Slashdot Mirror


Study Shows Agent Orange Still Taints Aging C-123s

__roo writes "Herbicides used in Vietnam in the 1970s still pose a threat to servicemen, according to a study published Friday. The U.S. Air Force and Department of Veteran Affairs denied benefits to sick veterans, taking the position that any dioxin or other components of Agent Orange contaminating its fleet of C-123 cargo planes would have been 'dried residues' and unlikely to pose meaningful exposure risks. According to the lead researcher, 'The VA, whether out of ignorance or malice, has denied the entire existence of this entire branch of science. They have this preposterous idea that somehow there is this other kind of state of matter — a dried residue that is completely inert.' To show that such exposures happened, her research team had to be 'very clever.'"

16 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. criminals!!! by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if it was a private company that did not have a fascist relationship with the government you know the EPA would be all up in their asses

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  2. Enough witht the hyperbole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not saying that dried residues aren't dangerous, but the researcher's quote in the summary comes off as extremely disingenuous.

    Of course being exposed to dried residues will result in much lower levels of exposure than being REPEATEDLY DOUSED with liquid herbicide as were field infantry in the Vietnam war.

    Toxicology is all about maximum safe dosages - scary sounding toxins like arsenic, radon, dioxin, mercury, and even radionucleotides are pervasive in our environment. The question is whether the level of exposure is biologically significant or not. While the VA's contention that the levels of exposure to Agent Orange residues is safe is a valid matter for debate, they nowhere claim that it has magically transformed into some heretofore unknown state of matter.

  3. Malice? I think not. by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a 'Nam vet and I get all of my health care from the VA. With very, very rare exceptions, everybody I've dealt with over the last several decades has understood that if it weren't for people like me, they wouldn't have their government jobs. Once in a while, I'll grant, there's a paper-pusher who's more interested in making sure that the forms are filled out than in giving good service, but almost everybody who is involved in caring for veterans and their dependents gives good, prompt, cheerful service. If the VA has been denying that dioxins in C-123s is a hazard, there are many possible reasons, but malice is the least likely of all. As in everything else, ignorance is always a much more probable reason.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  4. Re:Malice? I think not. by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My father was a service connected disabled (both physical and mental) WW2 Vet and I would strongly disagree with this assessment. I took care of him for many years and struggled with the VA - although they did increase his pension towards the end.

    The VA psych doctors were compassionless, unprofessional and bottom of the class grade doctors and I would often have to research the drugs they were prescribing and inform them of the side-effects and suitability to his condition. They eventually killed my father by over prescribing drugs like Haldol and other harsh psychotropics.

  5. Re:Malice? I think not. by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All I can say is, what I reported is not just my own personal experience, but that of every vet I know who uses the VA. I'm sorry that you ran across a set of bad apples, and that they did your father's condition so much damage. And, I'll agree that the psych departments are probably the worst; I needed help from them at one point and I had to fight with the person doing the original write-up to get her to describe my complaints as I told them to her, instead of re-writing them to fit her own pre-conceived ideas. (She simply couldn't understand that I could be unemployed, broke and depressed without being violent and/or suicidal.)

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  6. Re:Malice? I think not. by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All I can say is, what I reported is not just my own personal experience, but that of every vet I know who uses the VA. I'm sorry that you ran across a set of bad apples, and that they did your father's condition so much damage. And, I'll agree that the psych departments are probably the worst; I needed help from them at one point and I had to fight with the person doing the original write-up to get her to describe my complaints as I told them to her, instead of re-writing them to fit her own pre-conceived ideas. (She simply couldn't understand that I could be unemployed, broke and depressed without being violent and/or suicidal.)

    I understand we each have our experiences. Yes the psych departments are the worst.... I didn't really have a problem with the physical medical care side of things. In fact I would agree that the teams assigned to the general medical side generally do a good job.

    People need to understand that wars produce causalities and those causalities need to be taken care... sometimes for the rest of their lives. A war is never over until the last person involved dies.

  7. Re:Malice? I think not. by macraig · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The VA folks you have encountered are all rank-and-file types and none of them top brass, correct? If so then your analogy is misleading, since the people we are discussing here are in fact the decision-makers and the adverse consequences of their decisions. While the rank and file folks may be very humane people, experience has (or should have) taught us that the majority of top brass in every human hierarchy are sociopaths, not humane people. Your anecdote is not representative of those people, and they are the subject here.

  8. Re:Malice? I think not. by Nutria · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All I can say is, what I reported is not just my own personal experience, but that of every vet I know who uses the VA.

    Did you all use the same VA hospital?

    I know that the quality of the Principal heavily dictates the quality of the school. Maybe the same goes for hospital administrators.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  9. For the want of editors by wiredlogic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Original article title:

    Agent Orange Posed A Health Threat To Servicemen Long After Vietnam

    Slashdot headline:

    Herbicides used in Vietnam in the 1970s still pose a threat to servicemen

    These planes were repurposed for other duties during the 70's. They went out of service in 1982. They don't "still" pose a threat because nobody is using them. The issue is for the servicemen who worked on them 40 years ago.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  10. Re:Malice? I think not. by dryeo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The problem with government is sometimes the business types get in charge. It's happening in my country, veteran affairs was cut back to close to nothing, no more pensions as they're too expensive. Most all offices closed down because too expensive. Large amount of Afghanistan vets committing suicide, just a cost of business and they should have been tougher. Yet the government has lots of money for PR purposes with record amounts spent on advertising how fiscally responsible they are and what a great job they're doing.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  11. Re:Malice? I think not. by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Despite the flames I'll get for saying it and the vehement disagreement proponents will spew, that's because psychology is not a science. Not even a little bit. The human mind is far too complex a thing for the current state of our understanding to treat scientifically. Psychologists aren't much better than snake oil salesmen.

  12. Re:Malice? I think not. by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Guess I made the mistake of saying something true :)

    No, you made the mistake of thinking a doctor paid by the government is the same thing as a doctor employed by the government. Those of us who live in civilized societies know this to be false, under most (if not all) UHC schemes the government takes the role of medical insurer, not the role of care giver. The doctors and nurses are the same people under both regimes.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  13. Re:Malice? I think not. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Psychologists everywhere are the worst. It's not the VA that's the problem, it's the profession.

    Except he wasn't talking about psychologists. He was talking about psychiatrists. Not at all the same thing.

  14. vietnamese by BradMajors · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is interesting everyone ignores the greater harm agent orange is doing to the Vietnamese servicemen.

  15. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, hundreds of thousands to millions of Vietnamese were harmed depending how you count - everythings from terrible birth defects to characteristic cancers.

    And, of course, the main use of agent orange in Vietnam was to destroy the farm land so that the peasants would be forced, by starvation, to move to the cities (that happened to be controlled by the USA).

  16. Longevity of Dioxin in Agent Orange. by WebSorcerer · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am an analytical chemist, and analyzed Agent Orange while employed by the Dow Chemical Company (one of the manufacturers of Agent Orange). The spraying apparatus in the planes in the C-123 sprayed out a side door, and Agent Orange filled the air inside the plane drenching the men who operated the sprayers, and coated everything in the interior. Agent Orange is not volatile, and evaporates extremely slowly. This combination of circumstances IMHO would cause a residue of Agent Orange inside the planes which could reasonably last for decades.