Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Solve the Mystery of Why Zebras Have Stripes

Hugh Pickens DOT Com (2995471) writes "There have been many explanations for the zebra's impressive stripes including Darwin who thought that the stripes help males and females make sensible choices about whom they mate with. Now Henry Nicholls reports at The Guardian that Tim Caro at the University of California, Davis, has taken a completely original approach, stepping back from one species of zebra and attempting to account for the differences in patterning across different species and subspecies of zebras, horses and asses to see if there is anything about the habitat or ecology of these different equids that hints at the function of stripes. To answer that question, Caro and his colleagues created a detailed map charting the ranges of striped vs. non-striped species and subspecies. Then they worked on a map for the bloodsuckers that targeted those species — specifically, abanid biting flies (horse flies) and tsetse flies.

'I was amazed by our results,' says Caro. 'Again and again, there was greater striping on areas of the body in those parts of the world where there was more annoyance from biting flies.' Where there are tsetse flies, for instance, the equids tend to come in stripes. Where there aren't, they don't. Biologists who buy into the bug-repellent hypothesis say that, all other things being equal, striped animals would have an evolutionary advantage because they wouldn't suffer from the loss of blood, reduced weight gain and lowered milk production that's associated with bug bites. Tsetse flies are also associated with the transmission of diseases. 'There are a lot of them, such as sleeping sickness, equine anemia and equine influenza,' Caro says. Why would zebras evolve to have stripes whereas other hooved mammals did not? The study found that, unlike other African hooved mammals living in the same areas as zebras, zebra hair is shorter than the mouthpart length of biting flies, so zebras may be particularly susceptible to annoyance by biting flies. 'It's clear that the flies can get through that hair and get to the skin.'"

18 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Cite your Refs by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, this is why very few referees suffer from fly bites? I always wondered.

  2. Terrible summary by timholman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, if you're going to just copy and paste part of the article as your summary, you might as well post the last paragraph, and get to the actual explanation:

    Zebras have stripes because biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

    1. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Terrible summary by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      If it's proven that biting flies have aversion to landing on striped surfaces, it makes no sense to say it can't be true because flies would evolve. One should rather ask "Why didn't flies evolve past this limitation?"

      One could start with various hypotheses like:
      - It's a behavior that protects them from something. Maybe the advantage of biting zebras has a lesser weight than the disadvantage of losing that protection.
      - It's a behavior that's consequence of something they can't evolve past without not being flies anymore. Maybe their eyes are not able to know the distance of a striped surface with the required precision, for whatever physical reasons, and better eyes would be too expensive.

    3. Re:Terrible summary by kruach+aum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can evolve, but they have evolved to a local maximum where they can't determine whether visual information received indicates a zebra, mud, or water. As they seem to be thriving at this level, there is no pressure for them to evolve the required discriminatory abilities.

    4. Re:Terrible summary by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Biting flies, like the zebra, certainly do evolve... typically at a much faster rate than large mammals.

      That would make the idea of evolving insect repellent coloring even more amazing.

      For proof like in the pudding, the biting flies would have to be shown to exert selection pressure on zebras that is not present where equines without stripes flourish.

      It could be the striped coat offers an amalgam of advantages. Hindering attacks from predators trying to pick out a single quarry in a sea of seizure-inducing undulating stripes should not be considered mutually exclusive from hindering insect bites.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:Terrible summary by davewoods · · Score: 5, Funny

      better eyes would be too expensive.

      They simply ran out of evolution points when they were rolling their species.

    6. Re:Terrible summary by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      If it's proven that biting flies have aversion to landing on striped surfaces, it makes no sense to say it can't be true because flies would evolve.

      Correlation != causation.

      To me it makes much more sense that biting flies have evolved to avoid landing on Zebras (eg. because Zebras have a secret anti-fly weapon we don't know about yet).

      How do they know to avoid Zebras? Because of the stripes.

      Carts and horses. Make sure you know which is which...

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:Terrible summary by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

      Biting flies can't evolve?

      I found the whole thing very unconvincing.

      For biting flies to evolve, there would likely have to be a considerable reason to, such as zebras being their only source to lay eggs. Chances are their ecosystem was hardly impacted at all by zebra evolution due to diversity.

      As evidenced, zebras did evolve due to considerable reasons, as their short hair made them rather specific targets for the flies above many other animals.

      Thankfully, evolution does require considerable justification. Questionable mutations would evolve otherwise, and we should be thankful it's not a knee-jerk reaction in nature, no matter how much we would like to prove it actually exists to those who refuse to acknowledge it on every level.

    8. Re:Terrible summary by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3

      Assuming the statistical analysis is correct, I will give the answer:

      As the fly flies by, the alternate dark and light banding confuses the fly into thinking it is the moving shadows of some threat from overhead, like a hungry bird.

      Go write a paper and list me as lead.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    9. Re:Terrible summary by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget complexity of the change required.

      Flies eyes are segmented and see completely different to us. It could be that there's some sort of visual effect of stripes and segmented eyes.

      Evolving stripes is much easier than evolving a different kind of eye or vision system.

    10. Re:Terrible summary by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 4, Insightful

      very unconvincing... wouldnt it be easier to grow your hair a few mm longer?

      What's to say that didn't happen? We just don't call the ones with longer hair instead of stripes "zebras".

      Evolution doesn't involve a species voting on how it would prefer to evolve. If there are multiple possible adaptations then it's entirely possible that different subgroups will evolve in different directions in response to the same environmental factors. This is one path to speciation, if the change are significant enough.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    11. Re:Terrible summary by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, the flies just move on to the millions of other herd animals around without stripes.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  3. Important Quote from Article by Grantbridge · · Score: 5, Informative

    Relevant quotes missing from summary:

    "researchers built horse mannequins, painted them in a variety of patterns, coated them with sticky stuff, and found that horseflies seemed to avoid landing on the fake horses that were painted with black and white stripes."

    "The proposed explanation was that the flies preferred to land on dark surfaces. Such surfaces reflect the kind of polarized light that reminds the flies of the water or mud where they breed. Light surfaces aren't as attractive, but dark-and-light patterns are even worse — perhaps because such patterns confuse the flies' navigational sense."

  4. I thought it was for predators... by YalithKBK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought the stripes broke up the outlines of individuals and made it harder for predators to single one out of a crowd? Or did no actual research go into that claim?

    1. Re:I thought it was for predators... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nope, it seems that predators are not a threat to zebras, and it's all about flies.

      There's no such implication in the article.

      The question is not "Why are zebras camoflauged?" but "Why do zebras have stripes?"

      As an AC below has suggsted:

      as stripless equine species also had predators to deal with but not the flies the flies are the more plausible answer. the effects against predators are therefor likely to be a secondary benefit, and could have caused zebra's to have evolved into forming larger groups then most other animals their size to take advantage of that.

      --

      I cant wait for the next "science" article here on slashdot.

      And I can't wait for the next hastily ill-informed, condescendingly dismissive post in reply to that article.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  5. Hypothesized in 1982 by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Zebra stripes have traditionally been thought of as an adaptation against detection by vertebrate predators such as lions and hyaenas. A different hypothesis is suggested: that the stripes are an adaptation against visually orienting biting flies and act by obliterating the stimulus presented by a large dark form, which is important in host-finding by many Diptera. This hypothesis is supported by some indirect evidence, and by a field experiment in Zimbabwe in which biting fly catches were compared on moving and stationary black, white and striped models. Striped models caught significantly fewer tsetse (Glossina morsitans) Westwood and other flies (including tabanids) than solid black or white models, but this difference was much reduced in the presence of olfactory attractants.

    ~Waage, J. K. (1981)

    Maybe people studying zebras should start by reading the zebra wikipedia page.

  6. Re:Correlation? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Have these scientists demonstrated something about flies vision that the stripes interfere with?

    That much has already been shown to be the case - or at least, that flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.

    I had heard the theory that zebra striping was a kind of dazzle camouflage [wikipedia.org] which confused larger predators when trying to pick out one animal to pursue.

    It can, of course, be both.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.