Slashdot Mirror


Why Your Phone Gets OTA Updates But Your Car Doesn't

New submitter kjbullis writes with this snippet from Technology Review: "When Toyota recalled over two million cars last week because of flaws with antilock braking systems and other problems, the fix was simple — a few software updates .The implementation of that fix is far from simple. Every one of those cars has to be taken into a dealership to have the new software installed, an expensive process that can take months. Cars that haven't been fixed could, in some cases, suddenly stall and crash. There is an alternative — the same sort of remote software updates used for PCs and smart phones. Indeed, one automaker, Tesla Motors, already provides what it calls 'over-the-air updates,' which allowed it to execute a recent software fix without requiring anybody to bring in their cars. But other automakers are dragging their feet, both because they're worried about security and because they might face resistance from dealers."

5 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. Umm safety? by fsck-beta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because a bad update on the phone won't cause a high speed fiery wreck.

    1. Re:Umm safety? by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also a phone has communication capabilities built right in. A car... not so much.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Umm safety? by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well the hardware's cheap, and considering the miniscule data usage I'm pretty sure they could work out something with cell companies - the "phone" wouldn't even need to be on but for a few minutes a month. Wifi support would probably be even cheaper, if not quite as convenient.

      I suspect security and inertia are a bigger issues - auto manufacturers have got to be aware of how atrocious their security is, but at present it needs physical access to attack - and if you've got physical access all safety bets are off anyway. I doubt any company wants their cars to be the first to to be used as Anonymous assassination tools, that's the sort of publicity that could decimate their business.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  2. Call me paranoid... by Forbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but I'd rather not add any more attack vectors than absolutely essential.

  3. brick your car by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although it doesn't happen as often these days, I do remember OTA updates bricking my phone in the past, and PCs under my care are still occasionally screwed up by "drive-by updates" in the middle of the night. For something like a car with the potential for property damage or stranding me and mine far from civilization, I'm pretty sure I don't want automatic OTA updates, even if they could arrange that the car not be moving during the time. I want to know exactly what problem the update is solving, the likelihood I will experience that problem, whether the update and backout procedures have been vetted, and the post-update test procedure. I make a living with my camera, and I don't blindly install firmware updates for it either.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.