Slashdot Mirror


NVIDIA Unveils Lineup of GeForce 800M Series Mobile GPUs, Many With Maxwell

MojoKid writes "The power efficiency of NVIDA's Maxwell architecture make it ideal for mobile applications, so today's announcement by NVIDIA of a new top-to-bottom line-up of mobile GPUs—most of them featuring the Maxwell architecture—should come as no surprise. Though a couple of Kepler and even Fermi-based GPUs still exist in NVIDIA's new line-up, the heart of the product stack leverages Maxwell. The entry-level parts in the GeForce 800M series consist of the GeForce GT 820M, 830M, and 840M. The 820M is a Fermi-based GPU, but the 830M and 840M are new chips that leverage Maxwell. The meat of the GeForce GTX 800M series consist of Kepler-based GPUs, though Maxwell is employed in the more mainstream parts. NVIDIA is claiming the GeForce GTX 880M will be fastest mobile GPU available, but the entire GTX line-up will offer significantly higher performance then any integrated graphics solution. The GeForce GTX 860M and 850M are essentially identical to the desktop GeForce GTX 750 Ti, save for different frequencies and memory configurations. There are a number of notebooks featuring NVIDIA's GeForce 800M series GPUs coming down the pipeline from companies like Alienware, Asus, Gigabyte, Lenovo, MSI and Razer, though others are sure the follow suit. Some of the machines will be available immediately."

83 comments

  1. W0000000T1!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just in time for Titanfall

    1. Re:W0000000T1!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww man. Right after I buy a laptop with a 770M.

  2. Leverage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This marketing speak is poisoning our language.

  3. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I invented the colour Orange. Prove me wrong.

  4. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by benjfowler · · Score: 0, Troll

    Slashdot needs a "-1 Stupid" moderation.

  5. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the color ( and colour ) orange patented, so actually its up to you to prove that you invented it first.

  6. Maxwell... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    That's the second biggest GPU I've ever seen.

    1. Re:Maxwell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what she said.

    2. Re:Maxwell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never heard her say anything about 'second'.

    3. Re:Maxwell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Nvidia

      ------------ Linus Torvalds

    4. Re:Maxwell... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      You should stop playing with it then!

    5. Re:Maxwell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hold ATI/AMD with much more contempt due to decades worth of shitty, artefacting, crashing drivers. At least Nvidia works.

  7. seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by bloodhawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought I would always want discrete graphics. But nowadays the majority of laptops really have no need of it, The AMD and Intel integrated offerings while not amazing are more than adequate for the vast majority of purposes. my latest 2 laptops both use integrated Intel 4th gen and handle laptop needs completely for both my work and the limited gaming I do on a laptop. I would imagine Nvidia are very uncomfortable with the way their market has been contracting over the last couple of years.

    1. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you jest. The next step are retina like monitors. Find discrete graphics to deliver performance on those beasts.

    2. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought I would always want discrete graphics.

      Never bet against integration.

      I would imagine Nvidia are very uncomfortable

      For the time being there is lots of money to make in GPUs and NVidia is doing fine. Ultimately, however, the whole company is one big bet against integration.

    3. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Those of us doing more with computers than editing text documents and refreshing facebook still need descrete GPUs.

    4. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Even multi configurations with top model GPUs don't do well with 3840x2400 resolutions.

    5. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

      The AMD and Intel integrated offerings while not amazing are more than adequate for the vast majority of purposes

      Not only that, but the discrete graphics cards consume substantial amounts of power and generate more heat than the rest of the device combined.

    6. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Kjella · · Score: 1

      According to the latest market statistics 66% of PCs overall use embedded graphics. Even Steam has a 16% Intel share and probably some AMD APUs that aren't separated out. I don't know about you but anything "serious" I do like work doesn't push the GPU one bit, the only thing that does is gaming. And not everybody is a gamer or their idea of gaming is more like Candy Crush. On that note, I loved The Walking Dead, here's the system requirements:

      Windows Operating system: Windows XP / Vista / Windows 7
      Processor: 2.0 GHz Pentium 4 or equivalent
      Memory: 3 GB RAM
      Video Card: ATI or NVidia card w/ 512 MB RAM
      Direct X 9.0c
      Audio card required

      Oh so that's like any CPU and graphics card made in the last 10 years or so. What about something like Civilization V (okay it's a bit old but there's no Civ6 yet)

      Operating System: Windows XP SP3/ Windows Vista SP2/ Windows 7
      Processor: Dual Core CPU
      Memory: 2GB RAM
      Hard Disk Space: 8 GB Free
      DVD-ROM Drive: Required for disc-based installation
      Video: 256 MB ATI HD2600 XT or better, 256 MB nVidia 7900 GS or better, or Core i3 or better integrated graphics
      Sound: DirectX 9.0c-compatible sound card
      DirectX: DirectX version 9.0c

      Scary requirements yeah? What about World of Warcraft, that's some million gamers:

      Windows XP / Windows Vista / Windows® 7 / Windows 8 / Windows 8.1 with the latest service pack
      Intel Pentium D or AMD Athlon 64 X2
      NVIDIA GeForce 6800 or
      ATI Radeon X1600 Pro (256 MB)
      2 GB RAM (1 GB Windows XP)

      I could go on, but long story short unless you're into the latest and greatest 3D games no it's not really required. Sure I need a discrete graphics card, but I know I'm in the minority. And I just need it to run Skyrim and stuff like that, I don't need the worst SLI/CF setup for twitcher FPS games either.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us doing more with computers than editing text documents and refreshing facebook still need descrete GPUs.

      And spelling checks

    8. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      I only do software development, some gaming and photo editing on my laptop, yes I am more than aware their are a lot of areas that still need discrete graphics for laptops, but it is a rapidly shrinking market. Even desktops now the integrated option is taking an increasingly large share.

    9. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of those requirements are somewhat BS, I just got out my old crappy Dell w/ Win7 on it and a 256MB 7900GS (4GB ram, Core2 duo) and installed Civ 5.

      It crashed at anything WXGA or higher res on medium settings, lowest settings I got maybe 10FPS and at 800x600 (with horrible scaling and an incorrect aspect ratio, along with incorrect UI bugs associated with the incorrect aspect ratio) I managed maybe 20FPS - while absolutely destroying my GPU (you wouldn't want this thing on your lap, that's for sure).

      If you consider gaming running on lowest settings with headache inducing stuttering, then sure - have fun. Most people want 30Hz and some sort of visual representation that aligns to what the devs intended you to see (s.t. you don't hit obscure bugs around UI not aligning to what you're seeing!)

    10. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are about a decade out of date. The integrated graphics now are more than adequate for anything except top end gaming and some design/video editing work. The average person has Zero need of discrete graphics in a laptop in the vast majority of use cases. Use cases that require discrete graphics I would say is down to sub 10% of the laptop market now and I would not be surprised if it is well under 5%.

    11. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      surely you jest. There are dozens if not hundreds of monitors with retina like or higher quality laptop screens with integrated graphics. Retina is only above average at best now. Even my now relatively old Samsung series 9 with integrated graphics runs at higher than res than retina.

    12. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by guises · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No personal experience with this, but according to Anandtech Intel's Iris Pro graphics are reasonably fast but don't provide any power consumption advantage over discrete offerings. In fact they're worse, and with the power benefits in the new chips mentioned above they should be a lot worse in the future. Seeing as power consumption and cost are the only compelling reasons to be using integrated graphics, discrete chips still seem to have a fair amount of life in them.

    13. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I would imagine Nvidia are very uncomfortable with the way their market has been contracting over the last couple of years.

      At some point enough x86/x64 patents will expire that Nvidia will be able license the remaining ones and so an x64 chip of their own.

      Or alternatively they could sell Arm+GPU SOCs instead - arguably Arm+GPU is a better bet than x64+GPU because the sales of phones and tablets will exceed the sales of x64 PCs. Of course the margins are likely to be thinner because there's a lot of competition in the Arm SOC market - Apple and Samsung have their own in house designs and outside that it looks like Qualcomm have most of the rest of the market.

      Still it's not like AMD is doing very well competing with Intel. And the reason Qualcomm do so well is because they design their own Arm microarchitectures - Scorpion and Krait were both designed in house and were higher performance than the best Arm designed microarchitecture. So I guess NVidia could be aimed to compete with Qualcomm since Denver is in house too.

      Actually Apple A6 and A7 chips are like this too. Apple have an Arm license but the chips are designed in house. So it seems like of the Arm SOCs that actually sell well only Samsung is using Arm's designs and only in some markets

      E.g.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      Galaxy S4 models use of one of two processors, depending on the region and network compatibility. The S4 version for North America, most of Europe, parts of Asia, and other countries contains Qualcomm's Snapdragon 600 system-on-chip, containing a quad-core 1.9 GHz Krait 300 CPU and an Adreno 320 GPU. The chip also contains a modem which supports LTE. Other models include Samsung's Exynos 5 Octa system-on-chip with a heterogeneous CPU. The octa-core CPU comprises a 1.6 GHz quad-core Cortex-A15 cluster and a 1.2 GHz quad-core Cortex-A7 cluster. The chip can dynamically switch between the two clusters of cores based on CPU usage; the chip switches to the A15 cores when more processing power is needed, and stays on the A7 cores to conserve energy on lighter loads

      So there are two versions. A Qualcomm Snapdragon one for the US and Europe and an Exynos one for Asia. The Exynos one uses Cortex-A15 and Cortex-A7 in a BIG.little configuration.

      Unfortunately they fucked up the big.LITTLE configuration

      http://www.anandtech.com/show/...

      The Exynos 5410 saw limited use, appearing in some international versions of the Galaxy S 4 and nothing else. Part of the problem with the design was a broken implementation of the CCI-400 coherent bus interface that connect the two CPU islands to the rest of the SoC. In the case of the 5410, the bus was functional but coherency was broken and manually disabled on the Galaxy S 4. The implications are serious from a power consumption (and performance) standpoint. With all caches being flushed out to main memory upon a switch between CPU islands. Neither ARM nor Samsung LSI will talk about the bug publicly, and Samsung didn't fess up to the problem at first either - leaving end users to discover it on their own.

      You can see the results here

      http://www.gsmarena.com/samsun...

      The Qualcomm one has much better talk time - almost twice as much.

      You have to wonder what the hell has happened to Arm to be honest. It seems like Apple (A6, A7) and Qualcomm (Scorpion, Krait) do a much better job at Arm core design than Arm/Samsung.

      It'll be interesting to see battery life tests on the Snapdragon 801 and Exynos 5422 versions of the S5 to see if Samsung have got big.LITTLE working like it is supposed to. Actually I wonder whether big.LITTLE is even necessary - it seems like it would be much easier to just

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    14. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by chrish · · Score: 1

      Given the ridiculous prevalence of laptops with absolutely pathetic displays (1366x768 on a 15"? really?), "most" users aren't even going to need the integrated Intel 4th gen video. A dumb frame buffer would probably fit their needs.

      --
      - chrish
    15. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      At some point enough x86/x64 patents will expire that Nvidia will be able license the remaining ones and so an x64 chip of their own.

      But after x64 there were SSE3, SSE 4.x, AVX, AVX2, now AVX512 coming soon. Those are the wide SIMD instructions. This stuff isn't strictly needed - yet, already SSE2 gets needed to run some 32bit code like some flash versions and codecs, this annoys some current Athlon XP users. Maybe some other stuff like hardware encryption is "protected".

      So the fullest x86/x64 support will be left to AMD and Intel only for the foreseeable future.
      Nvidia is betting on ARMv8, with an ARMv8 + Kepler (of the GK208 variant) chip this year and probably ARMv8 + Maxwell next year.

    16. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I thought I would always want discrete graphics. But nowadays the majority of laptops really have no need of it, The AMD and Intel integrated offerings while not amazing are more than adequate for the vast majority of purposes. my latest 2 laptops both use integrated Intel 4th gen and handle laptop needs completely for both my work and the limited gaming I do on a laptop. I would imagine Nvidia are very uncomfortable with the way their market has been contracting over the last couple of years.

      Heck, we just got a bunch of new PCs in and we think the external discrete graphics was merely a checkbox item.

      The computers had Intel Haswell 4770 processors, and also came with NVidia GeForce 620 cards (really low end cards). It's so far been a tossup - Windows finds the Haswell GPU far faster than the 620, benchmarks online seem to put the 620 only a tiny bit faster, etc.

      Enough that we don't know whether to leave them in or take them out

    17. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Skyrim runs a treat on intel's HD4000, tbh I haven't switched on the GPUs in my laptop for anything except FF14, Saints Row, and BF3/4 since I bought it! LoL, Diablo 3, Starcraft all the Source Engine games, Xcom, Naruto, and PS2 Emulation all run near or at 60 FPS @ native res on just the integrated i7 chip.

      I have been blown away with the performance of intel's little chip, this advance is even more staggering when I think about the GMA chips not even being able to run WoW 9 years ago.

    18. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HD4000 handles civ 5 with no issues on an i7 notebook with 8GB RAM (I play it once a week at least)

    19. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skyrim runs like shit on an Intel HD 4600, which is significantly faster than the HD 4000. The game has to be set to the lowest detail and still only manages about 30 FPS.

    20. Re:seperate mobile GPU's is declining market by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      By ordering low-end GPU, you annoy everyone -- the users have to put up with crappy chips, IT has to support more complex systems, and budgeting has to pay for chips noone wants. So instead, order most of the laptops without discrete GPU to save a few bucks. Then order a few with high-end GPU for the few people who want them.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  8. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I invented the colour Orange. Prove me wrong.

    Can I blame you for the overpriced mobile phone service company by the same name?

  9. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by MrL0G1C · · Score: 0

    To prove evolution false, look for but never find any proof of genetic mutations.

    Oops, we found them, many times. Antibiotics resistant mutations of bacteria that weren't resistant before is probably the best example of evolution and Darwinism.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  10. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by sexconker · · Score: 1

    I invented the colour Orange. Prove me wrong.

    The color "orange" used to be called red-yellow. The color is named after the fruit.
    The fact that you claim to have invented the color yet refer to it by its adopted name instead of the original proves that you're a liar who has nothing to do with the color's invention/naming/use.

  11. Advert disguised as story by digitaltraveller · · Score: 0, Troll

    This takes the cake. I've never complained once about an obvious advert disguised as a story.

    But to pimp this, this CRAP company that has been so incredibly hostile to the free and open source community is such bad judgement.
    The new slashdot management seems determined to undermine the loyalty of their userbase. What a disgrace.

    1. Re:Advert disguised as story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still get the awesome DV - Series laptops from HP in my repair shop. I hate them. It's great when you have to tell customers "You're fucked most likely." Just needed to vent... :]

    2. Re:Advert disguised as story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least their drivers work most of the time.. The lack of decent radeon drivers make them non-starters.

  12. X265 decoding in hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the GeForce 800M series have hardware support for x265 (HEVC) decoding?

    Can it do HDMI 2.0 and support 4k output to a UHDTV?

  13. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    tl, i actually skimmed it a bit. the only thing I could grab on to is this:

    If evolution be not true, the only explanation for the appearance of varied life on the planet is intelligent design.

    This is a logical leap, and creates a flaw in the remainder of the post. If the only two choices are evolution or ID, then an argument against evolution is an argument for ID (which is what the rest of the words are about I think). but why can't there be other potential theories? I'm sure the world has thought of hundreds.

    whatevs, not a good use of time.

  14. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Don't encourage the bastard.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  15. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I refer to it by the name most recognised in today's society.

  16. I don't need more powerful. I just need cooler! by GuitarNeophyte · · Score: 1

    I've toasted two laptop monitors because of trying to play too many high-needs video games on them. Both of the monitors theoretically were good enough for the games by specs, but both of them burnt out within two years of when I bought them (admitedly, they were both a couple years old when I purchased them). With the first laptop, I just thought it was an age thing and didn't think enough of it, but with the second one, I realized the sad pattern. Now, I play my games with an external fan running, blowing cool air under the laptop, with the laptop on a stand to increase airflow. (I'd stick to playing games on desktops, but I'm living abroad at the moment, and a desktop takes up too much room in the suitcases)

    All this being said, it seems like each new generation of laptop video card is more powerful, but I would just like to know of a mid-range card that ran really cool. That would help me much more than power.

    1. Re:I don't need more powerful. I just need cooler! by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Monitors?

    2. Re:I don't need more powerful. I just need cooler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really depends on what your gaming needs are. Despite the bias against them by many integrated graphics in the top end chips are good enough for low to mid range gaming and they stay many times cooler than the heat monsters that are the discrete graphics. If you are in to the cutting edge or COD type FPS's then anything that does the job required in a laptop generates huge heat.

    3. Re:I don't need more powerful. I just need cooler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way this is true. You simply have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

    4. Re:I don't need more powerful. I just need cooler! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I'm with the others not understanding what you're on about with monitors, but indeed additional cooling is useful. The thing is no matter how efficient the CPU and GPU are, it's a product of the watt budget and how the laptop is designed. Depends on the thickness/thinness, heatsinks and fans, build quality etc. so it's really on a laptop per laptop basis.

      Modern stuff also throttles, it gets slower when needed so the laptop won't melt itself, that plays in both sides.. Less chance of failure, but additional cooling now is needed to get higher performance and a cynical laptop vendor may exploit this by undersizing the cooling esp. with the model that has a bigger faster GPU.

    5. Re:I don't need more powerful. I just need cooler! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      The new Maxwell stuff quite possibly has higher performance per watt than the Intel GPU. This may make the dedicated GPUs a bit more interesting again (and if the Intel GPU doesn't run, more watts can be spent on the CPU performance which can allow better framerate). Sure, stay modest enough on the wattage.

    6. Re:I don't need more powerful. I just need cooler! by GuitarNeophyte · · Score: 1

      My appologies for not being very clear. I don't have my tools here, nor do I have random spare parts to change out and test which components have problems with my system at the moment. The two laptops could have had different problems, but the net result was that the screens on both were no longer functional. It was my presumption (as I said, I don't have my tools to verify) that excess heat was the cause of my computer issues. For that reason, I would prefer to have a cooler-running laptop, so I don't feel compelled to use additional cooling. My presumptions could be completely wrong, and I fully admit the deficiencies in my explanation.

    7. Re:I don't need more powerful. I just need cooler! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      No problem. Also my above reply was pessimistic, better to check some reviews after finding a nice model.
      The new GTX 850M and GT840M feel nice (the latter being rather slow if you're into demanding games)

  17. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, AC, are so fucking retarded. You are a disgrace to YHWH.

  18. thanks for the report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cool. was wondering when Nvidia was going to release the 800 series GPUs

  19. Re:'Leverage' is a noun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AWWW SHlllllllllll~T, S0ME0NE T00K A N0UN `N VERBED lT!!!!1

  20. Re:WRONG- there is but ONE Maxwell chip by Smauler · · Score: 1

    I don't care about the architecture, how much RAM they have, how many pipelines they have, with graphics cards. Seriously, I don't know enough for it to be relevant to me. All I want to know is how fast it is (playing games), and how much it costs. Those are the only 2 things that are relevant to me. I don't care what die it was shipped on, I don't care about anything but price/performance. Some might care about power usage... I don't (within reasonable limits).

  21. Re:Linux by loosescrews · · Score: 1

    Have you tried a recent kernel? Intel's linux suport has been greatly improving and is now quite good.

  22. What are you doing - pray tell... by frnic · · Score: 1

    Other than professionally modeling or doing video editing, or playing #D games - what use does a average person have for discrete graphics today?

    1. Re:What are you doing - pray tell... by CadentOrange · · Score: 1

      Other than professionally modeling...

      Look, this is Slashdot. You're not going to find professional models here.

    2. Re:What are you doing - pray tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none

  23. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But be this comment not true then retardedness as it is unproven must therefore be a lie, as be it a truthful statement a lie it cannot be. As be it not true therefore and thus it has been shown that retarded this AC probably is not, because it is not proven as it will be shown.

    Thus we have shown that retarded AC that speaks in therefores and be it trues is retarded. And can't write for shit.

    Worse than me even.

  24. Intel = bad drivers by AMDinator · · Score: 1

    Intel's refusal to properly support HDMI/DisplayPort to a TV without clipping the black levels makes their integrated GPUs worthless to me. I'm selling my newer laptop in favor of keeping my old one that has ATI graphics for this reason alone.

  25. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    TL;DR

  26. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, this time you only get "-1 Troll".

    *cheerful Santa Claus belly laugh*

  27. Re:Linux by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Now? Intel GPU support has been excellent under Linux even back when the crusty GMA chips were all we had.

  28. Requirements might be for XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Win7 on it and a 256MB 7900GS

    I asume that means Aero is enabled. That will use up a huge percentage of video RAM.
    It's likely both on XP (for which I assume the specs were written originally) and Win7 with Aero off will work much, much better.

    1. Re:Requirements might be for XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aero doesn't run when you play games full screen.

    2. Re:Requirements might be for XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the desktop is not utilising GPU while a game is running so whether you are using aero or not is completely irrelevant to performance

  29. Re:Linux by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

    Now? Intel GPU support has been excellent under Linux even back when the crusty GMA chips were all we had.

    Except for the bugs. I used Linux, including tracking the latest kernels, for over 6 years with my last laptop having an Intel 915GM.

    Every version of the kernel during that time rendered occasional display glitches of one sort or another, such as a line or spray of random pixels every few weeks. Rare but not bug free.

    And that's just using a terminal window. It couldn't even blit or render text with 100% reliability...

    I investigated one of those bugs and it was a genuine bug in the kernel's tracking of cache flushes and command queuing.
    In the process I found more bugs than I cared to count in the modesetting code.

    Considering the number of people working on the Intel drivers and the time span (6 years) that was really surprising, but that's how it was.

  30. Re:Linux by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1


            Section "Device"
                    Identifier "Intel"
                    Driver "intel"
                    Option "DebugWait" "true"
            EndSection

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  31. Re:WRONG- there is but ONE Maxwell chip by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Not that you seem to care, but nvidia is precisely launching a SECOND Maxwell chip with that laptop announcement, first was GM107 in desktop GTX 750 and Ti, now in 860M, 850M : it has five "SMM" and a 128bit bus. Second is GM108 in Geforce 830M and 840M, a smaller GPU with less SMM on 64bit bus. With DDR3 memory. That gives low performance, but it's clearly a low power low budget part.

  32. Re:Linux by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

    Thanks! But too late. That machine died this time last year, after 6 years of excellent service. I moved on to new hardware.

    Hopefully the xorg.conf is useful to someone else.

    I've just looked up what people are saying about DebugWait, and I see the font corruption - that's just one of the types of corruption I saw!
    But perhaps that was the only kind left by the time my laptop died.

    Just a note to others, that DebugWait doesn't fix the font corruption for everyone according to reports. But, it's reported as fixed by the time of the kernel in Ubuntu 13.04 according to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu...

    I stand by my view that Intel GPU support never quite reached "excellent" because of various long term glitches, although I'd give it a "pretty good" and still recommend Intel GPUs (as long as you don't get the PowerVR ones - very annoying that was, that surprise wrecked a job I was on). Judging by the immense number of kernel patches consistently over years, it has received a lot of support, and in most ways worked well.

    Getting slightly back on topic with nVidia: Another laptop I've used has an nVidia GPU, and that's been much, much worse under Ubuntu throughout its life, than the laptop with Intel GPU. Some people say nVidia's good for them with Linux, but not this laptop. Have tried all available drivers, Nouveau, nVidia, nVidia's newer versions etc. Nothing works well, Unity3d always renders ("chugs") about 2-3 frames per second when it animates anything, which is barely usable, the GPU temperature gets very hot when it does the slightest things, and visiting any WebGL page in Firefox instantly crashes X with a segmentation fault due to a bug in OpenGL somewhere, requiring a power cycle to recover properly. So I'd still rate nVidia poorer than Intel in my personal experience of Linux on laptops :)

  33. Re: How to Falsify Evolution by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    The color Orange is defined by a frequency range. One can allocate and name a frequency range, but never invent it. Since said color is the vibration of reflected light within that range, and light existed well before you did, you could not possibly have invented it.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  34. It doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mobile gpu drivers are crap, they are an afterthought and after about 6 months they seem to be forgotten. Cooling is often a problem also. Laptop solutions are just utter shite. (Unless you get a quadro, then at least your drivers will be usable).

  35. Re:'Leverage' is a noun... by cryptizard · · Score: 1

    That statement is contrary to the OED so... I'm going with them.

  36. Re: How to Falsify Evolution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Light never existed in the specific wavelength of orange until I commanded it.
    There is no evidence to suggest otherwise so it must be true.

  37. Re: How to Falsify Evolution by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Dear Moron,
    You cannot invent that which pre-exists you ..

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  38. Re: How to Falsify Evolution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Where is your evidence that it existed before me?
    You have no evidence that light of that wavelength existed yesterday.

  39. Re: How to Falsify Evolution by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

    Shut the fuck up you ignorant moron.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun