Slashdot Mirror


Ford Dumping Windows For QNX In New Vehicles

innocent_white_lamb writes "Ford has announced that their in-vehicle technology called Sync will be based on Blackberry's QNX operating system and will no longer use Microsoft Windows. My own 2013 Ford Escape has the Windows-based Sync system. I wonder if they will issue an update to change it to QNX." Anonymous sources inside Ford cited reliability problems with Windows and lower licensing costs for the switch to the classic realtime OS.

13 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. Having used both by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They made the right decision. QNX is one of the more enjoyable embedded OSes (IMO YMMV of course).

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Having used both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why is my mileage going to vary if they switch to QNX? Better navigation package?

    2. Re:Having used both by certsoft · · Score: 5, Informative

      The SYNC system has nothing to do with the powertrain. It's only used for infotainment and climate control.

    3. Re:Having used both by MikeBabcock · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lower power requirements :)

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Having used both by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's why i buy cars built in America, Like Honda, toyota, and Nissan.

      You think I am joking. those three companies build more cars in the USA than Ford, GM and Chrylser.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  2. Obligatory by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/pnw...

    For all of us who feel only the deepest love and affection for the way computers have enhanced our lives, read on. At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."

    In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating: If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

    1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

    2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.

    3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue.

    For some reason you would simply accept this.

    4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

    5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads.

    6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.

    7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.

    8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

    9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

    10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off."

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Obligatory by jd2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

      10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off."

      Actually, I do press the 'Start' button to turn the engine off on my car. (Nissan Altima with keyless ignition)

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    2. Re:Obligatory by jrumney · · Score: 5, Funny

      10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off."

      Cars do seem to be catching up with Windows on that one at least.

  3. good thing ford does not make boats by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ford has announced that their in-vehicle technology called Sync

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  4. experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I rented a for focus, and drove it for about 2 months, the MSFT stuff installed in it was a total piece of junk. It would crash, hang,
    and reboot in the middle of navigating to the destination, just like a windows PC.

  5. Re:I'm just scared shitless by aussiedood · · Score: 5, Informative

    Windows Embedded has powered the ECUs in all Formula 1 cars (arguably the most technologically advanced race cars in the world) since 2008.

  6. Cheaper, really? by jhol13 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if it is really true. I'd assume that full fledged OS with all the stuff included would be better infotaintment system than QNX.
    As I do not know which version of "Windows" they use, suppose they used Android. Now they would get, for free without any development costs or time, bluetooth, wifi, 3G, UI, development tools, etc. The system would work as a bluetooth handsfree[1]. The system would, with a SIM, work as a wifi-hotspot. You would get Google Maps, i.e. navigation. Games from Play store. Etc, for free (or the price of Android if they want maps&play).

    With QNX, what do they get?

    [1] I assume Android can work as a bluetooth "device", not only as a "host".

  7. Re:Ford Explorer by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, a tired one.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/