Slashdot Mirror


Invention Makes Citibikes Electric

An anonymous reader writes "Inventor Jeff Guida has come up with a way to turn any Citibike into an electric scooter. His ShareRoller is about the size of a small briefcase, weighs just seven pounds, and has a 12- to 20-mile range. From the article: '"Years ago, I would've needed a giant engineering company and several million dollars in development research and it still would've taken two years or more," Guida said. But 3D printing has changed all that. In the coming months, Guida hopes to design a universal bracket so that the ShareRoller can be used on any bike. He has some competition there, as there are a few companies that make wheels that convert regular bikes into electric bikes, but he says the ShareRoller is more convenient.'"

166 comments

  1. What is wrong with pedals? by characterZer0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, right. They are too cheap and reliable. We need big business to be able to make money on bicycles, otherwise they are just toys.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    1. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. You hit the nail on the head. The problem with pedaling 20 miles in the hot sun is that the pedals are too reliable.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Or, I don't feel like showing up for work smelling like a locker room. Cheap people or people who don't have money can always take the pedal option. It's not always about trying to 'stick it to the man', my friend. Choice, and change, is a good thing. Embrace it.

    3. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, I don't feel like showing up for work smelling like a locker room. Cheap people or people who don't have money can always take the pedal option. It's not always about trying to 'stick it to the man', my friend. Choice, and change, is a good thing. Embrace it.

      It's called a "shower".

    4. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Say that to your Grandma, son.

    5. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 0

      Yes, but on the other hand, some people may not want to go into a business meeting sporting pit stains. This (hilariously expensive) item fills a little niche, People with disposable income, and guilt about driving cars, but to fat and lazy to actually ride a bike enough to be in good enough shape to travel 20 miles without breaking a sweat. I'm sure he'll sell a million units.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    6. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      Because all office buildings offer free showers at the door in case you biked there. Oh wait.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    7. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not seeing the big picture here, are we?

    8. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, I don't feel like showing up for work smelling like a locker room. Cheap people or people who don't have money can always take the pedal option. It's not always about trying to 'stick it to the man', my friend. Choice, and change, is a good thing. Embrace it.

      It's called a "shower".

      You must be from Europe. Offices with showers are uncommon in America.

    9. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going 20 miles is not an intended or even sane use case for Citibike.

    10. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Showers are everywhere in Europe, and people use them once a week.

    11. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if what you said is good or bad. ..

    12. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are *definitely* European.

    13. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pedaling gets you sweaty (not ideal depending on destination), and often the pants can get dirty from the chain (many chain guards are afterthoughts and shitty build/condition). And often the person is out of shape and won't get there fast enough or can't do it without assist in case of hills.

      Hey, I'm just glad if a car can be taken out the equation. But for the money, ypsomeone can buy a faster 1000 watt folding electric scooter with similiar range, or for a some hundred $$$ more a 1500 watt version,mthat should be compatible with mass transit.

      The device in this story looks like it will kill bike tires prematurely.

    14. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      You''re a fucking pussy if you think that's actually difficult.

      Hey you Anonymous Coward, you ever ridden a bike 20 miles in somewhere like San Francisco? Or is your sum total experience on a stationary bike in your mom's basement...?

    15. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Ichijo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't have a shower at work or a nearby gym, you can take what bicycle commuters call a "bird bath." Shower in the morning before you leave for work so your sweat won't smell (much). When you get to work, wait until you stop sweating, then find an empty bathroom stall and wipe the sweat off with Rocket Shower, unscented baby wipes, or a wet rag with a little soap. Then put on some fresh deodorant and a change of clothes and do your hair.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    16. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I frequently do 30-50 miles in the dead of summer in Phoenix. The temperature is literally 110 degrees fahrenheit during those times. It really isn't as bad as it sounds, when you're cycling you've got the wind to keep you cool.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    17. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You''re a fucking pussy if you think that's actually difficult.

      Hey you Anonymous Coward, you ever ridden a bike 20 miles in somewhere like San Francisco? Or is your sum total experience on a stationary bike in your mom's basement...?

      Nah, not twenty. How about a hundred and twenty?

    18. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to post this AC, but what exactly is wrong with just sitting there and drying off naturally? How sweaty do you fuckers get, for god's sake? And WTF do you mean, "do your hair"?? Are you a fucking model or something? Actually no, scratch that, if you were a model you'd have someone to do your hair for you.

      Really guys, we work for the most part in technology. If you really care, spray some deodorant under your arms and get the fuck over being a bit sweaty for ten minutes in the morning.

    19. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must be a fucking joy to work with. Actually you sound like the guy I fired because no-one could stand to be around you. You probably have no idea just how bad you smell.

    20. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Grandma won't be out riding a bike. She'll be in a car if she actually has to go anywhere, otherwise she'll be at home doing whatever like most retirees.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    21. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, it sounds pretty bad. With a body temp of 98, in a 110 degree environment, you can't radiate heat without sweating. I don't doubt that you can pull it off, but it wouldn't be pleasant. You'd need to be well acclimatized and fit to even make it manageable.

    22. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since many people are lazy and a bit afraid of the exercise required to bike to their work these solutions are good. One can start biking with it and have somewhat of a physical condition once the thing inevetably breaks or the battery dies. Then the user can continue biking without it.

    23. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you fire him because he smelled? Or because of his attitude? If the former, I hope some sort of warning was given to him.

    24. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Christian+Smith · · Score: 2

      I frequently do 30-50 miles in the dead of summer in Phoenix. The temperature is literally 110 degrees fahrenheit during those times. It really isn't as bad as it sounds, when you're cycling you've got the wind to keep you cool.

      Isn't somewhere like Phoenix as flat as a pancake? I'd take heat over hills any day.

    25. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. You hit the nail on the head. The problem with pedaling 20 miles in the hot sun is that the pedals are too reliable.

      You're a fucking pussy if you think that's actually difficult.

      And you're a fucking idiot if you think it's not for the average lard-ass who hasn't exercised in years.

      Look around you. Most people would concern me if they ran 20 feet, much less pedaled 20 miles.

    26. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to post this AC, but what exactly is wrong with just sitting there and drying off naturally? How sweaty do you fuckers get, for god's sake? And WTF do you mean, "do your hair"?? Are you a fucking model or something?

      Uh no, but some of us actually use our head. You know, like when we wisely wear a fucking helmet when riding.

      Unless you're sporting the Bruce Willis, helmets tend to fuck up any hair style.

    27. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe some office buildings do not have showers, but the vast majority does, precisely for this reason.

    28. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A helmet for a daily bike commute? That's a bit extreme...

    29. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by DaMattster · · Score: 2

      If more people pedaled twenty miles or so on a regular basis, we might actually have fewer healthcare costs - OMG, imagine that! We might be able to shrink the size of all of the industries that make bank off of our sedentary life styles yet still lay people off. Nothing like a healthier America to punish big business for being too greedy. It's the best kind of industry regulation - one that requires no government intervention.

    30. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't use a bike for commuting unless I had shower facilities. That much said, you can always carve out time during the week for a good, decent ride simply for activity.

    31. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandma won't be out riding a bike. She'll be in a car if she actually has to go anywhere, otherwise she'll be at home doing whatever like most retirees.

      Spoken like a true Dutch... oh wait!

    32. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only issue with your statement is the word "might."

    33. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Well yeah- she isn't very reliable at pedaling.

    34. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Where do you live?

    35. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "If more people pedaled twenty miles or so on a regular basis, we might actually have fewer healthcare costs - OMG, imagine that! "

      It takes a very small mind not to be able to differntiate between excercising and commuting.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    36. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by malakai · · Score: 1

      Roll your taxi savings into a gym membership nearby your work. End at the gym, shower and change there. Bonus for lifting. You do lift, right bro?

    37. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only is Phoenix really flat, it has a humidity level of about 10%.

      25.5 miles Sept 9th in Atlanta Georgia 92 degrees F with plenty of hills and 17.2 miles an hour average over the entire 25.5 miles... http://connect.garmin.com/activity/220865596

      16.3 miles January 4th in Atlanta Georgia at 24 degrees F, 8 degrees below freezing, not that many hills but in ice and snow average moving speed 13.8 mph http://connect.garmin.com/activity/424531098

      5.3 miles from work Kennesaw Georgia, July 27 in the evening at about 96 degrees with a moving average 20.5 miles an hour. http://connect.garmin.com/activity/203719419

      If you do it enough, bicycling is easy.

    38. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's possible, but Americans aren't the sort of people to go through those issues. They just get a car or take public transit. Literally, Americans would rather spend thousands of dollars a year avoiding wiping themselves down "like a bum" each day. Never underestimate the American need to avoid feeling like one of the lower class.

    39. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Giving people warnings with the real reason for the problem apparently opens up too much liability. Better to fire them with the vague excuse that they "weren't a good fit," or even lay them off, so that they don't have any ammo for a lawsuit. Not only does the former employee have no recourse, he doesn't even know what to do differently at his next job -- it's the perfect passive-aggressive "fuck you" for the modern manager to use!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    40. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And dry too - so you don't show up to work a sweaty mess.

    41. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hygiene is not something employers are responsible to teach... Get a life.

    42. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd say the vast majority do not have showers. Most places I've worked in the LA area don't.

      That said, here's a few other ideas:

      1. Check the local area for small health clubs or other venues of exercise. There's a rock-climbing place near where I used to work and I used to pay them $5 a month to use their showers. They were about half-a-mile from the office, so after showering and changing, I'd hop back on my bike and ride in to work.

      2. Where I work now, that wasn't an option. So in the office, I have two sponges, face-cloth and hand-towel, soap, coat-hanger, and a large cup. I ride in with clean clothes in my backpack. When I get to the office, I grab my stuff and go into the bathroom. I soap up one sponge and clean myself up--wash under the arms, etc. I take the other wet sponge and wash off the soap. Pour water in my hair, towel everything off, maybe throw on some body-spray. I throw my sweaty bike shirt in the sink and wash it, wring it out, and stick it on the coat hanger. Same with the bike shorts. I change clothes and come in with the wet clothes, which I hang up behind a server to dry them out.

      3. Speak with an outrageous French accent and everyone will think the smell is normal. (Sorry French people, couldn't resist...)

    43. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Well, I can get pretty sweaty. Fortunately, my sweat doesn't stink, nor does my shit, and my farts smell like flowers.

      Of course, no one in the office seems to agree with this statement. They obviously have some olfactory issues...

    44. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Depends on where/how you're riding.

      Hell, I wear a helmet when I get on a bicycle. Period. Because I'm always riding on roads and bad things can happen when sharing the road with a car.

    45. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      So as well as exercising on the bike, we have to lift weights as well?

      If you've got a guy membership, there's no need to sweat whilst commuting - use electric, as you're already exercising at the gym.

    46. Re:What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then indeed it makes some sense, but why ride on the road in the first place? Beke trails and lanes exist for a reason. Riding on the road just annoys motorists for no good reason.

    47. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by astar · · Score: 1

      In my state you have to pedal your bike even if it is otherwise fully powered. So it is not fully powered. The trick here may well be a way for the manufacturer to avoid the legal restrictions.

      i of course did not RTFA but a nice electric is 3500$ and that one i just looked at is worse than backordered. Hmm. Faraday bike?

      The lesson here is that almost all of us, me especially, should shut the fuck up most all the time. But you also especially because you are a snarky ass. See what i just did there?

    48. Re: What is wrong with pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poster #46386381 here.
      This might be worth a read.
      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/my-boss-says-i-smell-bad/

  2. Destroys the tires by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember these designs. They absolutely stripped the tread off the rear wheels within a few hundred miles of using them, and kept the local bike shops in serious business replacing wheels. Not tires: the wheels.

    1. Re:Destroys the tires by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Merlin. Is that you?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:Destroys the tires by classiclantern · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The genius of this guy's design is not the gadget but using it on Citibikes. He doesn't care if it ruins the tire. It's not his bike.

      --
      Now that I said that, I fell better.
    3. Re:Destroys the tires by MancunianMaskMan · · Score: 1
      I went around on a Velosolex some time in the late eighties, some people thought they were cool and retro then, and you could by them new. Horribly dangerous to ride on anything but a straight line or VERY SLOWLY.
      • Weight distribution all wrong
      • Front wheel drive unforgiving
      • Front tyre adapted for roller but not good on the road

      This was a petrol engine but I can't imagine that electrics now win out on power/weight either, at least not with a useful range.

  3. Oh dear, roller drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I hope they have ironed out all the flaws that plagued roller drive systems in the past. Like heavy tyre wear, heavy roller wear, only certain tread profiles working with the roller, the drive slippage in the wet and the inefficient power transfer.............

  4. the last thing Americans need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The US is one of the top few countries with the most overweight populations in the whole world. It's got massive levels of obesity, and health problems coming from weight and lack of exercise. It has a childhood obesity epidemic along with associated problems like diabetes.

    The very LAST thing it needs is one more way to take an enjoyable, healthy form of exercise and.... give people a way to avoid the exercise part.

    1. Re:the last thing Americans need... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I don't know about anyone else here, but I know that's how I always introduce myself.

      Hello. How do you do? I'm Americans!

      A) You watch too much Dr. Oz. While there are plenty of overweight Americans, there are also plenty of healthy ones.
      B) A doesn't really matter, since this is about commuting, not excercise/playing.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:the last thing Americans need... by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those that works every day to burn off the extra pounds. Have been working all week to amass a 3500 calorie deficit to lose a pound. Nope, hasn't happened. May happen Wednesday, as the gym is going to be closed tomorrow because there's 6" - 10" of snow coming tomorrow, and this is Virginia. I'm 66, and aerobically pretty good but not muscle-wise, so using my arms to burn that much energy is a non-starter. And... its bloody difficult just to end up with only eating my metabolism every day, now around 1800 calories.

      And at any rate, 20 miles to work is impossible for several reasons. #1 is I'm retired, but even if I wasn't, the roads around here are like suicide to be out on with anything that doesn't weigh 2000#+. A bike is going to be a sudden object just over a hill crest or around a turn that drivers talking on cell phones or texting may or may not see in time. If you're brave enough to ride the roads around here, you're brave enough to take a job in one of our several war zones, where the pay is really good and you probably have to ride a bike anyway unless you are military and can get issued a Humvee to use. Afghanistan for the time being, and I understand we're in Africa really hush-hush right now, too. Yeah, you might get shot at, but its still not as dangerous as riding the roads around here on a bike.

      Today is a fail... I was just to the grocery, and bought a bag of fat pills (peanuts.) Will have to make up some ground on losing that pound on Tuesday and Wednesday.

    3. Re:the last thing Americans need... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Exercise has numerous health benefits, but if your primary goal is weight loss it's not terribly effective, an hour of strenuous exercise will only burn maybe 500 calories or so, and probably leave you hungry. Meanwhile reducing your portion size by 20-25% will do the exact same thing, and after a week or so your stomach will have shrunk so that you feel just as full. There's also lots of tricks you can employ to help things along - use smaller plates and flatware, it tricks your brain into thinking you're eating more food. And eat more slowly - there's a 15+minute lag in your body's "I'm full" signal - if you eat until you feel full then you've spent the last 15 minutes overdoing it.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:the last thing Americans need... by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      And that man's name was Eli Whitney.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    5. Re:the last thing Americans need... by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      So, you assume biking is only for exercise?
      No wonder using a bike is so dangerous on the street.

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    6. Re:the last thing Americans need... by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      An hour of exercise is 1000 calories, indicated by the ergometer and confirmed by my spreadsheets. Eating much less than I do has only been successful with NitriSystem. I could do that, if there's absolutely no other way, but I'm going to try this for a while. Today was 1750 calories, 50 less than my calculated "burn". Adding 238 calories today, due to an exercise fail (ran out of energy, shoulda eaten _before_ going to the gym, but the whole day was screwed up because we had 7" of snow and you'd think, from the reaction around here, that the glaciers had returned. Movies closed, restaurants closed, gym closed at 8, poker venue even canceled. Geeezzz... so I go trotting into the gym with not enough energy, and was "all in" in about 14 minutes. Tomorrow will be better. I am approaching being able to do the whole 1000 calories in one "go", again. Last time was last May, but I got hurt, sick, hurt, sick, and sick which interrupted my exercise. Turned out I had a vitamin D deficiency. Now that that is cured, I'm trying to get back to my former fitness level. Last may, I even went for 1600 calories in one day. 1000 straight-thru, then 3 200-calorie sets. That makes a difference. But I'm far more adept at exercising at a high level than I am at restricting my eating, that ALWAYS fails. When the ice and snow goes away, there will also be biking and attacking my weeds out back, some of which are up to 3/4" diameter. I _will_ get the back of that lot cleared...

    7. Re:the last thing Americans need... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That seems unlikely. I'm no biologist, but I do know 1000 food calories = 1 million real calories, divide by 3600 seconds in an hour gives you 278 calories/second, or 7.18 horsepower. Even with biological inefficiencies that's a *lot* of power for one person to consume continuously for an hour.

      Okay, so a little more research and it looks like it is possible, but you need to be doing something *seriously* intense.

      Hey, can't fault you with playing to your strengths. Myself I find exercising regularly difficult to maintain, I'm doing good if I manage to a few minutes worth of strength training scattered through the day. A couple more tricks I found on the diet side that were quite helpful: Fiber is your friend - the calories are mostly not accessible to our biology, so they don't count. Oatmeal, 100% whole grain bread, etc. (What can I say, I'm a carb addict. I can at least reduce the impact...), and obviously cut out as much sugar as possible - it was a little rough moving to fresh fruit for sweetening my cereal and such, but now that I've acclimated I usually find those oh-so-appealing candy bars cloyingly sweet. I still indulge from time to time, but I often find myself putting half away for later. Victory!

      And do try the small flatware/small bites, I was astounded at the difference it makes. Modern flatware has gotten huge, especially the dessert pieces. I use the dessert pieces from a set I inherited from my grandparents. Only thing I've found new in the same size range is stuff intended for feeding babies, but some of it's not too ridiculous.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:the last thing Americans need... by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      I don't know how, but I know your math is off. The exercise machine I use says I'm most often in the 200 watt area of output. There's 745.699 watts per horsepower, so I most often put out a little over a quarter horsepower. The machine says that is 1000 "food calories" after about an hour. Somewhere there's a fail in the conversions.

      Yeah, exercise daily is tough until you build up aerobic fitness, so doing the elliptical for an hour and 1000 calories becomes as easy as walking for that much time. I really do get strong enough to do that if I keep at it, and was like that last May. But it takes months of regular exercise on the elliptical to do that. And I can't do that _every_ day, but 4 days a week happened a lot. 4000 calories, if I can manage not to eat more than my 1800 calorie metabolism, will lose me a pound. If its nice out, I can add maybe 200 calories an hour for several hours outdoors, doing "stuff" like attacking my weeds, pruning trees (I do NOT climb... I have this piece of chansaw chain with a rope on each end, throw it up in the tree, pull on the ropes back and forth, and down comes the unwanted limb...) , fixing things that need it.

    9. Re:the last thing Americans need... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Nope. 200W = 48 calories/second = 173,000 calories per hour, or 173 food calories. That's straight out of an engineering calculator. *If* that actually translates to burning 1000 food calories the only explanation it that our bodies are only about 17% efficient, which honestly sounds pretty impressive - as a rule biology is actually horribly inefficient (The single biggest argument I can think of against intelligent design is that *I* can think of several obvious improvements. Which would suggest that the designer was pretty incompetent.)

      It's not the exertion of exercise that dissuades me, it's the tedium. Why the ^%$#@! would I want to waste that much of my life doing something so utterly pointless and monotonous? Nothing I actually care about doing requires that level of physical fitness - I don't need to earn my living by the sweat of my brow, and I can hike all day with 30lbs on my back without much strain, which covers all the equipment and supplies I need for a comfy week in the woods, plus extra cargo space for any cool rocks I find. My only reason for exercising beyond the few minutes a day needed for the strength and basic body sculpting to enhance more... domestic recreation, would be to burn calories. And it's far easier and less wasteful of both time and food to simply not consume them in the first place. It's not like the pleasure of eating is tied to the quantity consumed - a half-teaspoon bite of ice cream takes no less time to savor and swallow than a heaping tablespoon, and tastes exactly the same.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  5. Wheel reinvented. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sinclair Zeta from 2004:
    http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g8koe/c5martin/zeta.htm

    1. Re:Wheel reinvented. by gnoshi · · Score: 1

      Good find. The Zeta actually looks like it would probably damage the wheel and tyre less too, because of the longer contact area.

    2. Re:Wheel reinvented. by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      And that's basically an electric version of the Solex from 1941.

  6. What a bunch of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Is there a citation somewhere for this mythical multi-million dollar two year scooter conversion kit? Or this just another way to totally blow 3D printing out of proportion to what it can actually do?

    Look, years ago I saw some guy cobbled together a chainsaw motor to friction-drive the rear wheel of a pedal bicycle. No giant, multi-million dollar two year project there, and no 3D printers either.

    This incessant trumpeting of 3D printing as some kind of revolution is tiresome.

    1. Re:What a bunch of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't own a chainsaw, and if I did I wouldn't want to destroy it for a bike project. I don't have a couple of days to fart around custom fabricating something that will attach to my bike. I just want to buy something relatively inexpensive that works. I don't really care if you 3D print it, or expertly extrude it from your anus.

    2. Re:What a bunch of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The point is no one needed 3D printing for something so fucking obvious and simple it was made a hundred years ago. And it certainly never took two years and millions of dollars either. I'm just tired of the continuous cock-gobbling jizz-splash every. single. fucking. time. someone made something and then claims how radically faster and better everything is because of a 3D printer. And there's never any evidence for this except that we have to take someone's word that the human race was completely and utterly incapable of putting a fucking rubber wheel on the end of a shaft before.

      Chainsaws are cheap. The other day I walked behind a warehouse and there was an electric one jammed blade-deep into an iced-over snowbank.

    3. Re:What a bunch of BS by Animats · · Score: 1

      The point is no one needed 3D printing for something so fucking obvious and simple it was made a hundred years ago.

      Right. The parts should be banged out on an injection moulding machine. Even the little injection moulder at TechShop could make those parts at the rate of about one a minute. Production machines are far faster. You'd have to cut aluminum dies first, which takes hours on a CNC mill, but then you can bang out thousands of parts.

      Really, though, you're paying for the battery. Batteries for electric bikes costs $500 to $2000.

    4. Re:What a bunch of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even better. I saw something more radical than a roller drive and it obviously was cobbled together by someone, without millions of dollars or years of work.

      Check it out

      So replace the gas motor with a brushless motor and a non-exploding battery, preferably away from the crotchal area.

    5. Re:What a bunch of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except isn't this for once the actual situation 3D printing is good for, and could be championed for unlike a lot of other claims? If you are actually trying to make a product to cell, you don't want something just cobbled together from used junk sitting around. You're going to go through several revisions unless you are really good, lucky, or trusting of computer design. Whether it is because you want to work on the aesthetics, performance, projected production costs, etc., you'll go through several iterations. You're not going to get injection molds made for prototypes, you're going to get custom one-offs made. I've been both in the position of sending them off, which is costly and/or involves long delays, or machining them myself in house. CNC machining can sink a lot of time for one-offs for both software setup, and hardware setup. If you are working with the right materials and need to rapidly make new prototypes for development, that is actually something 3D printing is good for and revolutionizes... which might be why it was originally called rapid prototyping.

    6. Re:What a bunch of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were that obvious, there wouldn't be a need to lie and exaggerate about how much it cost and how long it took back in the bad old pre-3D days. Come on, be serious.

    7. Re:What a bunch of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you have an actual company with a couple people on staff, but you send your prototypes out to be made by an external shop with a week or more lead time, and 3-4 digit prices for a single part, or 5 digit price for a pile of distinct parts, costs and time add up pretty quick... It does get easier if you are making several things at the same time though and can keep all stuff internal and busy most of the time. But a startup starting by making a single physical product can blow through money quick even without wasting money on fancy offices and luxury.

    8. Re:What a bunch of BS by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The point is no one needed 3D printing

      Wow +5 insightful! No one needed 3D printing! Amazing! Somehow the human race survived up to almost now without 3D printing but we need a slashdot nay-sayer to tell us that no-one needed it. Amazing!

      Chainsaws are cheap. The other day I walked behind a warehouse and there was an electric one jammed blade-deep into an iced-over snowbank.

      Ah yes, why didn't I think of that. I should hop on my trusty old British Eagle Mission, fire up my chainsaw, lean over and attack the front wheel to get me moving. That'll work and it's CHEAP! because chainsaws are cheap?

      Out of interest how often does one have to sharpen the chain in this system?

      Sarcasm aside: 3D printing is bloody fantastic. Yes, you can make stuff without it. I'm skilled enough to make basic shapes on a lathe and mill and know enough not to make an idiot of myself and seek expert advice when it's beyond my skill level. I have had stuff CNC cut and blah blah blah.

      Getting something CNC cut is a big load of work. It is seriously not easy for complex shapes even figuring out how to clamp the bloody thing (actually that's probably 90% of it really).

      End point, 3D printing, even on a "crappy" single head extrusion printer is great. You can do plastic 1-offs. You can make positives or negatives for casting and moulding. You can prototype a new part in the time it would take to set up the mill.

      And they are really, REALLY cheap and require far less skill to operate than the equivalent machines.

      Don't get me wrong. I love machining. A day on the mill of one of the most rewarding, relaxing experiences I know, just watching the finished part I designed slowly emerge from the intert chunk of rough cut metal as I operate the machine.

      But when it comes to democratising manugacturing and prototyping, 3D printers are a real game changer. Mostly, I 3D print stuff now.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:What a bunch of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3D printers are a real game changer.

      Except they aren't doing that. That was the OP's complaint basis. 3D printing is 99% hype. Large manufacturers can still beat the snot out of any smaller maker by using economies of scale applied to 3DPs. 3DPs still require a significant knowledge base, just like using CNC, a manual mill, or whatever "game changing" piece of garage manufacturing apparatus.

      3D printers are just more tools. They have uses, but can't be used everywhere. Why can't we just admit that? If you're running a small biz and you are a maker, then I expect you to evaluate a 3DP. But I don't expect you to find it will revolutionize your business as a standard issue. No one tool EVER makes a small biz function... because if it does, then competitors will wipe you out, and then a large biz will wipe THEM out, using their ever-present economy of scale.

    10. Re:What a bunch of BS by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      3D printing is a fad. Just like virtual reality was in the 1990s. In both cases, they are useful for niche creative uses in prototyping and visualisation. Neither is the transformative technology for ordinary people some make it out to be.

  7. Pricey by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    For over a grand it seems like you could get a second hand scooter or something.

    1. Re:Pricey by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      You can't carry a scooter with you into the office, you have to find a place to park it/store it. The Citibike is a rental bike you drop off when you get to your end point and you take this off and carry it with you. Yes it costs almost as much as a scooter but provides more convenience than one for a crowded city with limited parking space.

    2. Re:Pricey by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      $995 will buy a lot of cab rides.

    3. Re:Pricey by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      $995 will buy a lot of cab rides.

      It won't buy that many. Last time I took a cab home from the airport, it was about $50. That would only be about 20 trips.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:Pricey by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      So you'd ride a CitiBike home from the airport?

    5. Re:Pricey by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      You can't carry a scooter with you into the office, you have to find a place to park it/store it.

      Where I live, you can park a scooter of up to 50cc in any bike rack, and there's a bike rack at my office. Hell, you can even park it legally on the sidewalk as long as it doesn't obstruct pedestrian traffic.

      The Citibike is a rental bike you drop off when you get to your end point and you take this off and carry it with you.

      We also have a system like Citibike, and it's a pain in the ass. If the drop-off rack is full, you have to go find another one. If the pick-up rack is empty, you have to find another one. Not so convenient.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  8. Only 12 to 20 miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatsamatter, fattie, can't pedal for more than 5 minutes without having a coronary?

    1. Re:Only 12 to 20 miles? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Yeah pretty much. Also, being fat makes the bike way to top heavy, and I fall over a lot.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    2. Re:Only 12 to 20 miles? by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Yep, I have a bike and 8 miles is about it. I'm too fat and not quite up to much more than 8 miles. I also have a condition in my left hip, where statin drugs attempted to devour all the muscles in the left side of my body a few years ago, and that hip gets tired waaaay early, and is uncomfortable. It yells, "I'm tired... I'm tired.... I'm tired" in my brain even walking around a food store sometimes, and I have to take it easy. There's LOTS of people with some weirdity that keeps them from performing athletics like bike riding. BTW, if you can avoid taking statin drugs, do so, as the are ing dangerous.

  9. But, it is illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NYC has decided that electric bikes, an overall great idea, are illegal, as they are sorta "motor vehicles", and as such, don't comply with motorcycle regulations (lights, signals, VIN numbers, etc). A great idea, an interesting invention, but will get you a bitch list of tickets in NYC.

    1. Re:But, it is illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have motors, and they are vehicles. They fit the literal description of a 'motor vehicle'.

    2. Re:But, it is illegal by sed+quid+in+infernos · · Score: 1

      That's why the article says this: "For legal reasons, the ShareRoller won't engage when you're at a standstill, so I had to pedal a couple of times before I could engage the 1.0 horsepower motor with a handlebar-mounted throttle."

      The law banning electric bikes does not apply unless the motor "is capable of propelling the device without human power." Here, it's not (although it doesn't sound like it needs much human power).

      That still doesn't mean this is legal to use. It's possible the Citibike agreement bans (or will ban) their use. Probably won't result in a fine, but it could result in a ban. And money damages if the device does cause excess tire wear. But the general NYC ban on electric bicycles doesn't apply.

    3. Re:But, it is illegal by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      NYC [treats] electric bikes [as] illegal [... No] (lights, signals, VIN numbers, etc).

      But this box DOES have lights, as the ilustration clearly shows. Looks like it has signals, too, though that's not clear. (There are rear-facing lights, too.)

      As another has already pointed out, it's designed so you have to start up manually before the motor will cut in, to make it escape the definition of a motor vehicle.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:But, it is illegal by hankwang · · Score: 1

      But this box DOES have lights, as the ilustration clearly shows.

      I hope the inventor knows what he is doing regarding the lights. Designing headlights such that they are usable and at the same time don't dazzle oncoming traffic is not entirely trivial.

    5. Re:But, it is illegal by Slugster · · Score: 1

      NYC has decided that electric bikes, an overall great idea, are illegal, as they are sorta "motor vehicles", and as such, don't comply with motorcycle regulations ...

      This is really the 'problem' with motorized bicycles in the USA. There is no unified legislative support to allow them. Each state has its own rules.

      Some states do allow both electric and gasoline-powered bicycles, with various restrictions and requirements. A few allow registering them as mopeds, plates and all. Other states don't allow them in any form.

      Some states only allow electrics, and while that seems like an okay deal it isn't... It's like saying "you can own a car but it has to be all-electric",,, and what does that mean? Way higher cost and way less range than a comparable-powered gasoline option would be, despite all the Consumer Reports praise for the Tesla.

      Also I tend to suspect that there are two invisible issues:
      US cities really don't want to have to deal with all the problems that a huge increase in cyclists would cause. Also-
      The US economy is inflationary and so the government isn't interested in anything getting cheaper than before. You trading your car for a motorized bicycle would be a savings of thousands of dollars a year for you--but for govt bureaucrats, it would be a loss of thousands of dollars spent into the economy each year. Why would they ever want that to happen?

    6. Re:But, it is illegal by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Some states only allow electrics, and while that seems like an okay deal it isn't... It's like saying "you can own a car but it has to be all-electric",,, and what does that mean? Way higher cost and way less range than a comparable-powered gasoline option would be, despite all the Consumer Reports praise for the Tesla.

      They say that because they (rightly) care about emissions and noise pollution. These days even chainsaws have to have a catalyst in some states. Places where we care about the air, like California. A motor vehicle has to have a notably more effective one, because presumably it will be run for more hours in more cases. (If you're running a chainsaw for a lot of hours, you probably have a good reason, and you're permitted some emissions.)

      I would really like to be able to do more of my trips on a bicycle, but I live in a place where sun exposure can harm you and which regularly gets very hot. Even if I had a power assist I wouldn't bicycle. And in traffic in a city, I prefer to have a cage around me; it has been shown to be far safer than bicycling. That's because of the cars, you say. True enough. Let's start to phase them out. Self-driving taxis are the first phase, then let's make them bimodal road/rail vehicles and replace all the carpool lanes with PRT track. That will sell people on bimodal vehicles (they'll have to have track support to ride the modern carpool equivalent, which will actually be useful because it will whisk along at speed instead of getting clogged up with some asshole in an Audi or some Mexicans on their way to or from the border — that sounds racist as fuck on both ends, but from my experience using the carpool lane through LA, that's what you're going to be held up by over there. Besides, you can get away with apparent racism if it's self-effacing, right? Anyway, it's a cultural thing, not racial. You might as well just pass on the right when you get a chance, because they're not pulling over for you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. inflated expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But 3D printing has changed all that.

    Yep, 3D printing, were the per unit price is likely 10x more than other techniques and crappy in precision and limited in materials... unlike injection molding, vacforming, etc... Sure it may take 100K to setup a injection molding operation, but the cost exponentially goes down once producing starts, unlike 3D printing.

    1. Re:inflated expectations by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      So you start with 3D printing for your prototypes and small production runs, then if/when you get enough orders to justify it you get someone to make an injection mould.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:inflated expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether 3d printing or injection molding is cheaper depends fully on the quantity. There is a break even point
      Of course the real world is more complex. If you lower the price you'll sell more units. If you use an injection molding setup you assume that you'll sell more units, thus you can lower the price. If the price is lower you'll sell more units.
      However, with the legal issues surrounding this (CitiBike may decide to ban them, completely stopping sales) 3d printing is probably wiser. Banks may not be lining up to finance a 100K investment that may just become a banned product.
      Having said that, I don't think it would be wise to just ban them. Simply start renting electric bikes if that is what the people want. In that case the sale of this product is just free market research for CitiBike.

  11. Lotsa hate going on here by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some of the ideas put forth are old. Motor assist for pedal bicycles has been around practically since small gas engines were available. Electric assist is newer, but still not by much. Battery and solid state technology are making it much more capable than what we had even a few decades ago.

    What is interesting is combining all this into a unit which can be installed "in seconds". That opens its use up to some applications for which motor assist may not have made much sense in the past.

    Oh, and all the carping about 3D printing? Sure, its not economic for mass production. But it has its place for smaller shops who need too knock off a few prototypes quickly and cheaply. Once the design is finalized, more traditional fabrication techniques can be used.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Lotsa hate going on here by swb · · Score: 2

      But this is slashdot, where fault-finding and nit-picking are part of the bargain.

      You have to expect all the posts about how the design is bad, it costs too much, there are N other versions which are better, you can build your own for less money, it's bad for the environment, in {Europe, China, Brazil, ...} they do it differently, or there's just something inherently evil and antisocial about it.

    2. Re:Lotsa hate going on here by malakai · · Score: 1

      In NYC, a lot of the delivery guys ( well the Chinese guys ) have some sort of clockwork style bike mod on their delivery bikes. It mounts under the seat and attached to the drive train, and they must be storing energy into a spring or some other mechanical way, then they pop a button and you hear 'click click click' and the bike goes up the hill as they guy coasts on the pedals.

      I'm always leery of those contraptions. Just waiting for one to fail catastrophically and send metal gears into bystanders.

  12. Would be useful in bike shares by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    Cities are introducing bike share stands, where people rent bikes by the hour. A technology like this could broaden the appeal and market for them.

    If they make it compatible with bicycles that fold into a car trunk, it could reduce drunken driving. People who find themselves too drunk to drive could rent drivers to take them home. These drivers would arrive in a folding electric bike, fold their bike and put it in the trunk, take the sensible drunk home and return on the electrified bike. They could do it in a regular bike too, but with some electric assist more people would be interested.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Would be useful in bike shares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Not only didn;t you read TFA, but you didn't read the summary or title either. What do you think a Citibike is, genius?

    2. Re:Would be useful in bike shares by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      These drivers would arrive in a folding electric bike, fold their bike and put it in the trunk, take the sensible drunk home and return on the electrified bike.

      It's already being done... "Zingo"

      I agree with the other part. If it's $5 for a standard bike rental or $10 for the electric, if I'm going far enough the electric might make sense. Heck, going on a bike ride with an elder relative might be more realistic.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Would be useful in bike shares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've had that service here in Louisville, Kentucky for 10 years now, it's called Cityscoot. It costs a little more than a cab ride does, they show up on a scooter that folds up, put it in your trunk, and drive you home in your car, then ride the scooter back. They have sponsorship deals with some bars that make it even cheaper to use. For long distance trips, they have another car follow and pick up the driver.

      Why this hasn't spread to every city in the country by now is beyond me.

    4. Re:Would be useful in bike shares by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      I'd far rather arrive ON a folding eBike than in one... your sentence implies the bike has folded up on them... ;)

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    5. Re:Would be useful in bike shares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Netherlands we have OV-fiets. Prices: E3.15 ($4.34) a day for a normal bike, E 7.50 ($10.34) a day for an electric bike. The normal bikes are simple (no gears, single size that is a tad small for most Dutch (way small for me), functional lights, reverse pedal braking) but I have been able to do 36 km/h (22 mph) on it for 10 km with a strong wind in my back.
      So yeah, in a heavy biking country those prices are possible. Dunno about financial support by the government but they are available on most train stations. If I need to go somewhere non-standard I usually go there by train and rent a bike there.

    6. Re:Would be useful in bike shares by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Dunno, a folding velomobile may be possible (highly unlikely though).

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  13. useless in the wet, too by SuperBanana · · Score: 2

    Tire-drive systems are useless in the wet.

    If you're impling that shops are taking advantage of people and selling them a new entire wheel, that's way, way down the "low" scale. I don't know a bike shop around that would replace rear wheel instead of replacing the tube and tire, unless the person damaged the rim by riding on it for too long with a flat tire; if you chew up the edge of the rim, it'll slowly destroy the sidewall of the tire.

    Another reason rear wheel replacements can become necessary: most inexperienced cyclists brake exclusively with their rear brake, falsely believing that braking with the front brake will result in instant death/them being thrown from the bike. On bicycles with rim brakes, braking wears the edge of the rim, especially in places where it rains or snows (road sand etc.) Eventually the rim wears past the safety limit (on most modern wheels, there is a machined notch half-way on the brake track. If you can't feel it, your rim is too worn.) If you're the second or third owner and a bike is a decade old, having to replace a rim isn't unreasonable, as it's one of the wear components, just like the brake rotors on your car.

    If you've got a nice hub and spokes, you can have a shop just replace the rim. Labor can start to become a factor, although a hand-built wheel is usually better built than a lot of machine-built wheels (ie what they'll pull off the rack.)

    For example, if I were to destroy the rim on my bike (in a way that wouldn't have damaged the spokes), which has a generator hub to power the lights, and double-butted spokes...I would almost certainly just have the shop buy a new rim and re-lace everything to the new rim.

    1. Re:useless in the wet, too by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you're impling that shops are taking advantage of people and selling them a new entire wheel, that's way, way down the "low" scale. I don't know a bike shop around that would replace rear wheel instead of replacing the tube and tire, unless the person damaged the rim by riding on it for too long with a flat tire; if you chew up the edge of the rim, it'll slowly destroy the sidewall of the tire.

      Did you look at TFA? You didn't need to read it, just look at the pictures. It looked like a tire-friction device on the front wheel. It might be bad in the wet, but the standard tires on the bike in question look to be non-knobby, so it shouldn't tear up the knobs or such.

      Build your own rims. It's surprisingly easy. So long as you don't rush, you can't ever do any damage. You don't even need any special tools (other than spoke wrenches you should have laying around anyway). You use the bike as the truing stand.

    2. Re:useless in the wet, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, I'm implying that the point pressure on the wheel that is exerted by the small drive wheel of the old electric motors is much, much smaller than the normal contact area of the ground. The result is essentially that of very high pressure on a small area of the wheel, causing a constant flexing of the wheel at that spot as the wheel rotates. It fatigues the metal and it loosens spokes, which then deform the wheel even further in a positive feedback loop that *ruins* wheels. The problem isn't as badn on older, more robutst bicycle wheel designs. But on modern, lightweight, alloy designs, it as bad as sitting somebody fat on your rear pa nnier and riding around for a hundred miles. It ruins the wheel.

      Even if the wheel is not ruined, the destruction of tires by the old friction drives is profound and ongoing cost tat Citibike would have to absorb somehow, probably by raising rates or forbidding these electric drives.

    3. Re:useless in the wet, too by hankwang · · Score: 1

      Build your own rims. It's surprisingly easy.

      Does that include asymmetrically spoked rims (back wheel with derailleur gears)?

    4. Re:useless in the wet, too by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The front is smashed more than the rear, so I've rebuilt the fronts much more than the backs. But backs aren't really different. And the thing in the way on the back is the cassette, though you build it with that off, so just the freewheel is on. The dérailleur gears are cogs, usually only two, and they move to force the chain onto new gears on the cassette. God, I haven't had to name anatomy of a bike in 20 years.

    5. Re:useless in the wet, too by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      I used to work in a bicycle factory, and my job was the "Wheel maker" I even made wheels for the US Olympic team one year. Anyways, once you understand how they work, they are very easy to make. I don't even ride bikes so it always surprises my bike riding friends and neighbors when I rebuild and balance their wheels in seconds.

  14. 3d printing crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything I see could of been milled with a bridge port which can be bought used for 2k-4k....

  15. Seriously? by ukoda · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seriously am I the only person who has been to China? E-bikes are the most common form of transport in most cites in China and retail at about USD $400. His unit is $1200 and has less features that a $400 e-bike. Does no one do their homework anymore before launching a new product?

    1. Re:Seriously? by utrayd · · Score: 1

      It is OK Americans are suckers for novelty. But here is serious, as a tech who commutes on an china imported electric bike, front wheel drive for bikes in any sort of slippery conditions is dangerous because of the amount of acceleration from electric motors. Top speed of 20 miles per hour is OK but with standard brakes etc it is quite fast enough thanks. For the motorcyclists who think these electric bikes are as dangerous, this is not so. I have even personally found they are less dangerous than a standard bike as they are more able to join traffic with their excellent acceleration. I have ridden motorcycles, bikes and own a car which now rests at home. Costs per kilometer are very low, about 2c US taking into account changing the battery every five years. Still initial cost should be about $500 to make them viable.

    2. Re:Seriously? by hankwang · · Score: 1

      front wheel drive for bikes in any sort of slippery conditions is dangerous because of the amount of acceleration from electric motors.

      One would think that this problem solves itself because the motor uses friction with the front tire. Under slippery conditions, the motor has little traction as well.

    3. Re:Seriously? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      But 3D printed!

    4. Re:Seriously? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      400 dollar = 10Ah battery pack. I bet this guy's battery is twice that power or more.

    5. Re:Seriously? by ukoda · · Score: 1

      The batteries are the major part of BOM cost of a Chinese e-bikes. I can't tell you the actual capacity from memory but they are more than 10Ah. Most use 4 x large 12V SLA to give 48V to a 500W brushless rear motor. They are in two removal packs with handles so they can be carried into your home for charging. Practical range is about 20 to 30km and we have free power for staff in the office bike park. Also the the scooter style construction is far more practical, able to carry a respectable load on it flat deck and I have often seen them haul a family of four, oldest child standing on the deck, dad driving, mum at the back with the youngest in between the parents. Contrast that with this bicycle add on with similar performance but far less carrying capacity.

      My point is there probably 100M+ ebike in daily use that are a third of the price and more practical than this guy's add on. My question is why these ebikes are not used much in other countries and why overpriced bicycle solutions get press coverage?

    6. Re:Seriously? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      http://www.alibaba.com/countrysearch/CN/electric-bike.html

      Oh... lead acid would explain the lower cost. You can see from the above link that all of the chinese e-bikes using lithium ion cost 400 dollars for a 10Ah battery.

    7. Re:Seriously? by ukoda · · Score: 1

      Alibaba? That's for foreigners who want to pay too much! The locals use Taobao. Some listings are likely to be bogus but the $400 was the local street price, online there are some real cheap deals. The USD buys 6.13 RMB so you can see a bicycle form factor for under $200 at http://item.taobao.com/item.ht... or this more scooter style one starting from $85 http://item.taobao.com/item.ht... but there is probably a catch with that second one.

      My original post was referring to the more popular traditional scooter style that appear to listed for $200 to $360 typified by this on http://item.taobao.com/item.ht.... These things are everywhere and are a lot of fun to ride, just too slow for my taste.

      Can't afford a Tesla and don't want to wait for the cheaper model then this electric car can be yours for $1750 http://item.taobao.com/item.ht.... Note the fan on the dash, it includes air-con! Shame it is probably illegal in most countries. They are not common here as most people step from the e-bikes to a conventional car. Personally I drive the petrol BYD F0 which was so very cheap for a quality car and I have seen the BYD E6 which is a serious electric car that should make the Japanese manufactures nervous.

  16. Years ago... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    "Years ago, I would've needed a giant engineering company and several million dollars in development research and it still would've taken two years or more,"

    horseshit, its batteries in a box with a motor, everything that was made on that 3d printer could have been fabricated with hand tools and some metal flashing found at the hardware store, even with paint and the trip there and back, still would have taken less time to make.

    1. Re: Years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      QUIET YOU LUDDITE!!!! The human race was completely and utterly HELPLESS before Bre Pettis squoze some warm plastic through a nozzle attached to a stepper motor!!!

      You've been a bad boy and as a punishment you must 3D print a black horse's cock and stuff it up your bum all week.

    2. Re: Years ago... by malakai · · Score: 1

      I think the mechanism for having the motor lower onto the tire with the right pressure, and also store in a compact state is likely where all the 3d printing time went. Making sliding/folding/compacting devices like that, that don't seize because one of your angles is a fraction off, is not easy.

  17. I expected math literacy on Slashdot. Silly me. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Whatsamatter, fattie, can't pedal for more than 5 minutes without having a coronary?

    I expected more math literacy on Slashdot. Silly me.

    12 to 20 miles at a top speed of 16 MPH is an hour (+-25%).

    That's up and down the steep hills of San Francisco, of course, in all sorts of weather. Do you want to try it - twice a day, to and from work in rush hour traffic? (Didn't think so.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  18. Show a little support? by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It mentions 18 miles per hour in the article for the top speed, but I wonder if that's for 'not' or 'barely' pedaling. Can it take somebody with a max speed of 15mph pedaling on their own and get them up to 20 if they're really working at it?

    but to fat and lazy to actually ride a bike enough to be in good enough shape to travel 20 miles without breaking a sweat.

    Consider that there's a lot of work and sweat between 'fat&lazy' and 'slim&active'. Most people have limited choice about distance from work. A device that gets them started, to actually do it, can be of great assistance. I know there's a few hills where I would have liked this thing just for that spot. I'd still have to help it up, of course.

    What about the guy who needs to travel 30 miles, and this is the difference between him biking and driving?

    In other words, biking shouldn't be about exclusivity.

    Selling millions - Not if it can only fit on one bike type. Fix that and maybe.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Show a little support? by malakai · · Score: 2

      Selling millions - Not if it can only fit on one bike type. Fix that and maybe.

      It works on many bike types ( not just rentable citi-bike with the triangle dock)

  19. That's about right given the price point. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yep, 3D printing, were the per unit price is likely 10x more than other techniques ...

    That goes well with the one-grand-plus pricetag for a device that should be selling for a couple hundred bux or less in mass production.

    If this catches on I expect to see an injection-molded version closer to the price I mentioned. Either this guy will go to that as he ramps up or the Chinese/Koreans/whatever will have a knockoff out in a few months after it catches on.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  20. Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by miracle69 · · Score: 2

    It's a stupid law, but a law none-the-less.

        19-176.2. Motorized scooters. a. For purposes of this section, the
        term "motorized scooter" shall mean any wheeled device that has
        handlebars that is designed to be stood or sat upon by the operator, is
        powered by an electric motor or by a gasoline motor that is capable of
        propelling the device without human power and is not capable of being
        registered with the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. For the
        purposes of this section, the term motorized scooter shall not include
        wheelchairs or other mobility aids designed for use by disabled persons.
            b. No person shall operate a motorized scooter in the city of New
        York.
            c. Any person who violates subdivision b of this section shall be
        liable for a civil penalty in the amount of five hundred dollars.
        Authorized employees of the police department and department of parks
        and recreation shall have the authority to enforce the provisions of
        this section. Such penalties shall be recovered in a civil action or in
        a proceeding commenced by the service of a notice of violation that
        shall be returnable before the environmental control board. In addition,
        such violation shall be a traffic infraction and shall be punishable in
        accordance with section eighteen hundred of the New York state vehicle
        and traffic law.
            d. Any motorized scooter that has been used or is being used in
        violation of the provisions of this section may be impounded and shall
        not be released until any and all removal charges and storage fees and
        the applicable fines and civil penalties have been paid or a bond has
        been posted in an amount satisfactory to the commissioner of the agency
        that impounded such vehicle.

    http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/LAWSSEAF.cgi?QUERYTYPE=LAWS+&QUERYDATA=$$ADC19-176.2$$@TXADC019-176.2+&LIST=SEA2+&BROWSER=BROWSER+&TOKEN=35384350+&TARGET=VIEW

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  21. NYC legal electric motorcycle? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Here, it's not (although it doesn't sound like it needs much human power).

    Yeah. The startup thing aside, after reading the NYC law I wonder how it'd handle an electric bicycle that uses some sort of strain sensor to decide how much 'assist' to give the rider. IE you could set it to 100% and it'd try to match the power the user is putting into the bike, 200% would be if you're old and out of shape, 50% if you just need a bit of assistance to get there on time/up that hill, etc...

    It'd work a bit like those grid-tie solar systems that can't produce electricity at all if the grid is out.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:NYC legal electric motorcycle? by hankwang · · Score: 1

      the NYC law I wonder how it'd handle an electric bicycle that uses some sort of strain sensor to decide how much 'assist' to give the rider. IE you could set it to 100% and it'd try to match the power the user is putting into the bike

      Well, it says: "motor that is capable of propelling the device without human power", so that should be legal. Here in the Netherlands, e-bikes have such a strain sensor; I think it measures strain near the back-wheel axis. And it is for legal reasons -- otherwise they would count as a moped and need a license plate and liability insurance.

      By the way, e-bikes are getting rather popular in Netherlands, despite our lack of hills and bike-friendly temperatures. Still feels weird to be taken over at a considerable speed difference by an old lady sitting upright catching wind, with bags of groceries.

  22. illegal in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/LAWSSEAF.cgi?QUERYTYPE=LAWS+&QUERYDATA=$$ADC19-176.2$$@TXADC019-176.2+&LIST=SEA2+&BROWSER=BROWSER+&TOKEN=35384350+&TARGET=VIEW

  23. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... without human power ...", hence the device is designed to only power the bike when the operator is pedaling for the bike not to be classified as motorized scooter.

  24. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "any wheeled device that has
            handlebars that is designed to be stood or sat upon by the operator, is
            powered by an electric motor or by a gasoline motor that is capable of
            propelling the device without human power "

    It's not capable of propelling the device without human power. You need to pedal a few times before it kicks in, they specifically designed it that way for this law.

  25. lazy much? by slashmydots · · Score: 0

    I'm 205 pounds and not amazingly athletics. I can ride a mountain bike at a brisk pace for 10 miles without even sweating. Why oh why would people hop on a bike and be too lazy to pedal?

    1. Re:lazy much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people just use them to assist up steep hills and for acceleration. A human being might be able to go for a long time at a constant speed but has rather limited power output, wearing out quickly when forced to pedal harder than normal. The electric motor is the opposite, it has limited range but much higher power output so you can use it for situations that call for more power than usual without having to worry much about its range.

    2. Re:lazy much? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      1. Define 'Brisk'
      2. Where are you biking that you're not sweating? I bike in Alaska and I sweat. Your brisk might be awfully slow.
      3. From what I've seen, they DO pedal, generally using the motor to provide extra speed, start and hill assistance.

      Consider that this might be the difference between me using a bike to get groceries or driving - simply because of the weight of the groceries I'm planning on getting.

      Worst case, consider the device a range extender - getting people so they're willing to bike for slightly longer distances encourages them to use it even more, and as they use it more they get into better shape, and as they get into better shape their range extends even more again.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:lazy much? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why oh why would people hop on a bike and be too lazy to pedal?

      I have asthma, you insensitive clod. And a bunk knee.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:lazy much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On average, people usually get more lazy. If they are using this to start, they will continue to rely more and more on it.

      I started riding a bicycle to work. I couldn't ride the entire distance but that didn't discourage. I started by finding places to park my truck distances that I could easily make it and take the bicycle out of the back of the truck from there.

      I started increasing the distance after feeling comfortable. I am not the norm though.

  26. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I take it that segways are also banned in NY then?

  27. Doesn't fix the problem by rossdee · · Score: 1

    The problem with 2 wheeled transportation alternatives is the weather

    Bikes are unusable on ice or snow.covered roads
    You'd freeze when theres a wind chill of 20 below 0
    You'd get soaked in the rain
    Too hot in the summer

  28. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by Animats · · Score: 1

    You can drive an electric moped in NYC. Probably cheaper than this thing, too. New York State recognizes three classes of scooters/mopeds (under 20MPH, 20-30MPH, and 30-40MPH top speed) plus motorcycles. The license requirements increase with the max speed. All have lights and turn signals, and a helmet is required.

    With NYC's traffic density, this isn't unreasonable.

  29. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

    So I take it that segways are also banned in NY then?

    If that's the law, then yes they are. Just because police ignore a law or even choose to break it doesn't make it any less illegal for you or I to break the law. They could even use this as an excuse to jail someone they don't like even while they're riding around on their own Segways. This is why people think that selective enforcement is basically handing police a ridiculous amount of power.

    --
    So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
  30. Google for: "elektrische fiets" by Frans+Faase · · Score: 1

    Here in the Netherlands, where we have as many bikes as inhabitants, electrical supported bikes, have become very common. Google for "elektrische fiets" for some images of these. The battery packs are either build into the frame or put under the luggage carrier at the back. We installed under the luggage carrier, it often is a battery pack that can be taken out. The electrical motors are build into the wheel and there is a small dial on the steering wheel with which you can control the extra support needed. To still have to padel yourself, but the electronics will add some extra power to it. Often these bike have a display showing you the battery status. From a first glance these bikes look like normal bikes. Both old en young people are using these kinds of bikes.

  31. Wrong maths? by lorinc · · Score: 1

    On the kickstarter page:

    Power: 750 Watts continuous
    Speed: 18mph without pedaling
    Range: 12 miles with standard battery, 20 miles with extended battery
    Battery: 240Wh / 400Wh

    Well, it seems with the extended battery you can get about 32 minutes or 9.6 miles at 18mph, which is only half the range...

  32. Solex made this, it eats tires by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    A French company named Solex made these with a combustible gasoline engine. They ate tires at a rate that no Citibike exploiter would allow. Watch these get banned/prohibited in 3...2....1.....

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  33. Not Enthusiastic by DaMattster · · Score: 0

    The entire point of the Citibike project was so people would actually get some physical activity. A heathier population drives down cost. I'm shaking my head - no wonder, America's waistline continues to expand as we are unwilling to pedal even on the relatively flat surfaces of many cities. We look to our government to solve problems for us, our government actually comes up with a darn good idea for a change, and we aren't interested because it's 'too hard.' On one hand, I hope these do get banned because they totally defeat the purpose. I started bicycle riding at above 300 pounds and road my way to a much healthier lifestyle. It was hard, I started slowly, but I did it with patience and determination. There is a lot of reward in actually having to reach a goal as a right of passage instead of looking for a quick fix. At no time did I ever look for any motor, electric or otherwise.

  34. Solex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nothing more then a solex, like my grandeltern used.

    One exception: The motor is electric.
    http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=solex&id=EFE54FB0173CF1CDFEF3189818518132D8CFAE7F&FORM=IQFRBA&adlt=strict#view=detail&id=EFE54FB0173CF1CDFEF3189818518132D8CFAE7F&selectedIndex=0

  35. technically illegal in EU by welshie · · Score: 1

    In the EU, any electric-bike that uses any form of throttle, rather than electric-assist (torque sensors) for speed control is deemed by law to by a motorbike, and therefore needs the usual number plates, registration, mandatory insurance, rider licencing and so on. I'd be interesting to see if they can meet EU approval. There's also limits on wattage of the motor (250W), which this exceeds, and limits on the speed at which the motor assist tails off (25km/h) (which this exceeds)

  36. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by Admiral_Grinder · · Score: 1

    Are you sure about this? Sometimes laws are written such that the exception is made in a different section. I check the section that refers to bicycles as well to see if it is there.

  37. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This law is not enforced. Most of bikes used for food delivery in Manhattan have electric assist. I work in Manhattan and see it every day on the streets.

  38. Re:Doesn't fix the problem by Admiral_Grinder · · Score: 1

    The problem with 2 wheeled transportation alternatives is the clothing

    There, fixed.

    "There is no such thing as inappropriate weather, only inappropriate clothing". Really, the weather is not offten the most limiting factor. It is the gear selection.

    Bikes are unusable on ice or snow.covered roads

    Skinny tires sink through the snow. Knobbies grip on top of the snow. Studded tires work great on ice, and have knobs for snow. Studded are the most expensive at $50 a tire, but only needed in winter and last for years.

    You'd freeze when theres a wind chill of 20 below 0

    Clothes, wear them please. Yes 20 below is a really cold windchill. It does stop me, but that is because I don't have wind blocking gear. You can find plenty of blogs of bike commuters that do it daily though.

    You'd get soaked in the rain

    What, you don't take a shower? Once again, there is gear to address that. I'm a lucky person with showers at work, but I don't cycle in my work cloths. Even for short errands, I may drop a clean shirt in my bag for a quick change when I get to where I'm going.

    Too hot in the summer

    Meh, I'll give you that, but that depends on your conditioning. Heat indexes over 105F can be dangerous but that only happens for at most 1 week a year for myself. So I take the motorcycle, which isn't far from being a electric bike.

  39. Nothing new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Powered bikes working according to this principle - a roller that transfers power to a standard bicycle wheel - have been in use in Europe for decades.
    Solex was the best known manufacturer, they manufactured them from 1946 to 1988.

    Even using an electric motor isn't new, Solex themselves launched an electric look-alike of their vintage model about 5 - 10 years ago (I don't remember exactly, but googling for 'solex bikes' or 'esolex' should be able tot pop up some results).

  40. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is at least one workaround. Note the phrase "capable of propelling the device without human power." This allows electric-assist devices, where a minimal human input can be multiplied many times over, just as long as the electric part doesn't kick in unless the rider is pedaling.

  41. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "that is capable of propelling the device without human power".

    This thing won't move without human power. It's only electric assistance.

  42. electric assist ala electric power steering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting until someone 'invents' electric assist working similarly to power electric steering where electric motor would work to amplify user's force making it natural to use and control.

  43. Re:Electric Bikes are Illegal in NYC. Kickstopped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not illegal, because it's not "capable of propelling the device without human power." It requires that a human pedal the bike to speed before the motor assist will kick-in. The article even hints that this is "for legal reasons".

  44. Have fun getting a summons or arrested. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    I am surprised no one has told him motorized bicycles are illegal in NY state:

    See here: http://dmv.ny.gov/node/1984

    What vehicles cannot be registered or operated on New York State sidewalks, streets or highways?
    You can't register or operate any of the motorized devices from the list below on any street, highway, parking lot, sidewalk or other area in New York State that allows public motor vehicle traffic. You may be arrested if you do.

    Motor-assisted Bicycle - a bicycle to which a small motor is attached. A motor-assisted bicycle doesn't qualify for a registration as a motorcycle, moped or ATV and doesn't have the same equipment.

    Reading the kickstarter page reveals more legal information:

    Recently passed legislation in NYC (Local Law 40) outlaws "motorized scooters", defined as:
    "motorized scooter" shall mean any wheeled device that has handlebars that is designed to be stood or sat upon by the operator, is powered by an electric motor or by a gasoline motor that is capable of propelling the device without human power and is not capable of being registered with the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles."

    So since the ShareRoller requires one to be going 1-2mph before the motor will kick in (~one pedal stroke), it's not technically capable of propelling the device without human power, and is therefore designed to be exempt from Local Law 40.

    And then this:

    ShareRoller will technically require 'type approval' due to application of motor power without use of pedals, however there are no known cases of enforcement of the requirement for type approval.

    The information from the DMV website is pretty cut and dry. This device turns a regular bike into a motor assisted bicycle. So its still illegal. NYC defines its own laws so while the system might technically be legal in NYC, its still illegal outside of NYC.

    Bottom line is this: buyer beware, it is not clear whether this is legal or not. It would be a shame if the device gets people into trouble. The inventor should consult with the city and get a clear explanation as to whether this device is in fact legal for street use.

  45. Awesome by PlayerUp.com · · Score: 1

    This is awesome.

  46. Re:Doesn't fix the problem by robsku · · Score: 1

    I'm not claiming it's for everybody but in Finland I used to bike to school (and I still bike around, summers and winters, raining or shining) and having biked under all of above situations I can say that they hardly make bicycles unusable.

    --
    In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
  47. I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having owned a VeloSoleX for many years, they aren't nearly as dangerous as you make them out to be. The weight distribution is not a bicycle, nor is it a moped; if you ride it as if it's either you will have a bad time. The FWD was a wonderful assist up hills and sent you zipping along comfortably in the flats. The front tires (if of the right type) is a Michelin-made white wall (sometimes black as well) that performed nicely on the road and the roller. Many even into the 80s (in the US) were fitted with bike tires that kind of fit and made the entire experience scary.

    Heck you can supposedly still get one for around 2 grand. In a small city or village they are ideal - once you start getting to NYC or any place with a walkup apartment, you likely won't want one as they are generally stored outside/garaged.