Slashdot Mirror
Pirate Bay Sports-Content Uploader Faces $32m Lawsuit
As reported by TorrentFreak, a New York man's large-scale pirating of Ultimate Fighting Championship videos via The Pirate Bay and KickassTorrents has landed him on the uncomfortable end of a $32 million lawsuit. From the article: "Known online as Secludedly, the man uploaded at least 124 events. As a result UFC parent Zuffa is hitting him with everything from copyright infringement, to fraud, to breach of contract. ... The lawsuit, which includes two other doe defendants and an unknown company Zuffa refers to as XYZ Corp (“a business entity, the exact nature of which is unknown”), centers around the unlawful recording (“capping”), uploading and distribution of more than 120 UFC events via two of the world’s biggest torrent sites. ... Also receiving a prominent mention from Zuffa is the fact that Secludedly allowed people to donate via a PayPal in order to help with the financing of future ripping and uploading activities."
Content creators going after the uploaders rather than the torrent format or site? Good. That's doing it right.
Why is there no link to the f* article in the summary?
Seriously can you throw out court cases because the plaintiff accuses of too much bullshit? Copyright infringement, yeah I get that. But fraud? How is torrenting a video fraud unless the man's username was OfficialUFCDistributor or some other misrepresentation like that.
But breach of contract? That should be a simple one. Show me the signed contract and THEN we can talk about how it was breached. Given that the person is going by username, and a company called XYZ corp I'm willing to bet Zuffa doesn't have a legally binding contract unless they routinely make contracts without any identities.
Even if the price seems ridiculous, you are not entitled to just grab the content for free if you can't or won't pay for it.
Well, it mainly depends on what side you root for. If getting caught breaking the law is the problem, and if you consider the law unjust, then the obvious solution for you is a better way to circumvent the law.
For reference, see prohibition.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
I think he's the guy that is usually already so drunk when you arrive at the bar that he keeps paying for your drinks.
Awesome dude, really, but ... not much of a conversation buddy.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Thanks for the Lemons analogy. Just one correction:
Consider that the lemonade was COPIED (recipe..)
Your turn.
if someone harms society
This is an important point that should not be lightly passed over. Do uploaders harm society? Your comment appears to take it as a given that the answer is "yes". All your points about punishment and rehab may be relevant, if that's true. You say that punishment is not effective. Why isn't it effective? I suggest it is because in this instance the deed for which punishment is being meted out should not be a crime.
If uploaders do not harm society, then the situation is very different. In that case, the law is outdated, wrong, cruel, and a tool of evil oppressors. Those who are sowing confusion and preventing the laws from being reformed have their own obvious agenda of maintaining a status quo that unfairly enriches them at the expense of everyone else. Where is our digital public library? And punishment looks not like justice, but mere brutality, and will not convince anyone. As arguments go, punishment is one of the weakest. Certainly exposes the establishment as ideologically bankrupt. Their other arguments, that artists will starve and we'll not have any more art, and that copying is stealing, are being seen more and more as plain wrong. All they have left are threats. Threats and punishments don't make Christians out of unbelievers and heretics, they just drive heresy underground.
Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"