Slashdot Mirror


Ex-Microsoft Employee Arrested For Leaking Windows 8

SmartAboutThings (1951032) writes "Alex Kibkalo, a former Microsoft employee has been arrested yesterday for stealing and leaking company secrets. The former software architecture engineer is accused of leaking early Windows 8 builds to a French tech blogger with whom he was communicating inside a forum. The ex-Microsoft employee also stands accused of leaking some Windows 7 program files and also an internal system meant to protect against software piracy. Kibkalo is said to have leaked the Windows 8 code in the middle of 2012 because he was angry over a poor performance review."

17 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. That makes sense by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    That makes sense. I mean, if you were driving down the road leaking botulism toxin or liposuction reclamation material, you'd get arrested...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:That makes sense by Spense4Hire · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, bad enough Microsoft has inflicted this on the public; this guy thought it was a good idea to start beating us with it *early*.

  2. Re:Stealing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A developer stole the code he was working on? How does that work?

    Because his work is not really his. It belongs to the corporation. Everything belongs to the corporation. Space, time, all matter and all energy belong to the corporation according to the corporation. They got the lawyers to make it happen. He doesn't.

  3. Re:Stealing? by cheesybagel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Work for hire. It isn't his to begin with. Plus he probably had code he did not write there too.

  4. Which is it? by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Summary says he released early builds, then it says he leaked "Windows 8 code". Code and builds aren't the same thing. So which was it?

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Which is it? by McWilde · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really. The early build is probably a lot like the release build that came after. You might see some bugs that were later fixed, but I wouldn't think it comprises any company secret. The code on the other hand is secret. And the early code will also be a lot like later code, so you could now roll your own Windows 8 from this code (if you did your own bug fixing as well).

      --
      Maybe
    2. Re:Which is it? by Threni · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It matters if you're reporting A happened and actually it was B. Yes, in both cases something happened, and we can agree perhaps that they both fall into the "bad" category. But..so what? How does that make the story more accurate?

      Oh, and "period".

  5. Apple vs Tree? by tomxor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not pedantic there's a huge difference... take your ignorance and leave.

  6. Should arrest that guy that *designed* Windows 8 by walterbyrd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another Microsoft injustice.

  7. "...he was angry over a poor performance review." by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 5, Funny

    They told him he performed like Windows 8?

  8. Re:Disgruntled Current/Former Employee Leaker by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many prefer to keep these leaks in house, lest current disgruntled employees get the -itis.

    Microsoft publicized this to demonstrate to the world that there is someone that actually wanted Windows 8.

  9. Re:Stealing? by flagg9483 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, blah, blah, corporations are evil and holding down the poor hard working honest guy. Nonsense. If I start a small corner store business making widgets, then hire you to help. I instruct you have to make my widgets, give you the tools and material to do it, pay you as we agreed, then you steal my inventory and give/sell it to someone then you are a THIEF. Just because it is software doesn't make it belong to you, and just because it is a corporation doesn't give you moral superiority.

  10. Copyright or Trade Secret? Pick One by organgtool · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On Slashdot, we often talk about how ridiculous it is that software is covered by copyright AND patents, but no one addresses the fact that source code is also covered under trade secret law. This is a conflict of interest and shows how screwed up our intellectual property system is. The intent of copyright is that you get protection in return for making your works public. But in the case of source code, companies get all of the protections of copyright law on that code without being required to ever actually release the code to the public. That is made evident by this exact case.

    Don't get me wrong - I'm not suggesting that every software development company should be forced to release its code, but I do think they should have to choose between receiving copyright protection by releasing the code or receive no copyright protection and keep the code guarded by trade secret. I can't think of any other industry that gets protection from both copyright and trade secret and I haven't heard anyone suggest why software should be made an exception.

    1. Re:Copyright or Trade Secret? Pick One by organgtool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are confusing patent law and copyright law.

      No I am not. Patents and copyright were BOTH set up for the purpose of encouraging people to release their work.

      The intention of copyright law is that you write things.

      No, the intention of copyright law is to encourage people to make their works available to the public by motivating the creator with the power of monetization. It's the ARTS in the constitutional clause "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts".

      There is nothing wrong with writing things and keeping them secret.

      Of course not. But if you want a monopoly on a body of work, you are supposed to actually release that work, not sit on it.

  11. Re:Stealing? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The developer stole nothing, one element necessary for theft is intentionally depriving the owner of their property and the owner was never deprived of their property. This is conversion

    In an interesting sense, you are technically correct because the owner is not being deprived of anything. The owner, Microsoft, still has the code and is thus deprived of nothing. This fits better under industrial espionage law. Unfortunately, case law precedent makes it possible to prosecute the actor under theft statutes.

    Theft of secrets. Yes, the original blueprints, code, whatever, remains with the original owner. What has been stolen, however, was the exclusivity of the trade secrets. And trade secrets are only protected as long as they are secret.

    This being Windows, 8, probably the most applicable route to prosecution is Illegal Disposal of Toxic Waste, but nevertheless...

  12. Whistle-blower? by slapout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was he trying to warn the world how bad Windows 8 was?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  13. Re:Stealing? by HairOfTheBambit · · Score: 4, Informative

    The employer is paying the software developer for the work he's doing while he is there. If you want to have your work licensed, free lance, and then license your code. Do it without the tools and time and resources provided by an employer during working hours. There are lots of projects and people who do this. Specify it in the contracts you create.

    I've been in all the different stages. Started out as a developer for companies, went to independent contractor, started my own business and hiring programmers who work under me. I am paying them for their time and their skills and their creative talent, and the result of their work. Why is a programmer more entitled to something than a welder? Because one is using creativity in their brain? Then how about an engineer designing bridges or planes or cars? Should they have everything they do be licensed also?

    A company that wants to keep the best and most creative people offer good benefits, the right tools and appropriate salaries. Some may get stock or profit sharing. These are the rewards, payment, for the services rendered. Now, the one point I will make is that things you do on your own time (at home, after hours, on vacation) should most certainly belong to you. I remember a case where some big company said something the engineer did on their own time belonged to them, and I find that rather repugnant.