The Science of Social Participation

cold fjord writes in with this story about research that breaks down Twitter conversations in 6 basic types."The Pew Research Center and the Social Media Research Foundation analyzed thousands of twitter conversations going back to 2010. They found these conversations occurred based on the structure of the individual's Twitter network. For example, the subjects and content that a person tweets about, the people they follow, the people who follow them and the way they network creates a structure of social activity. In a recently released report Pew reports that they uncovered six distinct patterns for these structures. 'These are data-driven early steps in understanding Twitter discussion structures that contribute to the emerging science of social participation,' Ben Shneiderman professor of computer science at the University of Maryland ... 'This new field is emerging right before our eyes and could eventually have a large impact on our understanding of everything from health to community safety, from business innovation to citizen science and from civic engagement to sustainable energy programs.' ... 'These maps provide insights into people's behavior in a way that complements and expands on traditional research methods ... '"

Comments

Re:Yeesh

[Mashiki]

But "social scientists" know all, see all, eat all, and tell you where to shit at the end of the day.

Re:What?

[Anonymous Coward]

Submitter "cold fjord" is one unit of a US government sockpuppet team which uses the type of data analysed by the Pew Research Center to improve their ability to influence readers here.

Slashdot is also part of the research - he's trying to assess how much of the readership is aware of the monitoring.