Slashdot Mirror


Copyright Ruling On Publishing Calculated Results: Common Sense Breaks Out

bfwebster writes "During the past few years, I served as an IT expert witness in BanxCorp v. Costco et al., in which BanxCorp sued Costco and Capital One for citing (with credit) its web-published national averages for CD and money market rates in their advertising. Judge Kenneth M. Karas issued his summary judgment opinion last fall, finding that BanxCorp's published averages are 'uncopyrightable facts' due to the simple calculation involved and the lack of ongoing human judgment in what banks were involved. Here is my summary of his findings, along with a link to the actual ruling."

2 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Bad news for Wolfram alpha by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Money trumps law

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  2. Judge Karas uses modern physics as an analogy by mpoulton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From Judge Karas' opinion: "Thus, the output data generated by using Newton’s Second Law of Motion — force equals mass times acceleration, or “F=ma” — would be a series of uncopyrightable facts, even though the output is in some sense an estimation because Newton’s formula fails does not consider relativistic effects."

    No wonder he made the right decision on this case.

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.