The Myth of the Science and Engineering Shortage
walterbyrd (182728) writes in with this story that calls into question the conventional wisdom that there is a shortage of science and engineering workforce in the U.S. "Such claims are now well established as conventional wisdom. There is almost no debate in the mainstream. They echo from corporate CEO to corporate CEO, from lobbyist to lobbyist, from editorial writer to editorial writer. But what if what everyone knows is wrong? What if this conventional wisdom is just the same claims ricocheting in an echo chamber? The truth is that there is little credible evidence of the claimed widespread shortages in the U.S. science and engineering workforce."
A programmer.
We had plenty of qualified workers back in, say, 1997 when the internet first boomed.
The economy was strong as ever.
Can't we just pretend it is 1997 again?
If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
I think you'll find that defining "properly" in this context runs into the same critique you made about "shortage".
There's no clear distinction between design and code any more
Looking at the code produced by the agile teams here, this is unfortunately too true :(
I wonder... maybe that's why you don't see a lot of ninja proctologists out there.
...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
...so that puts a plumber ahead of a programmer in terms of genuine credentials. A plumber is more like an engineer in this regard than a programmer is.
That certain special faction of the peanut gallery will just LOVE that. '-)
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.