Slashdot Mirror


Groove Basin: Quest For the Ultimate Music Player

An anonymous reader writes "Andrew Kelley was a big fan of the Amarok open source music player. But a few years ago, its shortcomings were becoming more annoying and the software's development path no longer matched with the new features he wanted. So he did what any enterprising hacker would do: he started work on a replacement. Three and a half years later, his project, Groove Basin, has evolved into a solid music player, and it's still under active development. Kelley has now posted a write-up of his development process, talking about what problems he encountered, how he solved them, and how he ended up contributing code to libav."

7 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. Winamp by ichthus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get an old copy, because it still whips the llama's ass.

    --
    sig: sauer
  2. Clementine by Atmchicago · · Score: 5, Informative
    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

  3. Genres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stupid name. Reminds me of an old lady or a fruit. Neither is very appealing.

    Whelp, at least we know what kind of porn you're not watching.

    :-P

  4. Re:Really? by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some people like to keep their interests neatly divided.

    Personally, when I open my music player, I want to see only songs, not videos or what have you. And I want to see them divided by folders, not by artist, by album, genre or whatever. Folders are way easier to organize - at least for those of us that kept a fairly organized selection from the start. So my (admittedly retro) software bundle of choice is Dolphin > Totem. Extremely simple and with a fairly clean interface, just the way I want it. I think I'm in a small niche, though.

  5. Foobar2000 for Linux by nowsharing · · Score: 3

    The Ultimate Music Player would be a solid port of Foobar2000 to Linux. Groove Basin...not so much.

  6. Re:aimp winamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    You got the bad one, Winamp 2.95 was the good one.

    When they upgraded to 3.0 it go too bloated and slow. I can start up that Winamp and its footprint is so small you would be surprised, running with an 8MB MP3 loaded and it still took up less than 10 MB. I can run Solitaire on my PC and listen to music and the card game is a bigger resource hog.

    It was around 3.0 when AOL bought it and required they throw in everything but the kitchen sink and bloat it that it died.

  7. Re:No thanks...dev making decisions for the user by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Informative

    eedjit.

    The player analyses each track so that all songs are uniformly loud, not that it alters your volume setting. This is so, if you have 2 tracks playing next to each other - the first quiet, the second mastered to be loud - you won't hurt yourself if you turned up the volume to hear the first one ok.