Slashdot Mirror


Steve Jobs To Appear On US Postage Stamp

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Steven Musil writes at Cnet that the US Postal Service hopes Steve Jobs can do for it what he once did for Apple as the late Apple co-founder will be featured on a commemorative US postage stamp along with Johnny Carson, Ingrid Bergman, Elvis Presley, and James Brown. The former Apple CEO's stamp is still in the design stages and will be released at some point in 2015. Jobs, who passed away in 2011 after a battle with pancreatic cancer, has also been posthumously honored for his visionary achievements with a special Grammy Merit Award and a Disney Legends Award. Jobs was also inducted into the Bay Area Business Hall of Fame, has had a building at Pixar named after him, and was featured in an exhibit at the US Patent Office Museum. "The profitable first class mail business has been decimated by email over the past decade, thanks in no small part to the contributions of Steve Jobs and Apple," writes Derek Kessler. "It's no small feat to be so impactful that the USPS feels compelled to honor you despite the fact that the work that you've done is dismantling the core of their business.""

37 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the stamp will be a little bit more expensive than usual and it comes only in 2 colors.

    1. Re: Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And don't forget the rounded corners!!!

    2. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      despite the fact that the work that you've done is dismantling the core of their business

      Yes, all the advances made in email, texting & IMing were made possible by Apple.
      No wonder journalists are considered a joke these days.

    3. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No Forever Stamps either. You'll definitely have to buy another one in a few months.

    4. Re:Obviously.. by SpankiMonki · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget a stamp for Michael Jackson. It could even make a "hee hee" sound when licked.

    5. Re:Obviously.. by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Funny

      It will only be available in one color, that no one really wants, to begin with, and then ~6 months later, it will become available in the color you really do want, forcing you to buy a second roll of stamps... That's what the USPS is counting on - selling twice as many stamps!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    6. Re:Obviously.. by russbutton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dunno. Will his ego fit into a 3/4" square?

    7. Re:Obviously.. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      And if you try to use the stamp to pay a medical bill it will come back ""returned to sender." Letters to your guru or the guy who runs the juice bar will go through. And obviously the stamps expire after six months.

    8. Re:Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not seeing any understanding of sarcasm. Reading comprehension problems?

      Some contribution? Just being there doesn't count. They've made no significant contribution to it in any way.

      From the biased linked company bullshit Since determining the client in which an email is opened requires images to be displayed, the data for some email clients and mobile devices might be over- or under-represented due to automatic image blocking.

      Useless statistics considering how many mail clients block images. This data is as useful as using Ferrari drivers as a basis for all driving habits.

    9. Re:Obviously.. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 3, Funny

      As long as you're going for novelty why not a Jerry Garcia stamp? When you lick it you're dosed with a small amount of LSD. Initially the stamp is simply a black and white image, but after a few minutes, wow!

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    10. Re:Obviously.. by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, it will only work with Apple envelopes.

  2. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone can give his backside a lick.....

  3. Rod Serling by Megane · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was going to mention that Rod Serling needed a stamp, too. There's been a petition since 1988. But apparently he finally got one in 2009, so we can finally send our mail to... The Twilight Zone.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  4. Stamp will cost $4 by hessian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stamp will cost $4, do the same thing that $0.49 stamp does but have stylistic design. If anything goes wrong, you throw the whole letter out and buy a new one based on someone else's refurbished mail. If you mention this bad experience online, ten thousand Steve Jobs fanboys attack your inbox with gay pornography to "open your mind."

    1. Re:Stamp will cost $4 by StripedCow · · Score: 2

      And it is only compatible with letterboxes from one company.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  5. Chinese Stamp? by ad454 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering that apple out-sourced all of their manufacturing overseas, it seems that China and not the USA should be the ones honouring Steve Jobs with a stamp.

    Alternatively, if the USPS wants to honour Steve Jobs in a historically accurate way, they could design the stamp in the USA, have China produce the stamps, and then sell those Chinese made stamps to Americans.

    1. Re: Chinese Stamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Way to back that up with a source. (Since Jobs death, some manufacturing is moving back)
      Also, go suck an egg with that elitist who cares about low tier jobs attitude.

  6. DRM, copyright, trademarked by Teun · · Score: 4, Funny
    How long before Apple sues the USPS for copyright infringement and Trademark dilution?

    Maybe they'll be OK with the stamp DRM'ed.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  7. Pathetic by AntiBasic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, let's honor a "man" who was a billionaire who refused to acknowledge his daughter's existence for 17 years, while she and her mother lived paycheck to paycheck. While this was going on, he named a computer after her.

    1. Re:Pathetic by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I kind of agree. Even without the personal baggage, I'd feel better if our stamps honored contributions to humanity, not stylistic creativity, monopolistic business strategies, or modern day robber baron philosophy. I recognize his contribution to technological progress, I just don't think, on balance, that we should honor him with a stamp. That's just my gut reaction...I could be wrong.

      --
      The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
    2. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recognize his contribution to technological progress

      I don't. He was a miserable human being with very limited technical skills that had a knack for knowing what would sell, and of making the public believe he was responsible for the work done by others.

    3. Re:Pathetic by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 2

      While we're at it let's make a stamp of Adolf Hitler. He also was a bad person who advanced technology.

  8. Re:Forget Jobs by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bieber stamp: Costs $4 but is worthless for postage, looks like a drunk lesbian, adhesive has bad taste and won't stick to envelopes

  9. instead of artsy fartsy designer by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    shouldn't Woz be on a stamp for whatever technological and contribution to progress the Apple systems have made?

    1. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      in 2011 the USPO said living people were eligible to be honored on stamps also

    2. Re:instead of artsy fartsy designer by pauljlucas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's generally not a good idea to commemorate a living person because they still have the potential to end up in a scandal or do something embarrassing.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  10. Dennis Ritchie instead! by rstanley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dennis Ritchie, the creator of the C Programming Language, along with Ken Thompson, co-creators of the UNIX Operating System, Brian Kernighan, and many, many others, laid the groundwork for ALL Operating Systems, and technology that followed. Linux, all flavors of UNIX, Android, etc... lead the world in O/S's, NOT Apple.

    Steve Jobs would still be a amateur Geek in his garage if it were not for all the Giants of the industry that came before.

    Considering that they only died 6 days apart, where is Dennis's stamp?

    Dennis's home page: http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dm...

    1. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by GoJays · · Score: 2

      I agree, Dennis should have a stamp long before Jobs... He won't though because the average person doesn't know who Dennis Ritchie is while everybody knows who Steve Jobs is.

    2. Re:Dennis Ritchie instead! by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It isn't about honoring him, exactly; when they put someone famous on the stamp, people will want to collect the stamps. That's why they chose Jobs, because it will essentially be a money maker for the post office.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re: Dennis Ritchie instead! by NapalmV · · Score: 2

      Oh c'mon. We all know the truth, regardless of it being relegated as an April fool's joke:

      https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/unix-hoax.html
      .

  11. Re:Forget Jobs by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    Since he has to be dead before they'll put him on a stamp.......

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  12. Would have to use a proprietary Apple envelope by mrflash818 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You would have to use a proprietary Apple envelope, or the stamp wouldn't stick.

    The Apple envelope would be prettier than a regular envelope, but cost twice as much, too.

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  13. Instead..... by Dega704 · · Score: 2

    How about a Dennis Ritchie stamp? Or Douglas Engelbart? John E. Karlin maybe? They all recently died as well. Anyone? No? Nobody knows who they are because they spent their time actually inventing instead of whoring for attention and taking all the credit to satisfy their nacissism? Damn.

  14. What about Dennis Ritchie? by Punto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He died the same year, and was way more important than Steve Jobs.

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  15. Meh by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

    So has Bugs Bunny and Mickey Mouse, amongst other cartoon characters.

  16. Oh Steve Jobs... by Buck+Feta · · Score: 2

    Still pushing the envelope.

    --
    I am Audience.
  17. Re: What emailer did he write? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    That's not really the point. Apple was not instrumental in any way to to the development of email or any of the associated support technologies. It doesn't matter how good or bad the MacOS bundleware email client is. Apple simply isn't that relevant to the development of the Internet, email, or the web.

    Even the connection with NexT is tenuous at best.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.