Slashdot Mirror


Obama Administration Transparency Getting Worse

schwit1 writes "The government's own figures from 99 federal agencies covering six years show that halfway through its second term, the administration has made few meaningful improvements in the way it releases records. In category after category — except for reducing numbers of old requests and a slight increase in how often it waived copying fees — the government's efforts to be more open about its activities last year were their worst since President Barack Obama took office."

38 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Most Transparent Ever! by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    “This is the most transparent administration in history,” -- Barack Obama, February 2013

    "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." -- Napoleon, Animal Farm, by George Orwell

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    1. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      “This is the most transparent administration in history,” -- Barack Obama, February 2013

      He must have been speaking about how obvious their stance with regarding releasing information was.

      But to make a counter-point, much as I loathe to do so, it's also possible with all the NSA/Snowden stories that they have faced more requests for documents that are classified than typical. It would be nice to see the chart from TFA displayed as a 100% breakdown rather than a stacked breakdown.

    2. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by poetmatt · · Score: 2

      Anything refused under that angle is basically denial of working with the FOIA process, basically using "national security" as an excuse to get out of everything via the loophole as designed.

      That is exactly a lack of transparency, not an excuse for it.

    3. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by funwithBSD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Transparent as in we can see right through this bullshit.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps that is what he meant about most transparent administration? You know, kind of like trying to beat the world land speed record.... oh wait thats fast...for single wheeled vehic....oh how about single wheeled electric, multi-passenger vehicles? What No record?....oh we have that so beat!

      Set the bar low enough, and you barely need to step over it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2

      I look forward to the Slashdot Socialists finding some way of blaming this on Bush, Bush, Busch or bush*.

      *H.W., W., Gardens, or that bit of flora near the Rose Garden

      dude, the bloom is off the rose. even the socialists have lost their love for obama. I think there are many reasoned arguments that can support obama's policies and actions, but the fanbois have moved on. for me it was the NSA thing.

    6. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretty much. Obama ran on the platform of 'change.' He isn't bringing it. The only reason his supporters continued to support him last election was because a democrat not advancing their agenda would still be better than a republican openly fighting against it.

    7. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He has broken the law plenty too, but the House won't try impeachment because they know the Senate majority does not care the law has been broken they are going to protect their guy.

      The GOP learned its lesson the last time around, its not politically useful to impeach a president unless you have a Senate willing to follow through with a conviction and removal from office.

      As far as anyone else doing anything about it, the SCOTUS will find some weasel wordy way to conclude they haven't got standing.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously? Republican or Democrat, Liberal or whatever.. it makes no difference.

      http://www.ted.com/talks/lawrence_lessig_we_the_people_and_the_republic_we_must_reclaim

    9. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would love to give all politicians a break...somewhere around C1 or C2.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    10. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I'm not even sure at this point WHY they're moving towards opacity. (Is opacity the opposite of transparency when it comes to government?) He's not going for another term, so it's not like hiding details from the voters is going to get him another term. And he's obviously not going to get in real legal trouble, he'd be pardoned by whoever the next guy was, worst case scenario. He's keeping Bush administration secrets about torture secret. He was elected in part because people thought he was an anti-bush. You'd think self interest alone would cause him to expose it during his first term. He's not winning any support from anyone for continuing the war on terror, his supporters dislike it, most voters are apathetic, and the opposition is doing anything they can to stop him no matter what.

      The only thing that makes sense to me is that the administration is actually convinced it's important for national security. I'm not open-minded enough to believe torturing people in secret keeps anyone safe, so it's frightening that the administration is that deluded.

    11. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have forgotten the Democrat Catechism

      "Everything Is Bush's Fault, Now, and Forever. Amen"

      Now go say 3 "Our Obamas" and 4 "Hail Hillarys"

    12. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pretty much. Obama ran on the platform of 'change.' He isn't bringing it.

      Well that does it. I am not voting for him again.

    13. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by kenj0418 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would love to give all politicians a break...somewhere around C1 or C2.

      This would require that they have a spine - so that leaves out 99% of politicians.

    14. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by Feyshtey · · Score: 4, Informative

      He took an oath to protect and defend the Consitituion. He's not only failed to do so, but he's actively campaigned against the laws and procedures in regard to it. He's ignored it by circumventing or coopting the co-equal branches. If that's not ipeachable actions I dont know what is.

      --
      "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
    15. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by lexman098 · · Score: 2

      The problem with this is that it just pushes the pendulum back a little bit more. I just opted to throw my vote away in protest.

    16. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's amazing you have to prove you are actually harmed by NSA spying to get standing, when our core concept in creating a government is the assumption government is up to no good and will abuse power.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    17. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by martas · · Score: 2

      its not politically useful to impeach a president unless you have a Senate willing to follow through with a conviction and removal from office.

      That, or it's not politically useful to [try to] impeach a president for shit they know they're going to do themselves in 4, 8, 12, or 16 years

    18. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by NuAngel · · Score: 2

      Kept more promises than broken... but there are a LOT of broken and a lot of "muddied" campaign promises. http://www.politifact.com/trut...

    19. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by lexman098 · · Score: 2

      I did vote for a third-party/independent. Like I said...

    20. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 2

      That you classify this as throwing your vote away is sad.

      Perhaps you're not familiar with the fact that gaining even small numbers of votes helps candidates with future fundrainsing efforts, public campaign financing, etc.

      Perhaps you're not aware of the fact that meaningful political shifts in this country tend to coincide with third parties gaining the attention of the electorate.

      Perhaps it's news to you that the only way to throw away your vote in this country is to vote for the democrats or the republicans who don't need your vote to split the win between the two of them anyway.

      You've got it backwards, my friend. Voting third party is the only way to make your vote count.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    21. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Enough C4 will insure that there's a break around C1 or C2. But with enough, you don't need to worry if they're spineless.

    22. Re:Most Transparent Ever! by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While we're on this "fuck the republicrats" sidebar, I'd like to take this opportunity to spam you about WOLF-PAC.

      I found out about them here on slashdot, and I've been supporting their efforts ever since.

      The idea is to do an end-run around the federal legislature and get a supermajority of state legislators to agree to campaign finance reform. Undo Citizens United and a whole slew of other "money in politics" problems by threatening to get another amendment tacked onto our federal constitution.

      In the past, even the threat of such a possibility has caused the federal legislature to act. It's actually not as loony of an idea as it initially sounds. I highly recommend you look into WOLF-PAC, if you haven't already. And yes, they should've picked a less-silly name.

      This country needs more critical thinkers involved in the political process. That's a problem because usually critical thinkers know better than to get involved in this shit. However, that may be a luxury that we can't much longer afford.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  2. Re:"halfway through its second term" ? by bobbied · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless someone is planning to pull a Kennedy on him, he's got 34 months to go...

    Oh please NO! I don't want to get Biden as president with all the sympathy of having to take over under those circumstances. Not on your life.

    I'll keep the guy I know over dementia prone Biden who would be wheels off nuts. Obama will be totally emasculated by the end of this year when his party looses the Senate. Let him spend his last two years in office planning for his presidential library. If we are ever going to fix this, he has to stay in office and be marginalized as much as possible.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  3. Re:"halfway through its second term" ? by JDAustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You really think Obama is going to act like other former presidents and leave DC for Chicago or Hawaii? His ego would never allow for it. He will stay in DC and be a thorn in the side of whoever the next president is (Dem or Rep).

    As to Biden....tell me again why Palin was so bad compared to Biden again?

  4. Re:I appreciate that. by Feyshtey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about if we start by acknowledging that there was never supposed to be a "ruling class" and elminating that philosophy from our culture.

    --
    "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
  5. Re:"halfway through its second term" ? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because Palin was a soundbite politician. She had an open distaste for carefully considering all sides of an issue, favoring the use of quick slogans ('Drill Baby Drill') to win over the unthinking. It's always hard to tell a politicians image from reality - behind closed doors she could have been a genius in all things - but the image she carefully projected was of the quick-thinking renegade who didn't have the time to actually read any reports or listen to advisers, but instead promised she could run a country on gut instinct and American luck.

  6. Re:Third Parties have stepped up by canadiannomad · · Score: 2

    "I come in peace," it said, adding after a long moment of further grinding, "take me to your Lizard."

    Ford Prefect, of course, had an explanation for this, as he sat with Arthur and watched the nonstop frenetic news reports on television, none of which had anything to say other than to record that the thing had done this amount of damage which was valued at that amount of billions of pounds and had killed this totally other number of people, and then say it again, because the robot was doing nothing more than standing there, swaying very slightly, and emitting short incomprehensible error messages.

    "It comes from a very ancient democracy, you see..."

    "You mean, it comes from a world of lizards?"

    "No," said Ford, who by this time was a little more rational and coherent than he had been, having finally had the coffee forced down him, "nothing so simple. Nothing anything like to straightforward. On its world, the people are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people."

    "Odd," said Arthur, "I thought you said it was a democracy."

    "I did," said ford. "It is."

    "So," said Arthur, hoping he wasn't sounding ridiculously obtuse, "why don't the people get rid of the lizards?"

    "It honestly doesn't occur to them," said Ford. "They've all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they've voted in more or less approximates to the government they want."

    "You mean they actually vote for the lizards?"

    "Oh yes," said Ford with a shrug, "of course."

    "But," said Arthur, going for the big one again, "why?"

    "Because if they didn't vote for a lizard," said Ford, "the wrong lizard might get in. Got any gin?"

    "What?"

    "I said," said Ford, with an increasing air of urgency creeping into his voice, "have you got any gin?"

    "I'll look. Tell me about the lizards."

    Ford shrugged again.

    "Some people say that the lizards are the best thing that ever happened to them," he said. "They're completely wrong of course, completely and utterly wrong, but someone's got to say it."

    --
    Hmm, the humour and sarcasm seem to have been be lost on you.
  7. Re:"halfway through its second term" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, because the GOP has proven that once in power, they govern for the benefit of all, compromise with minority positions, and pursue policies that balance the interests of capital and labor.

    Oh that's right, they nominate telegenic yes-men who rubber stamp a pre-existing agenda that inflames international tensions and entrenches white, christian, business owners disproportionately into positions of power.

  8. Re:"halfway through its second term" ? by approachingZero+ · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unless you do some research on your own and look at her very real track record of reform in Alaska, then yes she is only a soundbite politician.

    It would be more accurate to say she was a working class mother who ran for office and made changes to a state rife with cronyism. Unless you do some research on your own and look at her very real track record of reform in Alaska, then yes she is only a soundbite politician.

    She is / was a working class mother who ran for office and made changes to a state rife with cronyism.

    But she didn't have the right pedigree, and she had that funny accent, and she presented a threat to the status que, so she had to be portrayed as a caricature that the left felt politically correct to destroy.

    Some people bought into the program. 'the image she carefully projected was of the quick-thinking renegade who didn't have the time to actually read any reports or listen to advisers, but instead promised she could run a country on gut instinct and American luck'

    It's no wonder we have the Tea Party, and this year (if the IRS is held in check) things will start to change.

    Ask yourself this, what is the accepted image of the Tea Party as put forth by the media? Why is that?

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  9. You thought things would change? by macbeth66 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Really? You (schwit1) must be disappointed on a regular basis.

    Sorry, even if Obama really wanted to change things, he's still an elected. The bureaucracy marches on and very rarely cares about the comings and goings of temporary staff, even if they are the boss.

  10. Re:I appreciate that. by Sarius64 · · Score: 2

    Then I see the kids who are put into the foster care system and see how fucked up they become. Only White babies get a chance at a loving home - and even then - if they have developmental problems, all bets are off (You WILL see them on death row.).

    I am troubled.

    So full of it more likely. I had a very good friend take a crack baby into her home for foster care and fought in the courts for four years before they would finally release the child to her for adoption. Mother completely abandoned her. Father serving a life sentence for multiple murders. But the state felt they were doing her an injustice allowing a white woman to adopt a black child. That little girl is doing great now and will get a free ride at her mother's college because of employment.

    But it's much easier to bitch about (insert rant about races here) apparently than actually do something.

  11. Re:"halfway through its second term" ? by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Because Palin was a soundbite politician.

    Which politician ISN'T after the soundbite? With the media today, it's ALL about the soundbite, because they refuse to actually spend 5 min explaining what the real positions are. It takes too much time and doesn't sell advertisements.

    But I have a few sound bites for you to classify... "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. Period." "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor." "not even a smidgen of corruption" "What difference does it make" or to include the original article, "the most transparent administration in history."

    Palin wasn't exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer, but we would have been worlds better off with that administration over what we got and the headlong rush into partisan bickering that ensued.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  12. Re:Most Transparent Ever! You Right wingers! by Bodhammer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is anything critical of this administration right wing or are they so wonderful in their totality that they are like pony, butterfly farts? Anytime something is posted that is published you proglocrats look like a bunch shambling, drooling zombies. Wake up, you got snookered, get over it and open your eyes. This guy is the worst president every and you fucks need to own it and fix it...

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  13. Re:I appreciate that. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    serve : v to rule "I'd like to thank Senator Linepockets for his many decades serving us."

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  14. Re:"halfway through its second term" ? by Quila · · Score: 5, Insightful

    favoring the use of quick slogans ('Drill Baby Drill') to win over the unthinking

    "Yes we can," "Change we can believe in," "Common sense gun laws," "Most transparent administration"

  15. And now Obama threatens to veto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    a law that would simply require the president to obey the law!

    When the executive is subject to the law, you have a democracy or a republic

    When the exectuive is able to write or change the law, you have monarchy and tyranny

    I never thought the Democrats would be able to out-evil themselves in Presidents - their guy, Woodrow Wilson, was my previous bet for the absolute worst as he, among other things, segregated the US government by race (that's right, if you were educated by unionized school teachers (Democrat activists) you probably thought the US was ALWAYS segregated by race and that this ended with the civil rights act under Johnson in the 1960's). Black Amercians were always free in the northern colonies and they even participated in the Revolutionary war. The southern colonies had slaves before, during, and after the Revolutionary war (until the civil war). The Constitution DID NOT count blacks as 3/5ths of a person... it counted "non-free" persons as 3/5ths (i.e. blacks in the north were always full people and only southern slaves were 3/5ths for purposes of allocating seats in congress (to prevent southern states getting so much power in congress that they could spread slavery further)). The REAL introduction of OFFICIAL race-based segregation within the US federal government was by Democrat President Woodrow Wilson. Even on his WORST day, however, Woodrow Wilson did not imagine he was above the Constitution and could write and re-write laws on his own.

  16. If you like your transparency, by Squidlips · · Score: 3, Funny

    you can keep your transparency