Slashdot Mirror


NSA Confirms It Has Been Searching US Citizens' Data Without a Warrant

Charliemopps writes: "According to Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, 'There have been queries, using U.S. person identifiers, of communications lawfully acquired to obtain foreign intelligence targeting non-U.S. persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States. These queries were performed pursuant to minimization procedures approved by the Fisa court and consistent with the statute and the fourth amendment.' Basically, if you communicated with someone that is 'reasonably believed' to be a terrorist, you've lost constitutional protection against searches without a warrant, according to the NSA."

6 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    wtf is up with the auto-play read-out loud BS? It's like being waterboarded with "beta" feature. Make it stop.

  2. Re:OK, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... what is their definition of a terrorist?

    If you are being suspected that makes you a terrorist. With this definition everything works out.

  3. Re:April Fools? by HeckRuler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A little depressing, but it's getting hard to tell.

  4. Re:April Fools? by HermMunster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whether they are joking or not, regardless of their claims, the activity of the NSA is a violation of the constitution. It matters not what the FISA court says or what they believe it should be. It is a civil rights violation and they have been breaking the law. Without a warrant any collection of data is a violation of the 4th amendment. The purpose behind the 4th amendment was to stop general warrants, of which, the NSA activities qualify.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  5. Re:OK, but... by manu0601 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone that disagrees with power. Americans fighting UK army for independance would probably be called terrorists by today's standard.

  6. Re:April Fools? by cffrost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And plus, they were doing it to protect us from [spooky voice]TEEERRROOORRRIIISSSTTTSSS[/spooky voice]. Everything is ok so long as you are doing it to fight [spooky voice]TEEERRROOORRRIIISSSTTTSSS[/spooky voice], right?

    My only fear with regard to "terrorism" — excluding the conversion of my country into a totalitarian police/surveillance state (as I consider this to be a realization rather than a fear) — manifests itself along the lines of: "I hope that steroid-fueled, combat-ready, bored cop over there doesn't think up an excuse to harass/question/search/detain/arrest/chem-spray/electrocute/beat/pop me, as he's all jacked-up to 'fight terror,' and there aren't any terrorists around to be fought (but I am), and I'm nine times more likely to be killed by a cop than killed by one of the elusive boogeymen the government seems to want me to fear."

    --
    Thank you, Edward Snowden.

    "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan