Slashdot Mirror


Expert Warns: Civilian World Not Ready For Massive EMP-Caused Blackout

schwit1 (797399) writes "An electromagnetic pulse is a burst of electromagnetic energy strong enough to disable, and even destroy, nearby electronic devices. In the first few minutes of an EMP, nearly half a million people would die. That's the worst-case scenario that author William R. Forstchen estimated would be the result of an EMP on the electric grid. 'If you do a smart plan — the Congressional EMP Commission estimated that you could protect the whole country for about $2 billion,' Peter Vincent Pry, executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and director of the U.S. Nuclear Strategy Forum, told Watchdog.org. 'That's what we give away in foreign aid to Pakistan every year.' He said the more officials plan, the lower the estimated cost gets. 'The problem is not the technology,' Pry said. 'We know how to protect against it. It's not the money, it doesn't cost that much. The problem is the politics. It always seems to be the politics that gets in the way.'"

21 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Actual thought process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Reading summary: this seems pretty stupid and a little fear-mongery for slashdot.

    Click link: Fox news, figures. Usual shit reporting and lack of detail. Obamacare not mentioned anywhere in article.

    Click link in article to watchdog.org: not much more detail, more zomg fear crap, still no mention of obamacare.

    Read comments on watchdog.org: ok, I’m out

    Not saying there isn’t something to talk about here, but linking to fox news for this kind of topic is like linking to a local news report on heartbleed. We aren’t the audience for this level of reporting.

    1. Re:Actual thought process by Collective+0-0009 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mod this AC up. WTF /.?????? Some article about devastating effects of EMP and an easy preventative measure (that I wanted to read about). But the links are to foxnews.com and watchdog.org!!!! There is no content!

      Would people stop using /. and start using soylentnews.org, please!?!? I can't take this anymore!

      --
      I finally updated my sig, but now it's lame.
    2. Re:Actual thought process by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mod this AC up. WTF /.?????? Some article about devastating effects of EMP and an easy preventative measure (that I wanted to read about). But the links are to foxnews.com and watchdog.org!!!! There is no content!

      Would people stop using /. and start using soylentnews.org, please!?!? I can't take this anymore!

      The watchdog.org site has links to the actual paper referenced (the link in the text called estimated).

    3. Re:Actual thought process by Anrego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would presume parent is making jest of the excessively biased Fox News and the somewhat biased Watchdog News. Usually they try to at least work in a halfhearted jab against Obama. I too was waiting for the "and here is why Obama is to blame" punchline as soon as I saw the source of the article.

      Anyway, I agree with other posters. This article is aimed at stirring up fear within their demographic, not technical discussion. If you drill down far enough there is a much better article that probably should have been directly linked.

    4. Re:Actual thought process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are crazy man! Not only you RTFA but you even click links! Guys, bring in the pitchforks!

  2. Re:linking to fox news? by Barny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, to be fair, at this point a link to the onion would enhance the credibility of the article.

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  3. Country not ready for huge asteroid or Godzilla by deadweight · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just happen to sell asteroid repellent and giant lizard repellent. If you order before midnight, you can get some ginsu knives too.

  4. Re:One word: FUD by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    I like the statement that, in the worst case scenario, 500,000 people would die in the first half hour.

    That amazes me. I would think that even in 2014, it would take a couple of hours before people went into a terminal heart rhythm because they couldn't log on to Facebook. Maybe I'm just old and slow...

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. What's the range of an EMP? by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know it would vary based on the yield of the nuke and the relative shielding of the device, but let's say...

    1) "Rogue" small-yield nuke detonated at ground-level (eg, snuck onto a shipping container or other similar delivery).

    2) Standard-size ICBM delivered to target intended for ground destruction.

    3) Standard sized ICBM delivered for maximum EMP yield.

    Can you use a single nuke to EMP the entire continental US?

    What kind of shielding is necessary to block EMPs? Is my TV in the top floor of my house junk but maybe my PC in the basement likely unaffected? Is there a shared risk from the electric grid?

    1. Re:What's the range of an EMP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      A solar generated EMP is not a threat to your house wiring. It is only a threat to wiring that is many miles long - i.e. the commercial power grid. It will induce large currents in the grid, that will travel to your house as (I assume) your house is connected to the grid. As disconnecting your house from the grid is (I assume) not a valid solution, the answer must be protecting the grid.

    2. Re:What's the range of an EMP? by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      "It produced a yield equivalent to 1.4 megatons of TNT."

      "The Starfish Prime electromagnetic pulse also made those effects known to the public by causing electrical damage in Hawaii, about 1,445 kilometres (898 mi) away from the detonation point, knocking out about 300 streetlights, setting off numerous burglar alarms and damaging a telephone company microwave link. The EMP damage to the microwave link shut down telephone calls from Kauai to the other Hawaiian islands"

  6. It always seems to be the politics... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This will be the epitaph of our civilization.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  7. Half a million in minutes? by feedayeen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The people who die in the first few minutes are going to be those who's lives are dependent on technology. That's list contains almost exclusively those in planes and those dependent on medical devices. How's a power grid update going to protect those people? Hospitals already have backup generators and you can't do anything about fried equipment.

  8. How Exactly by medv4380 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TFA is kinda small on any details, but what do you expect from Fox News. How exactly does 2 Billion "protect" everyone from an EMP weapon? Have we found something as good a what we currently use, but won't break? Old Vacuum tubes are a nice protection against a system that could go down, but you never want it to go down. You can't really use the good vacuum tubes ether so you're stuck in 1940's tech for a lot of stuff. How exactly does this 2 Billion stop the pace makers from breaking, the planes from falling, and every hospital patient from dying in those few initial hours. That money might help for long term protection by setting up a process to recover from such an event, but I don't really see anything that says it will protect us from the massive initial death toll.

  9. Re:One word: FUD by Megane · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't forget the people living on a... um... "government income", who suddenly won't be able to watch Jerry Springer or Dr. Oz or other fine examples of daytime television programming. Once their big-screen TV set shuts down, you know the first thing they're going to do is grab a large kitchen knife and go on a rampage killing everyone in the neighborhood.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  10. Re:One word: FUD by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And why would trucks stop coming into the city?
    Oh, right becasue idiots think an EMP would stop most vehicles from running.
    Next time you tin foil hat friends mention it, be sure to inform them that only 3% would ahve any effect at all, and only a smalle number of those would lead to a situation where a crash could occur.

    So, basically, we would be in 1910 for about a month, then 1920, within a year everyone would have power again.

    Would people die? yes/ Would civilization collapse? no. The internet would be running at some capacity through the whole thing.

    The biggest risk is that all these ignorant survivalist cause people to panic becasue of all the FUD that have been spreading.

    http://www.empcommission.org/d...

    Of course, this also mean it would need to be strong enough to impact that entire continent; which one could be, coming form the Sun.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. The Book by Tteddo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So I read the book that guy wrote and while it was entertaining and probably accurate, it still came off as advocating giving billions to defense contractors for some unspecified fix. The forward by Newt Gingrich kinda tipped me off.

  12. Re:One word: FUD by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because of metal shielding and short wires, basic electronics 101 stuff here.

    The EMP power required to take out a modern car's Ignition system and ECM would be so high that you would DIE from the radiation. Cars also are the single most noisy power environment so the ECM is already hardened from the 2000 mini EMPs per minute that are being created under the hood of the car as it drives down the road.

    I have directly experienced an EMP that is 90,000 times greater than anything the SUN can create, it's called a direct lightning strike. several electronic systems were blown out like TV sets that were connected to an ANTENNA. but the car in the garage that was the closest to the EMP was just fine. Same with the motorcycle and the other car in the driveway. How close was the EMP? 8 feet from the garage, it split the tree in 1/2 and burned a track down the center of it.

    But that is first hand experience, if you have any kind of electronics education you will also know that even a Nuclear bomb generated EMP will only affect systems that are interconnected by miles of wire. so yes, all the power grids will go down as well as all the telecommunications systems that are still wire based. There is a lot of bullshit floating around the internet about the EMP and how it is a super uber technology killer. it's not. and even if there was a chance of a really big one, it's trivial to protect equipment from them.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  13. TSA-like Money for Fear by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We're not ready for a massive EMP... or a 500 mile high Tsunami... or Giant radioactive lizards that breath fire. I love the quote though, "In the first few minutes of an EMP, nearly half a million people would die." Well, if we're talking about an EMP that could take out the entire US including airspace, that might be true of planes falling from the sky and trains running off the rails. But that scenario isn't even remotely plausible outside total nuclear annihilation. Further, Hurrican Katrina showed that even an EMP hitting a major city is really nothing more than a power outage. Flooding happens to be the most dangerous natural disaster in reach of major cities (short of Hawaii blowing up or California splitting in half). Unless the results of an EMP are dams breaking in some Superman: The Movie kind of way, we wouldn't even see a Katrina level disaster.

    Frankly, I could care less about an EMP. Any number of computer viruses could disable more machines than an EMP. And a radioactive dirty bomb is a real threat to life for decades. Any terrorist that could cause an explosion capable of triggering a sufficiently large EMP would find that the bomb itself would be more useful against a soft civilian target. An EMP is just flat out impractical for a terrorist, who prefers simple and direct and terrifying.

    On the other hand, if we're worried about a bad actor like North Korea, I believe such an EMP that could hit multiple US cities at once would trigger a nuclear response from the US. What are we going to do, waste resources wrapping electronics in shielding for... an unwarranted fear? And $2 Billion sounds desperately low. It's like the TSA, only even more incredibly useless.

    --
    I8-D
    1. Re:TSA-like Money for Fear by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

      We're not ready for a massive EMP... or a 500 mile high Tsunami... or Giant radioactive lizards that breath fire.

      Unlike the other two, an EMP event that could damage or destroy most electronic equipment within 1,000 mils of it can be created by most any nuclear power on the planet. A growing number of those nuclear powers are either unstable, hostile, or both, towards the US and the West. Iran is probably next on the list to have that capability.

      that scenario isn't even remotely plausible outside total nuclear annihilation.

      You've just stated you completely fail to understand the nature of EMP. The most dangerous EMP event is a large nuclear warhead exploded high above the ground, too high to do any meaningful damage on the ground. The damage is caused by the electromagnetic radiation released from the blast as EMP. It only takes one explosion. That isn't a nuclear Armageddon. It is returning a major post-industrial computer based society to a horse and wagon based economy in seconds, without having the horses and wagons to do the work not to mention the computers, computer controlled vehicles (engines), and other electronics.

      Further, Hurrican Katrina showed that even an EMP hitting a major city is really nothing more than a power outage.

      Hurricane Katrina was a hurricane, not EMP. EMP would have resulted in a power outage and fried electronics in cars, computers, and just about anywhere else they are used. Imagine that happening across a 2,000 mile stretch of the US at the same time.

      Frankly, I could care less about an EMP.

      Just about the only correct thing you wrote.

      Any number of computer viruses could disable more machines than an EMP.

      No, not even close. And you can reload a PC from CD/DVD if it gets hit by a virus. Try that after EMP has fried the microprocessor.

      You're strongly opinionated and pretty much completely wrong on the facts and policy.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  14. Just don't let cupboards go bare ... by perpenso · · Score: 3, Informative

    After all, you can never be too careful, right?

    Do you realize what careful is? For example when living in earthquake country believing that three days of supplies as recommended by the government is optimistic. So you buy three cases (adjust for family size) of bottled water rather than one, and as you use one case through normal activity you replace it so you always have 2-3 on hand. For your cupboard you purchase six cans (adjust for family size) of a particular canned good you use, when you get down to three you purchase three more, that way you always have 3-6 on hand. Do so each for canned chile, soup, peaches ... whatever you normally use. Similar story with dry goods, 1-2 boxes on hand, snack foods, etc. 1-2 packages of toilet paper. 1-2 boxes of plastic garbage bags on hand, toilet liners if water is out. 1-2 packages of batteries for some LED flashlights. A basic first aid kit with antiseptic, gauzes, tape, bandaids, aspirin/tylenol, etc; no wilderness self-surgery kit necessary. If a disaster occurs eat what is in your refrigerator first, then your freezer, then your canned goods. You can have a week or two of food just by not letting your cupboard go bare. Nothing special or exotic needed, no freeze dried food good for years necessary. No special gear beyond what a boy scout might take on a weekend camping trip is necessary.

    Pretty much all you need is the stuff you normally buy and use anyway. You just don't let inventories get to zero.