Slashdot Mirror


The Highest-Flying Wind Turbine

Daniel_Stuckey writes: "In far-flung rural Alaska, where electricity can cost as much as $1 per kilowatt hour — more than 10 times the national average, according to the New York Times — a wind turbine encased in a giant helium balloon is about to break a world record. The Bouyant Air Turbine (BAT) is about to be floated 1,000 feet into the air in the name of cleaner, cheaper, and mobile energy. That single airborne grouper—it's sort of a hybrid of a blimp, a kite, and a turbine—will power over a dozen homes. The BAT is the brainchild of Altaeros, a company founded by MIT alumni, and, if everything goes according to plan, it's going to be the highest-flying power generator in history. Since winds blow stronger and more consistently the higher above the ground you go, and the hovering BAT harnesses that gale and sends electricity down to earth through the high-strength tethers that also hold the machine steady. "

9 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Helium by Kardos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This can never scale due to helium scarcity. While even low-quality helium would undoubtedly work for this application, the quantities required to build these at scale would drive the price through the roof.

    1. Re:Helium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While Hydrogen is significantly more dangerous, depending on the overall cost and possible ways to limit the dangers, it may be an option.

    2. Re:Helium by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Informative
      You're correct about the helium scarcity, but a wind sail generator such as this could probably be modified to produce it's own heated air to stay aloft, a technology already in widespread use in ballooning.

      If you check out one article this week, make it this one... these things are crafty cool.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Helium by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While Hydrogen is significantly more dangerous ...

      These are unmanned. So even if a tiny fraction burn up (due to lightning or whatever), I don't see how that would be much of a problem. Hydrogen burns very quickly, so would be consumed before it hit the ground. Just make sure they are tethered so they don't fall on a populated area.

    4. Re:Helium by skovnymfe · · Score: 5, Funny

      There must be somewhere in Alaska where there aren't any people around. There must be.

    5. Re:Helium by IJ+Hull · · Score: 5, Informative

      Search for "hydrogen cooled electrical generator" .. you statement 'Hydrogen and electrical generation generally do not mix' is really really wrong. Don't like giving GE free adds, but.. http://www.ge-energy.com/produ...

    6. Re:Helium by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While Hydrogen is significantly more dangerous ...

      These are unmanned. So even if a tiny fraction burn up (due to lightning or whatever), I don't see how that would be much of a problem. Hydrogen burns very quickly, so would be consumed before it hit the ground. Just make sure they are tethered so they don't fall on a populated area.

      Just add a parachute pack lashed to the bottom. The balloon burns, the weight causes the parachute to rotate to above the falling structure and an altimeter deploys the parachute before it hits the ground.

      You could make this pretty reliable if you separate the hydrogen lifting cells from the turbine/parachute system so an incineration would just involve attaching new balloons and sending the whole thing back up.

  2. Re:hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No. It didn't occur to ANY of those MIT alumni, their backers, their consultants, or anyone.

    You are literally the first person to mention it.

    They'd be f***ed without slashdot.

  3. Re:About to break a world record! by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is the ISS flying? Nope. It's not lighter than air either. Apples & Oranges.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.