Slashdot Mirror


Japanese and Swiss Watchmakers Scoff At Smartwatches

jfruh (300774) writes "With rumors swirling about Apple entering the wearable space with an iWatch, you'd think that the Japanese and Swiss companies that have dominated high-end watchmaking for more than a century would be scrambling to catch up. But there were virtually no smartwatches on display at the Baselworld trade fair, and the watchmaking giants had no plans to produce any. Company representatives seemed sure that people in practice would be uninterested in constantly recharging their watches and downloading software updates just to tell time."

4 of 399 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Maybe they should ask corded phone manufacturer by NewWorldDan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with that assumption is that a watch isn't a timepiece. At least upscale watches aren't timepieces, exactly. They're principally jewelry. And much like Rolex never made a calculator watch, don't expect them to make a smart watch either. In any event, I don't see much advantage to being an early adopter in this space. Their customers aren't banging down the door asking for a smart watch. The people I know who have smart watches so far are not your typical watch customer.

  2. Style by McGruber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But there were virtually no smartwatches on display at the Baselworld trade fair, and the watchmaking giants had no plans to produce any.

    That's because they understand that good taste never goes out of style.

  3. Re:Maybe they should ask corded phone manufacturer by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    10 years from now there won't be watches without some sort of connectivity except for specialty pieces designed from the outset to satisfy luddites.

    Bullshit. Not everybody wants a smart watch. That doesn't make you a luddite ... you may in fact be a fan of time pieces.

    I have a couple of skeleton watches, meaning you can see through the watch face to the actual gears and mechanical bits of the watch.

    The aesthetics of the watch itself is the point. Just because someone doesn't feel the need to use every shiny bauble and gew gaw the tech industry comes up with doesn't make them a luddite.

    I'm completely surrounded by electronics and technology already, and I don't see a smart watch as being something I'm particularly interested in. In fact, it's something I can't see the point of for me ... I don't text enough to need to have it constantly attached to me, any more than I can't be away from my phone (which I refuse to buy a data plan for, because wifi covers my needs). I also don't need Apple (or whoever) to be able to track every little I thing I do throughout my day.

    If you think the big name watch makers all need to get on board with this or die, you're overly fetishizing technology. There will always be a market for mechanical watches. You really think suddenly nobody is going to want to own a Rolex because there exist smartwatches? If you do, you don't know anything about people who buy watches.

    Some people still have plain old-fashioned analog sex too, and haven't embraced teledildonics. And, thankfully, most of us never will.

    For many of us, technology is a tool, but not the be all and end all of our existence. Knowing when to draw the line and walk away from it doesn't make you a luddite, it means you have a better perspective on shit that really matters.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  4. Re:Maybe they should ask corded phone manufacturer by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is a warmth to the time on an analog time piece.