Slashdot Mirror


Bringing Speed Reading To the Web

vencs writes "With the latest cycle of speed reading fad catching on all over, there bloomed a rather neat technique called Spritzing (an online implementation of Rapid Serial Visual Presentation). Even before the company released its SDK, many clones popped up, offering bookmarklets that do the same task. It's a cool (though situational) tool for going through text articles quickly (400-600 wpm)."

12 of 47 comments (clear)

  1. Gotta go fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speed reading seems like a solution in search of a problem to me.

    1. Re:Gotta go fast by hawguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Speed reading seems like a solution in search of a problem to me.

      Could you write that more quickly please?

      Spd rdng sms lk a sltn n srch o' a prblm t' me.

  2. Thank the stars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll just be happy if this trend towards low-information-density videos without transcription stops. It's such a colossal waste of everyone's time and bandwidth to have to watch a 45m video of two blowhards talking about something when I could get the same effect from 5 minutes of reading and looking at a couple of graphs or 20-second video demos.

    1. Re:Thank the stars. by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This. Forever this. Nothing is so frustrating as being a visual learner, and having to weed through videos where someone blathers on for 15 minutes to finally show you the 35 seconds of useful information. Also, to people who have 'intros' on their videos that are longer than the actual content after the intro: I hate you all.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    2. Re:Thank the stars. by vux984 · · Score: 2

      This 1000 times. This sort of shit is the bane of my existence:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Who the fuck in their right mind wants a -video- for that?!

      I guess it doesn't offend me that it -exists- but if I'm searching for some sort of problem I do *not* ever wish to find video results to technical problems.

      I want a static page of text with a short description and:

      Solution:
      Tools -> Internet Options -> Programs Tab -> Make default
      Done.

      What kind of mouthbreather needs a freaking video for that?

      I appreciate video where it makes sense... want to explain what parallaxing background are or explain the phases of the moon a couple minutes of video is great. Want to learn orgigami or yoga or knitting video all the way.

      I think the only thing worse than the sort of crap video I linked above is this:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      aaaraaagghh... my head asplode.

  3. Re:It does let you read faster... by pregister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're trying to speed up your casual reading, how casual is it really? I tried the little Spritz button / example thing on the spritz website and thought it was pretty cool. 450 wpm took a short time to get used to but was readable. The problems are with unfamiliar names. It seems like you'd have to train yourself to NOT slow down when coming across an unfamiliar word (for me it was company or city names, or names of people) or in that fraction of a second you're trying to process it you lose words.

  4. Re:It does let you read faster... by jon3k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just need to build a good interface. I'd like to see a "clutch" - a button I hold down to read and let go to stop. Then easy rewind/forward. Maybe a button that moves back to the last punctuation mark? I think SOME of the problems we could solve with good UI design.

  5. Re:It does let you read faster... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd actually disagree. I think it'd be best-suited for casual reading.

    I tried it out on the Wikipedia page linked in the summary and a few other pages, and found that at 500 wpm it quickly got confusing once it started hitting references, parentheticals, and other asides, since the flow would be broken up by the various brackets, parentheses, and content out of the main flow of the sentence. In contrast, it did great at that speed on the portions of the page that were typical prose, and I found I wasn't having to focus much at all to keep up at 500 wpm, despite having had no practice in using the method, nor any practice at other speed reading techniques.

    So long as you're not reading something that's beyond your vocabulary, I'd expect it to work exceedingly well. That said, once it hit a word I wasn't expecting (typically a proper name I didn't recognize), I found that I was "jarred" for a split second, throwing me off. The parentheticals and other such text had a similar effect. But were I reading a novel, I'd expect this system to work rather well, and would love to see an implementation of it for eReaders on tablets. Plus, the actual Spritz thing had a feature to jump back a sentence if you missed something, which, taken altogether, would still be much faster than a typical reading pace.

  6. Re:It does let you read faster... by geekoid · · Score: 2

    but reality, seldom the whole sentence.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. Feature Request by AdamThor · · Score: 2

    Dictionary of white listed words 6th grade reading level (to be displayed at max speed, the rest at a settable sub-speed)
    Long words broken up by syllable
    Dead-man switch - hold down to keep reading release to pause and display Fwd and Rew

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
  8. Re:It does let you read faster... by hazem · · Score: 2

    Not suited, then, to casual reading.

    It doesn't seem suited to serious reading either. When reading technical material, I need to read more than one word at a time, and when it gets challening, I go over sentences a couple times. I also often find things that mean I have scan back a paragraph or two to see if what I just read fits in with the previous material.

    I guess for me, reading is not a linear activity. It's more of an exercise of finding and making connections throughout the text and with other texts. I just don't get that with reading one word followed by the next.

  9. Takes longer... by RJFerret · · Score: 2

    Takes longer to consume a page, since normally you don't read each and every word, you glance across a page picking up critical words to glean the meaning.

    Running it on their webpage, I got bored waiting for it, meanwhile in less time previously, I'd digested the entire page.

    That being said, I passed the link on to a dyslexic friend, we'll see how she feels, presuming she can successfully read my G+ post to her. ;-)