Slashdot Mirror


Apple To Unveil Its 'iOS In the Car' Project Next Week

An anonymous reader tips news that Apple's efforts to bring iOS to cars will be shown at the Geneva Motor Show next week. 'Drivers will be able to use Apple Maps as in-car navigation, as well as listen to music and watch films. Calls can be made through the system, which will tie into the Siri voice recognition platform so that messages can be read to the driver who can respond by dictating a reply.' Apple's partners in the automotive industry will be Volvo, Ferrari, and Mercedes Benz to start. Apple first said they were working on this system at last year's WWDC.

13 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. "Apple Maps as in-car navigation" by mrspoonsi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Way to go to kill the product before it begins...

    1. Re:"Apple Maps as in-car navigation" by jonwil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple Maps is still better than the out-of-date-before-it-even-launches navigation systems in most cars these days. The ones where you might (if you are lucky) be able to get a set of 2-year-old maps as an "update" to your system if you can find a dealer willing to sell it to you and you are willing to pay the big price.

    2. Re:"Apple Maps as in-car navigation" by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most Apple Maps issues were a side effect of an early launch.

      Maybe, but as far as I can tell, they've never fixed the somewhat hilariously misplaced POIs near me. They appear to be untouched from when I first checked them back when iOS 6 was released. (Although I see that the power substation is now a Men's Wearhouse instead of a Nordstroms, so I guess something has been updated.)

      The other Apple Maps issue is that they don't show the difference between "there's no traffic here" and "we don't collect data for this road" making their traffic reports entirely useless.

      Combine the two, and no one I know with an iDevice bothers with Apple Maps for navigation, they stick with the Google Maps app. It's still better.

      I know it borders on sacrilege to point this out but Google Maps conks out on you the moment you don't have network coverage and while it has a caching function I'll still put my trust in an old fashioned Garmin unit any time. I haven't tried the Garmin iPad app yet but if it's any good, combining it with the Garmin HUD looks like it would bee too good a nerd toy to pass up.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    3. Re:"Apple Maps as in-car navigation" by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Funny
      Son of a bitch!

      There is no way you're wrong.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re:"Apple Maps as in-car navigation" by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Their usual first-mover advantage? Has Apple ever been a first-mover? Maybe the Lisa 30 years ago, and that sold horribly. Apple's last 3 successes have been taking something that mostly sucked with a tiny market and blowing it up by making something that sucked a lot less and thus expanding the market.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  2. Uhmmm... what? by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Drivers will be able to use Apple Maps as in-car navigation, as well as listen to music and watch films.

    Say what?

    No.... seriously... what?

    Is Apple fucking insane?

  3. Ha ha Ford just signed up with Blackberry by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ford goes from Microsoft's sync (which most people call MS Stink) and signs up with the zombie corpse of a phone company blackberry. I wonder which genius company (who's shares are about to get another boost) will team up with Apple? Tesla maybe? Fiat? Ford having Blackberry will probably cause exactly 3 customers to pick ford. But Apple will attract hoards of people not only can they put an apple in their pocket but they can get into the pocket of an apple.

    1. Re:Ha ha Ford just signed up with Blackberry by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ford goes from Microsoft's sync (which most people call MS Stink) and signs up with the zombie corpse of a phone company blackberry.

      Blackberry owns QNX - one of the oldest and most-respected real time operating systems in production. It's got a rock solid reputation for reliability and stability in embedded applications. Ford made a good choice going with them.

  4. Glad someone is finally getting in on this one by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Every in-car nav system I've looked at has terrible reviews; even the dealership told me not to sweat going for the GPS option in my new car. I've got this big fancy LCD and a fancy audio system and a cell phone, but no one to tie them together.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  5. iPod connectors/compatibility since at least '06 by swb · · Score: 3, Informative

    For my '07 S80-V8 an iPod connector and in-dash stereo integration was a factory option (which I added).

    It works pretty well -- playlists, artists, etc. It's the "older" dock connector so a 30 pin iPhone complains about it and won't charge, but I just put in an old 60 GB iPod and leave it in there and run my iPhone off a ProClip holder with a lightning-30pin adapter run to a split USB/aux cable that connects to the AUX in, so I can have iPhone audio on the stereo, too. It's kind of a Rube Goldberg setup, but the cables are neat and its nice to do podcasts or Pandora if I want.

    Bluetooth would be better overall (less stuff, less cords) but the bluetooth from that year isn't as nice as the iPod control is.

    I wonder why Apple can't make AirPlay mirroring with touch to an in-dash display a standard. For makers, it would make it something Android could support with an additional protocol and it would eliminate the need for most of the horrible in-dash infotainment systems car makers come up with.

  6. Glad my car uses Google instead by AaronW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm glad my car uses a combination of Google and Garmin for the GPS. On the main screen (Tesla Model S) it shows a satellite view of the map, with pinch-zoom and rotation support via the touch screen whereas next to the speedometer it shows a more traditional 3-D GPS view which I understand is supplied by Garmin (I could be wrong though). For voice recognition it uses Google's service. The next major update due out soon improves the time estimates in real-time using the live traffic information that is overlayed over the Google map. The main screen map caches data along the route (except satellite data) for when the 3G signal is lost and the other display relies entirely on in-car maps.

    My car also runs Linux for the main screen using the Qt toolkit for the UI. The only complaints I have heard are that the radio doesn't handle the proprietary Apple audio files but it handles MP3, Ogg and Flac just fine (with my USB drive formatted EXT4). Now if only Waze were integrated.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  7. Re:ukraine! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

    It will be if those tank drivers are using Apple Maps.

  8. This needs to be standardized by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At some point, automakers settled on a standard stereo plug for their cars, meaning you could install any aftermarket stereo into any car. The same thing needs to happen to car nav and entertainment systems. A standard plug should allow access to the car's GPS antenna, radio antennas, power, speakers, climate control, rear back-up camera, etc. Then you can plug in whatever you want to control these functions, be it an iPad, an Android tablet, a Garmin tablet, or some new doohickey which hasn't been invented yet. For bonus points they can have the car transmit various sensor readings through the plug, allowing the device to display things like fuel consumption, engine maintenance logs, hybrid battery charge state, etc.