Slashdot Mirror


Navy Won't Investigate Nuclear Pollution At San Francisco's Treasure Island

Lasrick writes "The Center for Investigative Reporting spent a year investigating whether San Francisco's Treasure Island is contaminated with radioactive material left over from the decades the island was a naval base. Treasure Island is being transferred into civilian hands, and the city of San Francisco has plans to turn it into a 'second downtown.' Despite the fact that radioactive debris has been found around the island, the Navy refuses to conduct testing that might show whether radiation cleanup should be started before development begins, Independent testing by CIR and others has found high levels of cesium 137 and other radioactive substances at several spots on the island, and by examining unclassified military documents, CIR has found that the history of the nuclear work done at Treasure Island and the lack of safety protocols at the time mean the contamination is most likely wide-spread. Complaints by current residents has only resulted in bureaucratic infighting among state health departments and the Navy."

7 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. Caveat emptor x2 by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let the buyer beware, and be extra wary when the seller is the one responsible for enforcing the safety of sellers.

    1. Re:Caveat emptor x2 by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The navy isn't a public servant.

      That aside, they probably do not want to risk their already shrinking budget getting stuck with the cleanup. Instead, once it changes hands to another government entity, congress will allocate money through the superfund process already in place to deal with stuff like this. Its a wash to the tax payers as it would only be an accounting gimmack.

  2. Re:Is it going to be paved? by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop pointing out the facts!! The alarmism sells so much better, especially when it involves R A D I A T I O N ! !

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  3. Re:Is it going to be paved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, I agree that demolition, paving, and construction does not throw up any dust. They can just paint the whole thing red first. No biggie . .. no need to test anything.

    You must always be giving out your brilliant ideas as random acts of kindness to humanity . . . or work for the NSA . . .

  4. no numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is telling that this news article, published in "The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists" contained zero quantitative radiation or dose rate information within its several thousand words. Lots of "He Said" stories but no numbers. Did the authors of the article labor under the false assumption that their intended audience was numerically illiterate or do they have nothing but unsubstantiated anecdotes?

  5. Re:Ooh Scary! by compro01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That line only applies to the cesium. The radium contamination is more relevant, as it means the building will have radon problems that will require dealing with.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  6. Re:The Army actually built this island from scratc by MrEricSir · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Except it was built for the World's Fair and intended to be re-purposed as an airport. The Navy base idea came later.

    But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of your knee-jerk response, right?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."