Slashdot Mirror


Government Accuses Sprint of Overcharging For Wiretapping Expenses

realized writes with news that the Federal government thinks Sprint overcharged them $21 million when billing for wiretaps. From the article: "Sprint, like all the nation's carriers, must comply with the Communications Assistance in Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which requires telcos to be capable of providing government-ordered wiretapping services. The act also allows carriers to recoup 'reasonable expenses' associated with those services. Sprint inflated charges approximately 58 percent between 2007 and 2010, according to a lawsuit the administration brought against the carrier today. ... The suit said that the wireless carrier breached Federal Communications Commission guidelines of 2006 that prohibited carriers from using intercept charges to recover costs of modifying 'equipment, facilities or services' to comply with the Communications Assistance in Law Enforcement Act."

4 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Well, at least... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the government now gets to experience the same bill-creep the rest of us poor suckers have been subject to all this time.

    1. Re:Well, at least... by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously they should just cancel their account and sign up again as a new customer.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  2. Re:Refund on overhearing my pizza order by penix1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I don't get is why there is an FCC ruling forbidding telcos from being able to bill the government for modifications to their equipment to comply with the law?!?!? So it basically comes down to an unfunded mandate probably passed down to the very customers the government is spying on.

    --
    This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  3. Overages by Oysterville · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should have kept better track of their usage. They could have upgraded to a plan with more included wiretaps, or even considered one of the "Shared Family Wiretap" plans.