Slashdot Mirror


Fly an Aerobatic Quadcopter with Curtis Youngblood (Video)

It goes up, it goes down, it goes upside down and keeps on flying. We're talking about Curtis Youngblood's latest quadcopter prototype, but as his website says, "Curtis has been flying and competing with RC Helicopters since the early 1980s and is a Multi-time World Champion and Multi-time 3D Champion." This lucky dog has managed to turn his hobby into a business; he makes and sells radio controlled helicopters -- not the $60 ones from Harbor Freight, but sophisticated aerial beasts that can carry still and video cameras and could easily be used as short-range drones, except that these are hobbyists' toys -- for hobbyists who can afford to spend hundreds and even thousands of dollars, anyway. There are plenty of quadcopter kits on the market for lots less than Youngblood's creations, along with build-it-yourself guides. But these won't fly upside down. For that, you need variable-pitch rotors and sophisticated control systems. "But what about 3-D printing?" you ask. Of *course* you can use a 3-D printer to make a quadcopter. That was an inevitable development. Here are open source instructions for building one. Enjoy the ride!

16 of 33 comments (clear)

  1. All fine until they crash on someone by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Like the chopper that crashed on top of a truck and lit four cars on fire did today in Seattle at the Space Needle.

    Think of it dropping from the sky onto a small baby when it's high up.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:All fine until they crash on someone by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Your right to drones ends when it's in recording range of me or over my property.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:All fine until they crash on someone by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      My dad lives on something like 46 acres. I grew up in places where we had anywhere from 10 to 50 acres.

      If I can see it, it's over my land.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:All fine until they crash on someone by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that's not necessarily true.

      Unless you're VERY myopic.

      I take it you've never lived in a 40+ acre tree farm.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  2. Nice advertisement Slashdot... by Bartles · · Score: 1

    ...where can I buy one?

  3. 3D Printed Drones by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Slashdot finally crossed the streams.

    1. Re:3D Printed Drones by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Wait, according to all the news and slashdot articles, the only thing that can be printed with a 3D printer is a gun.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  4. Flitetest show about quadcopter is far better by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Try this youtube video of Curtis visting the guys at Flitetest for a really great look at how it works, flying it, etc. from some guys who really know their RC stuff:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Flitetest is pretty awesome, by the way; I stumbled across their channel a couple of months ago and have been quite entertained. They're the closest thing I can think of to "Top Gear, only with remote control things that fly."

    And I do mean "things" that fly; they routinely have a "can we make ___ fly?" episodes. I think I recall one challenge involved getting a cinderblock into the air.

    1. Re:Flitetest show about quadcopter is far better by JStyle · · Score: 1

      Came here to post that. Curtis Youngblood is really quite amazing. Kinda surprised that the posted video is of what seems to be a prototype to the Stingray 500, which has been available for a little while now: http://curtisyoungblood.com/V2...

  5. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN or Robots Are My Family by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Drones aren't human.

    They are tools.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  6. Don't need collective to fly quads upside down by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 3, Informative

    At least not the smaller ones, people have built ones which brute force engine reversal and use symmetric propellers.

    http://hackaday.com/2013/11/26...

  7. This is not aerobatic at all... by reiserifick · · Score: 1

    Compared to Curtis's helicopter videos that are readily available on youtube... Interesting interview though.

  8. Re:yes, but by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    No, but it runs...awww, I can't do it.

  9. Slow news day? by felixrising · · Score: 1

    This is old.. it's been around for a while, already in multiple shops.. not even innovative.. so why is this on Slashdot? Paid Advertisement?

  10. As a quadcopter owner... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    ...one with GPS, compass, tilt sensors, and altimeter, that can carry a gopro camera and flies ultra-ultra stable, will hover quite still with zero control input anywhere I put it, pointed in any direction I choose (or pan around), hundreds of dollars worth of hardware:

    Lemme just ask. Why the heck would I want a quadcopter to fly upside down?

    I never understood the urge to fly these things crazy/stunt/ridiculous. The beauty of them is that they are ultimately capable of *stable* flight.

    If someone asked me if they could put my quad in unlocked mode and try to fly stunts with it, I'd tell them to get off my GPS-stabilized, altimeter locked lawn. Cuz' that's how I roll. Fly. Whatever.

    I just don't get it. Perhaps a fan of upside down flying can enlighten me?

    --

    Also, watching my quad fly stable as a rock... where the heck is my flying car???????????

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  11. Ahead of the news. . . by lou10itd4n · · Score: 2

    This is new. This is the MantaRay Prototype. Much larger (1230mm). O.S.105 nitro motor and 325mm blades on each half of the rotor. The Stingray (smaller) proved we could maintain stable flight with collective pitch and a single motor. 3D is just an awesome bi-product and we can turn sharper in pylon racing and event courses. Now that we know we can use a single motor, we can scale up the machine to handle larger gasoline or possibly turbine drive-trains. Imagine search and rescue or surveying with camera on a platform that can stay in the air for hours. Folding blades cause less damage than props in the event of a crash, and this will have many options for recovery. So while the machine is only as safe as the pilot, this is still a much more stable platform than anything modelers and industries have had up to this point.