up reading.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:What cowboy movies mention this? by hey! · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't see any war movies which feature epidemics, either, even though infectious disease has killed more soldiers in war than battle wounds.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:What cowboy movies mention this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's "The Way West" starring Kirk Douglas where smallpox is a plot point and much more recently there's the miniseries "Broken Trail" starring Robert Duvall where in one scene he kills a man whose line of work is selling smallpox-exposed blankets to indians. IIRC smallpox is in "Little Big Man" as well.

    4. Re:What cowboy movies mention this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there was an epidemic in an episode of Firefly once, does that count?

    5. Re:What cowboy movies mention this? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      That's a fair point. I don't recall ever hearing of any cowboy movies featuring plagues or epidemics as part of the movie even if individuals became sick.

      I"m pretty sure that Westerns like Big Valley featured epidemics at some point.

    6. Re:What cowboy movies mention this? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Both deadwood, and the far cheesier Hell on Wheels featured small pox.

      I'd go as far to say that small pox in western themed serials is cliche, you know it's going to be the running story as soon as someone coughs.

      Not as much in movies, I assume because unless it's the main point of a movie there's not much space for it.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:What cowboy movies mention this? by milage · · Score: 1

      Hud featured foot-and-mouth disease

  5. Re:what is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Scroll down right to the very bottom of this page, and click "Slashdot Classic".

  6. Why does the site look so terrible all of a sudden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh, the new site is just awful, I come to read comments, not stupid summaries. I can get that on any other site. Please revert the site back!

  7. That outbreak had a name by QilessQi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Folks at the time called it the Great Epizootic* of 1872: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E... . In cities where it hit hardest, men were reportedly pulling carts in the streets because of the shortage of horses.

    *pronouced ep-eh-zoo-AH-tick

    1. Re:That outbreak had a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      The economy recovered six years after the Panic of 1873. It's already been twelve years since 9/11. What the fuck is wrong with you, 21st century America?

    2. Re:That outbreak had a name by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. Very interesting.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:That outbreak had a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9/11 wasn't the breakpoint of the economy, that was 2007 or so.

    4. Re:That outbreak had a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh-huh. Uh-huh. And I believe you, don't I, because you were alive in 2001? I was there. I remember the budget cuts. "Whoops some planes hit some buildings so we'll need some temporary budget cuts to support the troops." 2002 "Yeah, 'nother round of budget cuts, totally temporary, the troops, you understand." 2003 "Whoa! 'Nother war! Gotta get that baastard bad guy. Budget cuts." 2004 "Yeah we're gonna go ahead and make those temporary budget cuts permanent, then we'll have some more temporary budget cuts on the way too! Support those troops!!" .....ten years later...... "Well obviously you didn't need a budget everything's going just fine with nothing right? But you treasure your freedom, right, the troops are worth it, right, let's do less with more, most with least, and everything with nothing! Thank a veteran for existing! God knows what they did but whatever it was it's all worth the massive drain on the economy!!!!!!!"

    5. Re:That outbreak had a name by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      9/11 wasn't the breakpoint of the economy

      But a large contributing factor: ...the outbreak of a great fire in the heart of the city of Boston on November 9th was a disaster. Firemen were reduced to moving all of the necessary firefighting equipment by hand, and the size of the fire in this particular incident did not allow for such slow movement to be effective. The firefighting sans horse power was so ineffective that the fire raged on to become one of the worst disasters in the history of the city. Reports indicate that the blaze killed 13 people, destroyed 776 buildings, and caused $75 million in damages – the current equivalent of roughly $3.5 billion.

  8. Flu came from horses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard of Avian bird flu, the Swine Pig Flu, the Hantavirus Mouse flu and now finally the Equus Bronco Bronchial Tube Flu.

    1. Re:Flu came from horses? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's right - horses flu back then. I'm sure you've heard of horsefeathers.

    2. Re:Flu came from horses? by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      I've heard of Avian bird flu, the Swine Pig Flu, the Hantavirus Mouse flu and now finally the Equus Bronco Bronchial Tube Flu.

      While I see this study with some reservations FTA:
      According to Worobey, the newly generated evolutionary trees show a global replacement of the genes in the avian flu virus coinciding closely with the horse flu outbreak, which the analyses also reveal to be the closest relative to the avian virus.

      So your call, is the relative a parent or child. The evolutionary trees mentioned show nothing that can be called useful.

  9. Still think it's a good idea.... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...for cars to have a kill chip?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  10. The Hand Of God Strikes To Kill Humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God was very ANGRY with humans in the 1800s.

    God thought to himself: Man is vile and vengeful, how can I kill Man? Ah Ha! The Answer came down to God! And God was grateful!

    So be history.

  11. What I found interesting: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Half of Boston burned down during the outbreak, because there were no horses to pull fire engines, hose reels, and ladder carts. In the West, the U.S. Cavalry was fighting the Apaches on foot because their horses were sick."

  12. EGW by oldhack · · Score: 1

    Centuries of horse shit spewing methane into the atmosphere brought about Equine Global Warming, leading to the flu epidemic.

    If only we had Al Gore back then...

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:EGW by u38cg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, horses have a single stomach and produce minimal, if any, methane.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:EGW by 2sheds · · Score: 1

      Horses may be monogastric but they have caeca, i.e. a highly developed hind-gut fermentation system. Although they don't need to and indeed cannot eructate (the main source of methane emissions in cattle), they still contribute their fair share. And don't forget decomposition products from manure. The best thing you can say about any form of agricultural methane emission is that the animals involved are on a relatively short carbon cycle - they release carbon that has only recently been fixed from the atmosphere; it's the logistics and infrastructure that goes with supporting, say, intensively produced feedlot cattle (gas for tractors and shipping, intensive feed production etc.) that is damaging.

      --

      Absit Invidia
    3. Re:EGW by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Had to go and look it up. More than I thought - about a third of a cow. But on the other hand, there are at least an order of magnitude more cows out there.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  13. Bull by Yahooti · · Score: 1

    If it's behind a paywall, it didn't happen.

  14. ./ sinks to a new low by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 0

    News for Nerds?

    In the 1800's horses died.

    Computers? Internet? Technology? bad laws regarding tech?

    Anyone? Some help here?

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:./ sinks to a new low by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the thing; nerds are interested in darn near everything.

      The ability for a non-human disease to cause such a negative impact is interesting. The impact of loss of transportation on the economy, even an ancient one, is also interesting.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:./ sinks to a new low by dryeo · · Score: 1

      That was how technology was then. I find it interesting as well as other things about the age, like the problems caused by all the horse shit.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:./ sinks to a new low by u38cg · · Score: 2

      Well, at least they still get the slash and the dot in the right order.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    4. Re:./ sinks to a new low by westlake · · Score: 2

      The ability for a non-human disease to cause such a negative impact is interesting.

      The horse was a big city crisis.

      A 1000-pound horse will defecate from 4 to 13 times per day. On the average, this horse's manure will contain about 31 pounds of feces and 2.4 gallons (~ 20 pounds) of urine, totaling up to 50 pounds of manure (not including bedding) per day as excreted.

      Stall Waste Production

      New York City had 100,000 horses on the streets in 1900. The stench of the manure could be over-powering and flies spread diseases. Dead horses were simply shoved to the sides of streets in summer, as you can see in uncensored photographs of the era. It was simply impossible to clear the carcasses quickly enough.

    5. Re:./ sinks to a new low by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yes, the pollution from horses, the support structure for horses, is a big part of what drove any option to not need a horse. Electric cable cars, for example. Cars vastly simplified the logistics(because you also needed to ship in ~50 pounds of fodder for said horses every day) as well.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    6. Re:./ sinks to a new low by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I too picked this as the most 'behind the times' that slashdot has ever been, usually it's only a couple of weeks.

  15. Re:Why does the site look so terrible all of a sud by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    I thought you were talking about the content for a minute.

    I mean, seriously, who venerates the genocide of one's native peoples 144 years after the fact? Shame, Slashdot...

  16. Poor US Calvalry by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Committing genocide on foot is tiring work.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Poor US Calvalry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's taking them so long? There are so many Apache servers still running.

    2. Re:Poor US Calvalry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's okay, they can use steam Nginx now!

    3. Re:Poor US Calvalry by S.I.O. · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, they were unpatched Apache, so it was easy to find their weak spot.

    4. Re:Poor US Calvalry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PHP admin console?

    5. Re:Poor US Calvalry by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      We should Sioux them.

    6. Re:Poor US Calvalry by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, they were unpatched Apache, so it was easy to find their weak spot.

      Yes, IIS may have won the west, but thanks in part to its susceptibility to virus, the Apache came back to dominate the world.

  17. Re:ICF, no, just a virus by tchdab1 · · Score: 2

    How long before a software virus cripples a good amount of cars and brings "transportation to a halt"?

  18. Don't use technical terms unless you know their me by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's called peak oil.... it just got delayed by 10 to 20 years, perhaps, due to the introduction of fracking.

    Don't use technical terms unless you know their meaning. Peak oil looks like it happened in 2008 because it's the maximum point on the graph of crude oil extraction over time. Gas from shale, coal, whatever is something else.
    The term "peak oil" acquired a lot of baggage from people who liked to oversimplify things and pretend that crude oil was the only form of energy. The post above is a good example of being influenced by that baggage.

  19. Uh oh by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    The Silicon Spotted Fever Epidemic of 2017 is gonna be a bear ...

  20. Re:Why does the site look so terrible all of a sud by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I mean, seriously, who venerates the genocide of one's native peoples 144 years after the fact? Shame, Slashdot...

    I'm not in favor of genocide against any group — what does "native" have to do with it? Technically, we're all out of Africa, right? If you diddle the timeline, no one else is a native.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Peak oil by swb · · Score: 2

    Every time I hear about peak oil as a concept it gets turned into the idea we'll just run out, all at once.

    Why won't the pricing mechanism of markets just raise the price over time and slow consumption, or increase the use of alternatives where they exist, increase research into improving or finding new alternatives? It will also affect choices, so as food prices increase because of fertilizer price increases people will choose food over, say, power boats.

    Fracking is kind of the great example as well. AFAIK it was a known technique but not economically viable. As prices increased it was improved as a process and put into use because it was more economically viable at higher price levels.

    I have read some arguments that claim significant economic disruption as oil prices cross a certain threshold creating an amplification effect. I think one example is the use of trucks for transportation -- the cost of shipping increases it makes other activities dependent on trucking not economically viable as the transportation costs exceed the marginal value of the thing being transported. I buy this, sort of, but it doesn't take into account the adaptation of the use of localized production or alternative products being used.

    Overall I buy the idea that oil is a limited resource, but find the predictions of its increasing scarcity a lot less due to the complexity and sophistication of economies.

    1. Re:Peak oil by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Every time I hear about peak oil as a concept it gets turned into the idea we'll just run out, all at once.

      Why won't the pricing mechanism of markets just raise the price over time and slow consumption, or increase the use of alternatives where they exist, increase research into improving or finding new alternatives? It will also affect choices, so as food prices increase because of fertilizer price increases people will choose food over, say, power boats.

      Fracking is kind of the great example as well. AFAIK it was a known technique but not economically viable. As prices increased it was improved as a process and put into use because it was more economically viable at higher price levels.

      I have read some arguments that claim significant economic disruption as oil prices cross a certain threshold creating an amplification effect. I think one example is the use of trucks for transportation -- the cost of shipping increases it makes other activities dependent on trucking not economically viable as the transportation costs exceed the marginal value of the thing being transported. I buy this, sort of, but it doesn't take into account the adaptation of the use of localized production or alternative products being used.

      Overall I buy the idea that oil is a limited resource, but find the predictions of its increasing scarcity a lot less due to the complexity and sophistication of economies.

      That's hard to say because nothing is ever as simple as it ought to be. Pricing could slowly rise, but markets are often more likely to stampede. We could have alternative energy sources (and fertilizer sources) ready to roll, but the current energy barons don't want to risk the possibility that someone else could get rich instead of them and don't want cheaper energy as long as they can make more from oil. So alternative approaches are ignored, locked up, even suppressed in favor of more toxic (but more profitable) solutions. And to add the suspenders to the belt, they've ensured that a lot of yelping guard dogs defend what they are doing no matter what it does to the long-term success of the species.

      Historically, we just lurch along, and I doubt things will be any different here.

    2. Re:Peak oil by swb · · Score: 2

      But isn't the history of oil consumption a de facto demonstration of pricing? As demand increases, prices increase and production technology improves? The 1970s brought off-shore and deep water oil production, followed by increasingly more fuel efficient cars (as one example).

      Contemporary pricing has given us hybrid and viable electric cars. Fracking and tar sands have extended oil production. Even trucking has gotten aerodynamic.

    3. Re:Peak oil by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      But isn't the history of oil consumption a de facto demonstration of pricing? As demand increases, prices increase and production technology improves? The 1970s brought off-shore and deep water oil production, followed by increasingly more fuel efficient cars (as one example).

      Contemporary pricing has given us hybrid and viable electric cars. Fracking and tar sands have extended oil production. Even trucking has gotten aerodynamic.

      It also brought us the Energy Crisis.

      I'm not saying that adjustments don't occur. Just that market trends carry an immense amount of momentum. Boom-and-bust are by no means unique to the energy industry. Recent events in the housing industry are another example. But it's not like people didn't see things coming. Remember "irrational exuberance"? Just that too often we swing from one extreme to the other. People get hurt that way.

  22. What Budget Cuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spending under the very non-conservative GWB exploded. Spend money for TSA, spend money for Department of Homeland Security. Start new entitlement program to win Grandma and Grampa's vote by buying their prescription meds. Start unnecessary wars followed by "Nation Building." No need to Veto any bill. That wouldn't be very "compassionate."

  23. Horse Knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough said

  24. Tough times by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    Ah, remember it like it were yesterday. The ride through at the McDonald's was deserted for years.

  25. And then the trains got sick by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    and that really impacted the economy.

  26. Re:ICF, no, just a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People call in sickie in mass because their in-car entertainment systems only show a picture of the Guy Fawkes mask. There is no person who dares challenging the rush hour without their in-car entertainment system working.

  27. ECV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it'll be the electronic car virus. Of course, you will be directed to purchase Norton Antivirus for Cars.

  28. Re:ICF, no, just a virus by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    2018 is the all ing car mandate iirc.

  29. Car Virus by alta · · Score: 1

    Some of you guys are joking about a car virus, but it's not a stretch of the imagination at all.

    15 years ago that couldn't happen, but now cars have built in cellular data. Some have built in hotspots. Not just high end cars but cheap cars can get on facebook now either through dedicated cellular data or tethering off your phone. We saw just a few weeks ago that they're trying to make cars that talk to each other for 'safety' reasons. Once they can do that a car to car virus is even easier.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:Car Virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am more worried about the GM vehicles with OnStar. One phone call, and the vehicle is disabled. Granted, the promise is that is is only used in cases of theft, but a malicious person could disable whole fleets of vehicles by reverse engineering the protocol. Probably not encrypted and pretty simple, relying on obscurity. I'd rather drive a purely mechanical vehicle instead.

  30. What's wrong? Flu Shot Takers Waning?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having problems getting people to take the flu shot now?

    Take your infected crap to some other planet.

  31. Re:Don't use technical terms unless you know their by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Peak oil looks like it happened in 2008 because it's the maximum point on the graph of crude oil extraction over time. Gas from shale, coal, whatever is something else.

    NO. Peak oil refers to M. King Hubbert's theory about a bell-shaped pattern, and it is inclusive of all fossil fuels.

  32. but nothing else by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    Which BIO fuel can be used to make plastics? We need to switch before oil isn't available for all of the "other things" we need it for.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:but nothing else by Reziac · · Score: 1
      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  33. Post literate nonsense by dbIII · · Score: 1

    A video as citation? That's a bit insulting if you expect me to take you seriously.
    Note it's called peak oil and the likely peak of coal production is probably many decades away.

    1. Re:Post literate nonsense by mysidia · · Score: 1

      A video as citation? That's a bit insulting if you expect me to take you seriously.

      The medium doesn't matter. It's perfectly valid, notwithstanding your elitist high-horse act. I think what you find insulting, is that the authorities don't share your highly narrow idea as to what the concept of peak oil refers to.

      Note it's called peak oil and the likely peak of coal production is probably many decades away.

      Yes. But 'oil' does not mean crude oil; it means all the oil products, which include gasoline ---- but not coal.

    2. Re:Post literate nonsense by dbIII · · Score: 1

      notwithstanding your elitist high-horse act

      Ah yes, the tyranny of the "elites" with their book reading instead of picking up random unconnected bits of shit and connecting them the wrong way in between watching music videos.
      WTF is it with these people who get the wrong idea and then decide to lecture others about it before they come close to understanding it themselves?

  34. Definition shifting by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Let me remind you that you had " it is inclusive of all fossil fuels" of all fossil fuels in the above attempt at petty lecturing. I wonder if you are going to shift your definition every time I point out a stunningly obvious flaw in your silly personal definition such as coal being a fossil fuel.
    As for me - I'll go with what the geophysicists call it instead of your gut feeling.