Microsoft Promises Not To Snoop Through Email
An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft took some much-deserved flack last week for admitting they examined the emails of a Hotmail user who received some leaked Windows 8 code. The company defended their actions at the time. Now, after hearing the backlash, Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith says they will not do so in the future. Instead, they'll refer it to law enforcement. He wrote, 'It's always uncomfortable to listen to criticism. But if one can step back a bit, it's often thought-provoking and even helpful. That was definitely the case for us over the past week. Although our terms of service, like those of others in our industry, allowed us to access lawfully the account in this case, the circumstances raised legitimate questions about the privacy interests of our customers. ...As a company we've participated actively in the public discussions about the proper balance between the privacy rights of citizens and the powers of government. We've advocated that governments should rely on formal legal processes and the rule of law for surveillance activities. While our own search was clearly within our legal rights, it seems apparent that we should apply a similar principle and rely on formal legal processes for our own investigations involving people who we suspect are stealing from us.'"
Translation: "Sorry we got caught. We'll be more careful to not get caught next time."
Wasn't scaremongering about Google reading your email part of their stupid ad campaign?
If Microsoft could read, couldn't they also inject crafted evidence into his account? Might be a nice way to take down opposition...
"No, but understanding is not required, only obedience."
I'm not!
"thought-provoking"? How was it even a question?
If they had a problem seeing the problem in the first place then I don't trust them to see the problem in the future.
Incorrect
Incorrect correction, jackass.
Try reading the article you link to before hitting "Post" next time, me.
An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
T-800: "I swear I will not kill anyone."
Yeah, right!
How about they build an encryption API right into their service? Encrypt the message locally before it ever goes to the network. Oh, they don't want to do that. I see. So Microsoft promises to not read your mail, while retaining the ability to easily do so whenever it's convenient for them. That makes me feel so much better.
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
Microsoft != Facebook
Ok...
Right! That's right! Facebook is a software giant that snoops through your stuff. Microsoft is... is...
Waaaait a minute...
Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
I'm gonna sleep naked from now on. That's gonna teach them, go blind, bastards!
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
No, it's exactly the point. Because how many mail folders did they go through before finding the "right" one? Do you think if they did that we'd ever hear about just how many mailboxes they opened without the consent of the content owner and violated their privacy? Do you think it's ok that a company (not even a government, but a mere, ordinary COMPANY) should get away with digging through your emails at a hunch? We think you might have done something we don't like, so we simply dig through your belongings, to hell with your privacy, to hell with how you feel about some strangers digging through your stuff, we do what we WANNA.
What's next? Your landlord opening your home with a key he retained because he heard a rumor that you might have gotten visits from a drug dealer, so he simply marches over at 6am, opens your door, digs through your clothing and your sex tox collection then shrugs when he doesn't find anything and goes without even a "whoopsie, sorry"?
That's ok, too, I guess?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
I realize in the modern world it's impossible to not do business with MS, but I can move in that direction. I will do so now because two recent events show the nature of the company.
As most of you know, Bill Gates (who now claims to be sort-of detached from his company) came out against Snowden. He used a fake argument, so the motive must be money - money from the government taking from the people.
And now, of course, we know MS thinks nothing of perusing private emails. Although this may be allowed in the fine print of the TOS, it's not the part of the advertised-image MS projects, and MS's repeated defense that doing so was within the law won't help it on the ethical front.
I know many of you have serious monetary disputes with MS, and that is where your MS-disdain springs from. I previously ignored those disputes because I was too lazy to learn the details. But I see your point now without going into the details. A monster company with no ethics is a true monster.
(||) Nehmo (||)