Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Wants To Block Illegal Gun Sales

Nerval's Lobster writes "Most of the time, Facebook allows its users to hawk goods or solicit donations on Pages or Timeline postings, comparing such activity to placing a physical note on a bulletin board at a supermarket. Now it plans on regulating users who rely on this method to sell what it calls 'regulated' items, which includes firearms. 'Any time we receive a report on Facebook about a post promoting the private sale of a commonly regulated item, we will send a message to that person reminding him or her to comply with relevant laws and regulations. We will also limit access to that post to people over the age of 18,' Facebook announced as part of the new rules. The social network will also prevent users from posting any sort of items 'that indicate a willingness to evade or help others evade the law,' which means no offers to sell firearms across state lines or without a background check. Presumably, Facebook will have filters in place that allow it to scan for such content. Facebook is a private network, of course, and not (despite its ubiquity) a public utility — meaning it can do whatever it wants with regard to Terms of Use. But that likely won't stop some people from complaining about what they perceive as the company overstepping its boundaries."

5 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. ..or without a background check? by Pizza · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's expressly legal for private inviduals to sell to other private individuals (without crossing state lines) without a background check; indeed it's *illegal* for said private individuals to perform such a background check, at least on the federal level.

    Now you may have some sort of state/local law that requires checks between inviduals, but sheesh.

    --
    -- I ain't broke, but I'm badly bent.
  2. FB is lying, yet again by Cammi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    FB is lying, yet again. They are currently deleting ALL firearms for sale/buy posts.

  3. Re:Selling assult weapons by harrkev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, how do you even define an "assault weapon." An "assault rifle," as defined by Wikipedia is capable of select-fire (AKA machine gun). Those are 100% not OK to just sell, as you need a $200 federal permit, and the approval of a local law-enforcement agency.

    However, the term "assault weapon" is more fuzzy, at least according to Wikipedia.

    What I absolutely love is how the definition (to borrow from Wikipedia again) includes:

    In discussions about firearms laws and politics in the U.S., assault weapon definitions usually include semi-automatic firearms with a detachable magazine and one or more cosmetic, ergonomic, or safety features, such as a flash suppressor, pistol grip, or barrel shroud, respectively.

    Wow. Adding a safety feature and cosmetic features changes the categories. This makes as much sense as taking a street-legal car, painting it red, adding a rear spoiler, roll bars, and suddenly it is a race car that is not legal for street use.

    Seriously, all of this talk about assault weapons gets tiresome. If somebody was shooting at me, the color of the rifle and the presence or absence of a pistol grip would be the last thing on my mind.

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  4. Re:Selling assult weapons by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I use the liberal definition. It's scary and black.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. Re:Simply put... by x0ra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm gonna be negatively commented out, but I disagree with that law. It has become too damn easy to create "felon" out of non-violent crime. Heck, you can become a felon over sheer copyright infringement, or because you were in the wrong place when you were 15 and got caught smoking marijuana... As a result, your constitutional right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness is made void, without any chance to redeem yourself.